Abstract:
The talk contains a short presentation of the task arising from the
project requirements for a customer from the chemical industry, a
description of the theoretical statistical solution, a description of
the SAS software development and a short showcase of the application via
a Java interface.
The concerned task is to estimate the effective dose at 50% response
(ED50) and other corresponding measures (slope, confidence intervals
etc.) given measured S-shaped dose-response samples from chemical and
biological data. Real data dose-response curves do not always fulfill
the requirements for a successful typical sigmoidal curve fit. The
problems appear when measuring an improper dose range, when not having
enough measurements or when the response is not sigmoidal at all. These
problems get even higher when wishing to automatically fit the
estimation process for huge database amounts of different dose-response
curves. Therefore, we establish a package of representative sigmoidal
models used usually in the chemical, biological and medical research:
The two, three and four parametric logistic function, the GLM with
normal link, the Gompertz function and the Brain-Cousens five parametric
logistic function. The parameters of the three and four logistic
functions represent the ED50, the slope of the curve at ED50, the
asymptotic maximum and/or minimum of the fit. The fifth parameter of the
Brain-Cousens function expresses a linear shift on the dose scale and is
used in the research of some special types of dose-response curves. Here
it can happen that for small doses the compound of interest has the
adverse effect resulting in response values above the level of the
control group. The parameters of the two parametric logistic, GLM with
normal link and Gompertz models cannot be directly interpreted in terms
of ED50 or slope. We fit for a dose-response sample these models and
setup a filter for deciding upon the best of fit: First we drop the fits
for which the algorithm did not converge. Secondly, for the remaining
fits, we calculate the Akaike measure and the slightly for small samples
adapted Akaike measure and decide for the best-of-fit by using the
Akaike criterion. If the result consists of two fits with the same
Akaike measure, we decide for the fit giving the smaller confidence
intervals for the ED50. Using this best-of-fit model we deliver the
estimators for the desired ED50, slope, confidence intervals and other
doses determined by the inverse of the fit at certain responses.