Table S2Detailed profiles of the New England college students and their institutions sampled in the study

Public SecularPrivate SecularReligious IReligious II

______Grand Totals

ContactedResponders ContactedRespondersContactedRespondersContactedRespondersResponders

______

No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)

Total7,982(100)a161(2.0)a3,806(100)a298(7.8)a3,910(100)a185(4.7)a1,923(100)a183(9.5)a827(100)b

Females3,792(47.5)a95(59.0)c1,899(49.9)a185(62.1)c2,172(55.5)a111(60.0)c1,328(69.1)a118(64.5)c509(61.5)b

Males4,191(52.5)a66(41.0)c1,907(50.1)a113(37.9)c1,738(44.5)a74(40.0)c595(30.9)a65(35.5)c318(38.5)b

Freshman2,786(34.9)a49(30.4)c1,179(31.0)a79(26.5)c970(24.8)a44(23.8)c592(30.8)a41(22.4)c213(25.8)b

Sophomore1,796(22.5)a46(28.6)c947(24.9)a67(22.5)c970(24.8)a42(22.7)c419(21.8)a37(20.2)c192(23.2)b

Junior1,828(22.9)a28(17.4)c905(23.8)a70(23.5)c997(25.5)a50(27.0)c398(20.7)a35(19.1)c182(22.0)b

Senior1,572(19.7)a38(23.6)c775(20.4)82(27.5)c973(24.9)a49(26.5)c514(26.7)a70(38.3)c240(29.0)b

New England7,846(98.3)ad145(90.1)ce2,864(75.2)ad222(74.5)ce2,615(66.9)ad124(67.0)ce1,552(80.7)ad139(76.0)ce630(76.2)b

East Coast56(0.7)af6(3.7)cg700(18.4)af58(19.5)cg976(24.9)af38(20.5)cg274(14.2)af22(12.0)cg124(15.0)b

Other48(0.6)ah5(3.1)ci141(3.7)ah10(3.4)ci283(7.2)ah16(8.7)ci75(3.9)ah19(10.4)ci50(6.0)b

Foreign countries32(0.4)aj5(3.1)ck101(2.7)aj8(2.7)ck36(1.0)aj7(3.8)ck22(1.2)aj3(1.6)ck23(2.8)b

aPercentages in respect to total number of students contacted per institution (Public Secular=University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, n=7,982; Private Secular=Roger Williams University, n=3,806;Religious I=Providence College, n=3,910; and Religious II=Salve Regina University, n=1,923).Note that 17,621 students were contacted of which a grand total of 827 (4.7%) responded to the survey

bPercentages in respect to grand total number of responders n=827

cPercentages in respect to total number of responders to the survey per institution (public secular=161, private secular=298, religious I=185, religious II=183)

dNew England contacted: public secular institution were natives from MA, 95.3%; RI, 1.9%; CT, NH, ME and VT, 1.1%; private secular institution were natives from MA,35.8%; CT,20.4%; RI, 11.3%; NH, 4.4%; ME, 2.1%; and VT, 1.2%; religious I institution were natives from MA, 34.2%; CT, 15.4%; RI, 13.1%; NH, 2.5%; ME and VT 1.7%; and religious II institution were natives from MA, 27.9%; RI, 26.8%; CT, 19.6%; NH, 3.1%; ME, 2.5%; and VT, 0.8%

eNew England responders: public secular institution were natives from MA, 86.6%; RI, 2.5%; and CT, 1.0%; private secular institution were natives from MA, 29.1%; CT, 19.3%; RI, 15.4%; NH, 6.5%; VT, 2.8; and ME, 1.4%; religious I institution were natives from MA, 37.2%; RI, 14.1%; CT, 11.2%; NH, 2.0%; ME, 1.5%; and VT, 1%; and religious II institution were natives from MA, 26.4%; RI, 24.8%; CT, 18.8%; NH, 2.9%; ME, 1.8; and VT, 1.3%

f East Coast contacted: public secular institution were natives from NY, NJ, VA, MD and DE,0.7%; private secular institution were natives from NY,9.9%; NJ, 6.7%; PA, MD, DC and VA, 1.8%; religious I institution were natives from NY, 15.7%; NJ, 6.4%; PA, 1.5%; MD, VA, DE and DC, 1.3%; and religious II institution were natives from NY, 7.4%; NJ, 5.3%; PA, FL, MD, VA, DC and SC, 1.5%

gEast Coast responders: public secular institution were natives from NY, 2.7%; NJ and VA, 1.0%; private secular institution were natives from NY, 9.8%; NJ, 5.2%; PA, 2.3%; MD, 1.2%; and VA, 1.0%; religious I institution were natives from NY, 10.2%; NJ, 6.8%; PA, 2.5%; DE and VA, 1.0%; and religious II institution were natives from NY, 7.0%; NJ, 3.2%; MD, 1.0%; PA and VA, 0.8%

hOther contacted: public secular institution were natives from thirteen states and sixteen unidentifiedstates, 0.6%; private secular institution were natives from twenty states, 3.7%; religious I institution were natives from to twenty eight states, 7.2%; and religious II institution were natives from to seventeen states, 3.9%

iOther responders: public secular institution were natives from four states AZ, FL, MI, and TX, 3.1%; private secular institution were natives from nine states CA, CO, GA, IL, IN, KT, MI, TN, and WA, 3.4%; religious I institution were natives from eleven states CA, FL, IL, IN, MN, MO, OH, OR, SC, TN, and TX, 8.7%; and religious II institution were natives from eleven states CA, FL, HI, IN, MI, MO, NM, OH, TN, TX, WI, plus Puerto Rico and four unidentified states, 10.4%

jForeign countries contacted:public secular institution corresponded to sixteen nationalities, 0.4%; private secular institution corresponded to forty two nationalities, 2.7%; religious I institution corresponded to fourteen nationalities, 1.0%; and religious II institution corresponded to eight nationalities, 1.2%

kForeign countries responders: public secular institution corresponded to four nationalities (Brazil, Cape Verde, Cameroon, and Philippines, 3.1%); private secular institution corresponded to eight nationalities (France, Ghana, India, Korea, Lebanon, Peru, Romania, and UK, 2.7%); religious I institution corresponded to seven nationalities (Bosnia, Canada, Ghana, Korea, Latvia, Portugal, and Zimbabwe, 3.8%); and religious II institution corresponded to three nationalities (Ecuador, Japan, and Rwanda, 1.6%)