Total Phenolic Content, Ferric Reducing and DPPH-Scavenging Activity of Arum Dioscoridis

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Total Phenolic Content, Ferric Reducing and DPPH-Scavenging Activity of Arum dioscoridis

Fatih Karahana, Muhittin Kulaka, Emrah Urlua, Hediye Gül Gözüacika, Tülay Böyümeza, Nazım Şekeroğlub*, İbrahim Halil Doganturkc

a Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kilis 7 Aralık University, 79000, Kilis, Turkey (; ; ; , )

b MAPs Programme, Plant and Animal Sciences Department, Vocational School, Kilis 7 Aralık University, 79000, Kilis, Turkey ()

c Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kilis 7 Aralik University, 79000, Kilis, Turkey ( )

Arum dioscoridis, locally called “Gavur pancari”, is a wild plant which leaves has been used as vegetable and collected from wild and prepared local special soup with a sour taste. This study was set up to determine in vitro antioxidant activities and total phenolic and flavonoid contents of different extracts of A. dioscoridis. Free radical scavenging activity was evaluated using DPPH and ferric reducing activity with different concentrations of ethanol, methanol, acetone and aqueous extracts of plant leaves. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents were widely variable depending on solvents. Ethanol and methanol extractions of the plant material showed better performances with respect to the both phenolic and flavonoid contents, respectively. The highest contents of phenolic and flavonoid contents of ethanol and methanol extracts were 100.890 mg/g GAE and 72.643 mg/g QE. The lower DPPH scavenging and ferric reducing activity were determined in comparison with previous reports and standard synthetic chemicals.

Keywords: Arum dioscoridis, DPPH, Ferric reducing, flavonoid content, phenolic content

*Corresponding author:

(Dr. N. Sekeroglu): E-mail:

3. Experimental

3.1. Plant material: Arum dioscoridis var. syriacum widely and naturally distributed in the province of Kilis and its districts are collected during the first months of the year and then consumed during the rest of the year for the cuisine purpose (Akgunlu, 2012). The uses of Arum sp. as a folk medicine in many parts of Turkey have been well documented in various reports (Baytop, 1999). İn this context, the leaves of the plant were collected in February and the plant was botanically identified at Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kilis 7 Aralik University, Turkey. Soil residues were removed from the plant and the leaves were air-dried at lab conditions.

3.2. Preparation of leaf extracts: The air-dried and finely powdered leaves of Arum dioscoridis (5 g) were stirred with 100 ml of pure methanol for 30 min, respectively. Extraction was carried out using maceration at room temperature for 24 h followed by filtration through Whatman No.4 filter paper. The extracts were then concentrated in vacuo at 40 °C using a Rotary Evaporator. Then the extracts were preserved in sealed vials at 4 °C until further analysis.

3.3. Determination of total phenolic content: Total phenolic content was determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent method (Singleton et al., 1999). The amount of total phenol was calculated as mg/g (Gallic Acid Equivalents) from calibration curve of Gallic acid standard solution (R2=0. 9993). An aliquot of each sample (0.1 ml) was diluted to 1 ml with distilled water. Briefly, 0.5 ml of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (1:1 v/v) and 1.5 ml of 20 % (w/v) sodium carbonate were added to the diluted sample solution, and the mixture was then vortexed and allowed to stand for 2 hours at room temperature for color development. The volume was completed to 10 ml with distilled water and their absorbance was measured at 765 nm (Evolution 201 UV-Visible Spectrophotometer). The total phenolic content was expressed as mg/g gallic acid equivalents (GAE). All samples were analyzed in triplicate.

3.4. Determination of total flavonoid content: The flavonoids content was determined by aluminum chloride method using quercetine as a reference compound (Kumaran ve Karunakaran, 2006).This method based on the formation of a complex flavonoid-aluminum. The amount of total flavonoid was calculated from calibration curve of quercetine standard solution (R2 =0. 9815). 1ml of Arum dioscoridis leaf extracts or standard quercetine solution (500 µg/ml) was added to 4 ml distilled water and 0.3 ml of 5% NaNO2 was added. After 5 minutes, 0.3 ml of 10 % AlCl3 was added. After 6 min, 2mL of 1 mol L- NaOH was added and final total volume was completed to 10 mL with distilled water. The solution was thoroughly mixed. Afterwards the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 510 nm against prepared water as a blank. The total flavonoid content of Arum dioscoridis leaves was expressed as mg quercetine equivalents (QE) /g of dried leaf material.

3.5. Scavenging effect on 2, 2-diphenyl-1picrylhydrazyl: The antioxidant activity of the leaf extracts was evaluated byDPPHradical scavenging assay described byBlois(1958). The reaction mixture including 1 ml of DPPH solution (0.1 mM in methanol) and leaf extracts (1 mg/ml-0.500 mg/ml-0.250 mg/ml-0.125 mg/ml) adjusted to 3 ml by adding methanol were left at room temperature in dark for 30 min and initial absorbance and absorbance after 30 min-incubation was measured at 517 nm. The assays were carried out in triplicate. The DPPH radical scavenging percentage was calculated from the following equation

% DPPH radical scavenging = [(control absorbance – extract absorbance)/control absorbance] x100

3.6. Reducing power assay: The reducing power was determined according to the method proposed by Oyaizu (1986). An aliquot of 1 ml plant extract (1 mg/ml-0.500 mg/ml-0.250 mg/ml-0.125 mg/ml) was mixed with 2,5 ml of phosphate buffer (0.2M, pH =6.6) and 2,5 ml of K3Fe(CN)6 (1 %), shaken well and left for incubation at 50 °C for 20 min. After incubation, 2,5 ml of TCA (10%) was added in order to stop the reaction and the mixture was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min. 2, 5 ml of supernatant, 2, 5 ml of distilled water and 0, 5 ml of FeCl3 (1%) was mixed and incubated for 10 min and absorbance was read at 700 nm on spectrophotometer. The assays were carried out in triplicate.

3.7. Statistical Analysis: MSTAT-C statistical program was used to determine statistical significance levels and the differences between individual averages were considered to be statistically important at p<0.05 probability level.

Table S1. The total polyphenol content of Arum leaf extracts

Polyphenol content (mg/g DW) / Acetone / Ethanol / Methanol / Aqueous
Phenolic content (mg GAE/g DW) / 92,55 b / 100,89 a / 81,63 c / 81,76 c
Flavonoid content (mg QE /g DW) / 1,23 c / 2,39 c / 72,64 a / 30,47 b

Notes: Results are expressed as mean of three replicates. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and within each column different letters indicate statistically different values according to LSD-test at P< 0.05; mg GAE/g DW, milligram Gallic acid equivalent per gram dry extract; mg QE /g DW, milligram quercetine equivalent per gram dry extract

Table S2. Correlation between total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, DPPH scavenging and ferric reducing activities of different leaf extracts of Arum dioscoridis var. syriacum (r)

Correl. coeff. (r) / TPC / TFC / DPPH / Fe-Reduc.
TPC / 1 / -0,79608 / -0,4880635 / 0,09477687
TFC / -0,7960794 / 1 / 0,8438584 / 0,2530556
DPPH / -0,4880635 / 0,843858 / 1 / 0,7313417
Fe-Reduc. / 0,09477687 / 0,253056 / 0,7313417 / 1

Notes 1: Correl. coeff.: Correlation coefficient; TPC: Total phenolic content; TFC: Total flavonoid content; DPPH: 2, 2-diphenyl-1picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity; Fe-Reduc. Ferric reducing activity

Table S3. Ferric reducing activity of different leaf extracts of Arum dioscoridis var. syriacum

Concentration/Extract / 1 mg/ml / 0.5 mg/ml / 0.25 mg/ml / 0.125 mg/ml
Acetone / 1,67 e / 1,26 f / 0,89 h / 0,57 i
Ethanol / 3,2 a / 3,01 b / 2,01 d / 1,31 f
Methanol / 2,75 c / 1,71 e / 1,03 g / 0,57 i
Aqueous / 2,74 c / 1,93 d / 1,09 g / 0,63 i

Notes: Data are expressed as means of three replicates. The mean is significant at the 0.05 level and the results are expressed as absorbance at 700 nm

Table S4. DPPH scavenging activities of different leaf extracts of Arum dioscoridis var. syriacum (%)

Concentration/Extract / 1 mg/ml / 0.5 mg/ml / 0.25 mg/ml / 0.125 mg/ml
Acetone / 10.68 cd / 6.44 efg / 4.18 ghi / 3.06 hi
Ethanol / 14.85 b / 7.76 ef / 4.85 ghi / 2.55 i
Methanol / 18.25 a / 11.28 c / 6.71 efg / 4.86 ghi
Aqueous / 15.22 b / 8.88 de / 5.50 fgh / 3.65 hi
GA / 95,88 / 95,67 / 84,1 / 47,76
AA / 96,93 / 66,04 / 32,74 / 13,31

Notes-1: Data are expressed as means of three replicates. The mean is significant at the 0.05 level and the results are expressed as inhibition percentage (%).Data were analysed by ANOVA and within each column different letters indicate statistically different values according to LSD-test at P< 0.05; GA: Gallic acid; AA: Ascorbic acid; Notes-2: Standard antioxidant compounds, GA and AA, were excluded from statistical analysis. Mean of three replicates were presented in the Table. The different extraction organic solvents were compared using MSTAT-C statistical program.

References

Akgunlu, S.B. (2012). Mineral content and microbiological analysis of some wild edible vegetables consumed in Kilis and Gaziantep provinces [Master thesis]. Kilis: Kilis 7 Aralık University.

Baytop, T. (1999). Türkiye’de Bitkiler ile Tedavi (Geçmişte ve Bugün). İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, No.253-255. Eczacılık Fakültesi No:40, Sanal Matbaacılık, 372.

Blois, M.S. (1958). Antioxidant Determinations by the Use of a Stable Free Radical, Nature, 26, 1199–1200.

Kumaran, A. & Karunakaran, R.J. (2006). Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of Coleus aromaticus. Food Chemistry. 97, 109-114.

Oyaizu, M. (1986). Studies on product of browning reaction prepared from glucose amine. Japanese Journal of Nutrition. 44, 307-315.

Singleton, V.L., Orthofer, R., Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. (1999): Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 299, 152-178.