File No: NA/256 Date:October 1996
NATIONALINDUSTRIALCHEMICALSNOTIFICATIONANDASSESSMENTSCHEME
FULL PUBLIC REPORT ALKANE5
ThisAssessmenthasbeencompiledinaccordancewiththeprovisionsoftheIndustrialChemicals(NotificationandAssessment)Act1989.Thislegislation isanActoftheCommonwealthofAustralia.TheNationalIndustrialChemicals NotificationandAssessmentScheme(NICNAS) isadministeredbyWorksafeAustraliawhichalsoconductstheoccupationalhealthsafetyassessment.TheassessmentofenvironmentalhazardisconductedbytheDepartmentoftheEnvironment,Sport,andTerritoriesandtheassessmentofpublic healthisconductedbytheDepartmentofHumanServicesandHealth.
Forthepurposesofsubsection78(1)oftheAct,copiesofthisfullpublicreportmaybeinspectedbythepublicattheLibrary,WorksafeAustralia,92-94ParramattaRoad,Camperdown NSW2050,betweenthehoursof10.00amand12.00noonand2.00pmand4.00pmeachweekdayexceptonpublicholidays.
ForEnquiriespleasecontacttheAdministrationCoordinatorat:
Street Address: 92ParramattaRdCamperdown,NSW2050,AUSTRALIA
Postal Address:GPOBox58,Sydney2001,AUSTRALIA
Telephone:(61)(02)9565-9466FAX (61) (02) 9565-9465
Director
ChemicalsNotificationandAssessment
NA/256
FULL PUBLIC REPORT
ALKANE5
1.APPLICANT
ChevronChemicalAustraliaofLevel22385BourkeStMELBOURNEVIC3000 hasappliedforanassessmentcertificateandsubmittedastandardnotificationpackagefortheimportationofthechemical,"Alkane5",undersection23oftheIndustrialChemicals(NotificationandAssessment)Act1989.
2.IDENTITYOFTHECHEMICAL
Other name(s):Polyalphaolefin;Alkane5
Trade name(s):PAO68cSt(C12content10%)
PAO79cSt(C12content98%)
Methodofdetectionanddetermination:
1.Infraredspectroscopyanalysis
2.HighPerformanceLiquidChromatographyandGasChromatography:
ThehomopolymeristrappedonaC18reverse-phaseHPLCcolumnbeforebeingelutedoffwithhexane,andthenanalysedbyGC(detectionlimitof10ppb)
3.PHYSICALANDCHEMICALPROPERTIESAppearance at 20°C
and 101.3 kPa:clearcolourlessliquid
Odour:not provided
Boilingpoint:420-650°C
Specificgravity/density:0.8337kg/m3at 15°C
Vapour pressure:5.0 x 10-2mmHgat25°C (Reidvapourpressure)
Watersolubility:10ppb-OECD105(runtoSOPstandards)
Partitionco-efficient
(n-octanol/water):log Pow> 8.0 (HPLC)
HydrolysisasafunctionofpH:stableunderallconditions
Adsorption/desorption:thePAOhydrogenatedhomopolymerprobablywillnot
associatewitheithersoilorwater;duetoitsverylowwatersolubility,itwillmigrateslowlythroughsoilbeforebiodegrading.
Dissociationconstant:willnotdissociate
Flashpoint:180°C
Flammabilitylimits:willburninthepresenceofenoughheatandoxygen
Combustionproducts:completecombustionproductsarecarbondioxideand
water
Decompositiontemperature:300°C
Decompositionproducts:incompletecombustionproductsarecarbondioxide,
water,carbonmonoxide,olefinichydrocarbons,andoxygenatedhydrocarbonfragments.
Autoignitiontemperature:200°C
Explosiveproperties:notknowntobeexplosive
Reactivity/stability:willreactinthepresenceofstrongoxidisingagents.
Stabletoacidandbase.
Particlesizedistribution:viscousliquid;willnotformparticles.
CommentsonPhysico-ChemicalProperties
WatersolubilitywasdeterminedusingPAO4cSt(trimerfractionofthenotifiedpolyalphaolefininNA/255withasimilarmonomercomposition)followingthemethodofOECDGuideline105. AsAlkane5hasagreatermolecularweightrangethantheC10trimer,itisexpectedtohavealowersolubility(calculatingwatersolubilityusingaStructuralAnalysisRelationshipaccordingtothemethodofIrmann(1)).
NotestreportormethodwasprovidedforthedeterminationofthelogPowfor Alkane 5.However, a log Powof8wasdeterminedforPAO4cStusingreversephaseHPLC(methodgiveninChromatographia,27, 118-122,1989)byacomparisonofpolyaromatichydrocarbonstandardsrunwithPAO4cStandmeasuredusingUVspectrophotometry.ThenotifierhasusedthisvalueastheexpectedlogPowfor Alkane 5. As Alkane 5 isexpectedtohavealowerwatersolubilityandequalsolubilityinoctanolcomparedwithPAO 4 cSt, it is agreed that its log Powwillbegreaterthan8.
ThenotifierclaimsthatAlkane5willnothydrolyse Itisagreedthatthechemicalcontainsnofunctionalitiesthatwouldbesubjecttohydrolysis,ordissociate,undertheexpectedenvironmentalconditionsofuse.
Adsorption/desorptionwasnotdetermined. ThenotifierexpectsthatAlkane5willnotadsorbtosoil,norassociatewithwater,becauseofitslowwatersolubility. Further,itisexpectedtomigrateslowlythroughsoilbeforebiodegrading. Itisagreedthatmobilitythroughsoilwouldbeslow,butthiswouldbeduetoitsexpectedstrongadsorptiontosoilbecauseofitshighPow.
4.PURITYOFTHECHEMICALDegreeofpurity:100%Toxicorhazardousimpurities: noneNon-hazardousimpurities
(>1%byweight):none
Additives/Adjuvants:none
5.INDUSTRIALUSE
Theprimaryuseforthishydrogenatedpolyalpha-olefin(PAO)homopolymerisasabasefluidtoblend“synthetic”automotiveandindustriallubricants. Alkane5isproducedintheUnitedStatesandimportedintoAustralia. TheestimatedimportvolumewhichwillbeimportedintoAustraliaisapproximately300000kg/year.
6.OCCUPATIONALEXPOSURE
Thereislikelyexposureofworkersinvolvedinthetransferandtransportationofthenotifiedchemical,workerswhoblendthehydrogenatedtrimerintofinishedlubricants,andmechanicsortechnicianswhomaycomeintocontactwithPAOcontaininglubricantswhileworkingonorrepairingequipment.
Themostlikelyrouteofexposureforthistrimerisskinandeyecontactwhichwouldbeminimisedinmanufacturingandtransportationworkersbyengineeringcontrolsandprotectiveclothing. Howevermechanicsortechniciansrepairingequipmentwearprotectiveclothingbutoftenmaynotwearglovesoreyeprotection.
Alkane5willbeshippedtoAustraliainbulkorisotankerandstoredinbulkstoragetanks.Thenotifiedchemicalwill arriveatatypicalAustraliancustomer’sblendingplantbyrailcarortanktruck.Alkane5istransferredtoastoragetankthroughafourinchhose. Oneworker,wearingfullprotectiveclothing,gloves,andeyeprotection,spends10minutesfasteningtheendofthehosetothetankcarandafurther10minutesuncouplingthe
hosewhenthetransferiscomplete. Proceduresexisttoensurethatthereisnospillageduetolooseconnectionsbetweenhoseandtankcar.
Thefinishedautomotiveandindustriallubricantsarepreparedbypumpingthenotifiedchemicalandtheadditivepackagefromtheirstoragefacilitiesthroughcomputercontrolledvalveswhichmetertheprecisedeliveryofthecomponentsintoablendingtankwheremoreadditivesmaybeaddeddependingonformulationtobepreparedforspecificuses. Exposureofworkerscanoccurafterblendingduringsampleremovalforlaboratoryanalysis. Asampleoftheproductisremovedfromtheblendtankbyoneortwoworkerswearingeyeprotection,coveralls,andglovestoensurethatthespecificationsofthefinishedlubricantaremet. Workerswillbepotentiallyexposedtoan80-100%formulationfor30minutes,50daysayearatboththesamplingandanalysisstage. Duringthecleaningprocessoftheblendingtankanddrums,1workermaybeexposedtoan80-100%formulationofthenotifiedchemicalfor1hour,50daysayear.
Thisexposuremaybetolubeoilused tocleantheblendingtanksortothewastewaterfromthecleaningofthedrums. Exposuretothewastewaterwillbeminimalasthetreatmentprocessispartofengineeringcontrolprocessestominimiseexposure.
Thefinishedproducts,orthenotifiedchemicalitself,arepackagedinto1L,40L,or200Ldrums. Workerswillbepotentiallyexposedtothefinishedlubricantduringthepackagingofthedrums. Thelevelofexposureshouldbeminimalasthedrummingfacilityusesautomatedweightscalestofillthedrumsandpotentialworkerexposureoccursastheoperatorwatchesfrom1-2metresawaytoensurethedrumfillingmechanismproperlyentersthedrumbeforethedrumisfilled. Thebungsandlabelsareappliedbytheoperators. Thepackagingof1Land4Ljugsisautomatedandthereisminimalworkerexposure. Thereareapproximately20-30peopleinAustraliawhowouldbeinvolvedinthetransportationandpackagingofproductscontainingthenotifiedchemical.
Mechanicsmaybeexposedtothenotifiedchemicalataconcentrationofapproximately80%whilechangingautomobileengineoil. Dermalexposureislikelytooccur,andaccidentaleyecontactmayalsooccur,particularlywhilemechanicsareworkingundervehicles. Inhalationalexposureisunlikelyduetothelowvapourpressureofthenotifiedchemical.
7.PUBLICEXPOSURE
Thenotifiedchemicalwillbeusedasabasefluidtoblendsyntheticautomotiveandindustriallubricantsatalevelofabout80%.
Theautomotiveandindustriallubricantswillbepreparedinablendingtank. Therewillbelowpotentialforpublicexposuretothenotifiedchemicalduringblendingoperations.Theblendingequipmentiscleanedwithsteamandatypical5000kgblendingtankwouldhaveabout1kgofresiduewhichwillbesenttoawastewatertreatmentfacility.Afterfurtherseparationoftheoilfromwater,lessthanagramwillbeemulsifiedinthewaterandreleasedtothemunicipalsewer.
Industrialuseofthelubricantsinfoodpackagingandprocessingequipmentmayresultincontaminationoffoodwiththeproductwhenincidentalcontactwithfoodoccurs. This
typeofequipmentwouldbemaintainedbyskilledworkersandcontaminationshouldbeminimalandinfrequent.
Theautomotiveengineoilcontainingapproximately80%ofthenotifiedchemicalpackagedin4or1Lcontainerswillbeavailabletothegeneralpublic. Thus,thepubliccanbeexposedtothenotifiedchemicalbyskincontactduringoilchanges,buttheexposureisshortandoccursinfrequently. Accidentalsplashingintotheeyecanalsooccur. Inhalationalexposurewillbenegligiblebecauseofitslowvapourpressure.
Disposaloftheusedoilisnotexpectedtoresultinpublicexposureifitisdisposedofaccordingtogovernmentregulations.
Whenusedinautomobileengineoil,thenotifiedchemicalmaybedecomposedinthecombustionchamber,andthedecompositionproductsmaybeemittedintotheairviatheautomobiletailpipe. CompletecombustionofPAO2cStproducescarbondioxideandwater. Inthecaseofincompletecombustionordecomposition,amixtureofcarbondioxide,water,carbonmonoxide,olefinichydrocarbons,andoxygenatedhydrocarbonfragmentsareproduced. Thenotifierclaimedthatthedecompositionproductsemittedfromanautomobilewillbeverylimitedandnotdistinguishablefromthefuelderivedcombustionproducts,whichwilldominatethehydrocarbonemissions. Therefore,publicexposuretothedecompositionproductsfromincompletecombustionofthenotifiedchemicalinautomobileenginesisexpectedtobelow.
Inthecaseofaccidentalspillageduringtransport,thepublicmaybeexposedtothenotifiedchemical. However,theexposurewillbeminimalifthespillsarecontainedandcleanedupbytherecommendedpracticessuchasapplicationofabsorbentmaterialsandpumpingasoutlinedintheMaterialSafetyDataSheet(MSDS).
8.ENVIRONMENTALEXPOSURE
.Release
Theformulationofsyntheticautomotiveandindustriallubricantswillinvolveanautomatedblendingprocess. Thenotifierestimatesthatonsteam-cleaningoftheequipmentanddrums,about1kgfroma5tonnebatchoffinishedproduct(0.02%)mightbereleasedinthewastewater. Afteroilseparationofthewastewater,only5%ofthe
1kgofoil(50g)releasedisexpectedtobeleftemulsifiedinwastewater. Thewastewaterisfurthertreatedbypondaeration,inwhichoilisskimmedfromthesurface,andsandfiltration,leadingtoafurtherreductionofgreaterthan2%(ie1g). Thefillingofcontainersisalsohighlyautomatedandcleanedwithlubeoil. Anyspillageinfillingcontainerswillbecleanedupwithsawdustorrags.
Oilthatcanbereclaimedintheaboveprocesseswillberecycled,whilecontaminatedsolidswilleitherbeburntorlandfilled. Anyuseddrumswillberecycledandsteamcleanedforre-use.
.Fate
SomeAlkane5willbecombustedanddestroyedinusewhenusedasanautomotiveorindustrialoil,whilethemajoritywillsharethefateofrecycledoil. Also,aminorcomponentwillbereleasedtotheenvironmentfromspillsandleaks,butwillbewidelydispersedandexpectedtoadsorbtosoilsorsedimentsadjacenttheroadorequipment.Asmallamountmayvolatilise.
Thenotifierestimatesthatabout20%oftheexpectedvolumetobeusedinautomotiveandindustrialoils(ie20%x300tonne=60tonne)willbeusedbyhomeusersfor"do-it-your-self"purposes. IthasbeenestimatedfromanANZECreport(2)onusedlubricatingoil,that35%oftheoilusedforautomotivepurposeswillnotbecollectedandcouldbedisposedofinaninappropriatemanner1. Aworstcasescenariowouldbeifallofthisuncollectedoilwasdumpedintoasewerinsomecountrycentre. This,however,wouldgiveaconcentrationofonlyabout12mg/Lper day2. Foramajorcity,theamountwouldonlybeabout115µg/Lperday. However,withitsuseAustraliawide,andwithgoodindustrialandpublicpractice,significantaquaticexposuretothepolymerisnotexpected.
·biodegradation
Informationonbiodegradationwasprovidedbythenotifier(4). ThisindicatedthatPAO6andPAO8,unspecifiedfractionsofAlkane5,werenotreadilybiodegradablewithprimarydegradationof47%and29%achieved,althoughultimatedegradationofonly41%and7%after28dwasachieved. Italsoindicatedthatforarangeofpolyalphaolefins,theextentofdegradationofthepolyalphaolefinsdecreasedwithincreasingmolecularweight. ItwouldappearthatAlkane5wouldgenerallynotbereadilybiodegradable.
UltimatebiodegradabilityofPAO6andPAO8rangedfrom41to7%,andwhilesomemineralisationwasthereforeshown,itwasclassedasnotultimatelydegradable.
·bioaccumulation
ThebioaccumulationpotentialofAlkane5wasnotdetermined. ThenotifierclaimsthatasitslogPowisgreaterthan8,itisnotlikelytobioaccumulatebecausethematerialis
practicallywaterinsoluble.Notingtheliterature(4),itisagreedthatitslowwatersolubility(<0.002mol/m3)andhighlogPow(>6),aswellasitsreadybiodegradation,islikelytolimitbioaccumulation.
1Nofiguresareavailableforhowmuchautomotiveoilwascollectedforre-use,butanestimateofabout35%ofalloilsoldisnotcollectedandpossiblydisposedofinaninappropriatemanner.Therefore,thispercentagewillbespecificallyappliedtoautomotiveoils.
2Given35%ofoilnotcollectedandassumingonly20%oftheimportedbasefluidisusedasanautomotiveoilforhomeuse,21000kgoftheadditivewouldalsonotbecollected(ie.35%x20%x300000kg). Thiswouldbe58kg/d(ie.21000kg/365d). Thedilutionataruraltowncouldreasonablybeexpectedtobeabout5 ML,whileforamajorcity,sayMelbourne,itwouldbe500 ML. Thiswouldgivefinalconcentrationsoftheoilof12mg/Lperdayand115µg/Lperday,respectively.
9.EVALUATIONOFTOXICOLOGICALDATA
Alltheacutestudiesexceptfortheinhalationaltoxicitystudywereperformedwiththenotifiedchemical. Theacuteinhalationaltoxicity,repeateddosetoxicityandgenotoxicitystudieswereconductedwithacloselyrelatedcompoundPAO2. ThetoxicitystudiesonPAO2cStcanbeusedtoassessthetoxicityofthehomopolymer,whichhasarelativelyhighermolecularweight.
9.1AcuteToxicity
AcutestudiesonPAO8cStwereprovidedinaconferencereport. GLPstatusandqualityassurancewerenotstated.
Table 1 SummaryoftheacutetoxicityofAlkane5(PAO8cSt)
TestSpeciesOutcomeReference
OraltoxicityratLD505mL/kg(4168mg/kg)
(5,6)
Dermal toxicityrabbitLD502000mg/kg(5,7)
Inhalational toxicity*ratLC50=1170mg/m3(5,8,9)
Skin Irritationrabbitnon-irritant(5,10)
Eye irritationrabbitmildirritant(5,12)
Skinsensitisationguineapignon-irritant(5)
*StudyperformedwithacloselyrelatedcompoundPAO2cStwithalowermolecularweightthanthehomopolymer.
9.1.1OralToxicity(5,6)
FastedSpragueDawley(SD)rats(5/sex)wereadministered5mL/kgofundilutedPAO8cStbysingleoralgavageandobservedfor14days. Nodeathsoccurred. Ruffledfuranddiarrhoeawereobservedduringthefirst24hoursafterdosing,butalltheanimalsappearednormalbyday2. Necropsyexaminationrevealed3casesofmoderatehydrometraand3casesoflungswithsmallscatteredclear,firmraisedareas. Itwasnotknowniftheselesionsweretreatment-related. TheoralLD50of PAO 8 cSt was > 5 mL/kg(4168mg/kg).
Inanotherstudy(6),10fastedSDrats(5/sex)wereadministered5000mg/kgAlkane5byasingleoralgavageandobservedfor14days. Therewerenodeathsorsignsofsystemictoxicity. Necropsyfindingswerenormal. TheacuteoralLD50wasgreaterthan5000mg/kg.
9.1.2DermalToxicity(5,7)
OnegroupofyoungadultalbinoNZWrabbits(4/sex)weredermallytreatedwith2000mg/kgofPAO8cStundergauzepatchonintactskinfor24hours,andasecondgroupwassimilarlytreatedonabradedskin. Theobservationperiodwas14days. Nodeathsorsignsofsystemictoxicitywereobserved. Skinirritationincludingslighterythemaandoedemaatthetreatmentsitewasobservedduringthefirst4daysoftheobservationperiod. ThedermalLD50ofPAO8cStinrabbitswas2000mg/kg.
Inanotherstudy(7),10fastedSDrats(5/sex)weredermallytreatedwith2000mg/kgAlkane5ontheintactskinundersemi-occlusivedressingfor24hoursandobservedfor14days. Therewerenodeathsorsignsofsystemictoxicity. Necropsyfindingswerenormal. TheacutedermalLD50wasgreaterthan2000mg/kg.
9.1.3InhalationToxicity(5,8,9)
Aninhalationstudyonthenotifiedchemicalwasnotconducted,butstudiesonacloselyrelatedcompound,PAO2cSt,wasprovided.
Inonestudy(5,8)5groupsofCharlesRiverCDalbinorats(5/sex/group)wereexposedtoanaerosolofSF-0203-41(PAO2cSt)at770,940,1100,1400or5100mg/m3for
4hours.Theaverageaerosolparticlesizewas2.9±2.07mm. Acontrolgroupwassimilarlyexposedtoaironly. Theanimalswereobservedfor14daysafterexposure.
Clinicalsignsobservedduringandafterexposureincludeddyspnoeaandnasaldischarge. Deathsoccurredwithinthefirst2daysafterexposureinallfemalegroupsandthemalegroupsexposedto1100mg/m3ormoreoftestsubstance. Thehighdosegroupsgainedlessbodyweightduringthefirstweekafterexposure,butthebodyweightgainwasnormalinthesecondweekpost-exposure. Macroscopicchangeswereobservedintheanimalsthatdiedduringthestudyandincludedrednasaldischargeandcongestedlungs.
Microscopicexaminationwasnotconductedintheratsexposedto770-1400mg/m3.Inthe5100mg/m3group,pulmonarycongestionwasobservedinalltheanimals. Muralproteincastswereobservedintheterminalandrespiratorybronchioles. Thecontrolanimalswerenormal. TheLC50forthecombinedsexeswas1170mg/m3.
Inthesecondinhalationstudy(9),agroupof10CDrats(5/sex)wereexposedtoanaerosolofPAO2cStat5170mg/m3(maximumpracticalconcentration)for1hour. Acontrolgroup(5/sex)wassimilarlyexposedtoroomaironly. Theanimalswereobservedfor14daysafterexposure.
Theaverageaerosolparticlesizewas1.9mmwithastandarddeviationof1.8. Onlyonetreatedfemalesurvivedduringthestudyandothertreatedanimalsdiedorweresacrificedondays1-3afterexposure. Clinicalsignsoftoxicityincludedreducedactivity,partlyclosedeyes,hunchedback,lateralprostration,increasedrespiratoryrate,labouredandirregularbreathing,andmuzzleandabdominalstaining. Thesurvivingfemalewasclinicallynormalbyday9. Noclinicalsignswereobservedinthecontrols.
Grosspathologicalexaminationrevealedanincreasedincidenceoffluidinthetrachea,uncollapsedlungsanddiscolourationofthelungsintheanimalsthatdiedduringthestudyandincreasedlungandtracheaweightsinthesurvivingfemale. Microscopicalexaminationshowedacutepneumoniaand/orhaemorrhageinthelungs,andslightfocalormultifocaldegenerationand/ornecrosisoftheepitheliumofthenasalseptuminthetreatedanimals. Thesurvivingfemalehadmildinterstitialpneumoniaofachronicnatureandslightfocalhyperplasiaoftherespiratoryepithelium. Myocardialdegenerationand/orfibrosiswerealsoobservedinthisanimalandwasconsideredpossiblyrelatedtothetreatment.
9.1.4SkinIrritation(5,10)
SixyoungadultNZWrabbits(3/sex)weredermallytreatedwith0.5mLofPAO8cSton intactskinontheleftsideandabradedskinontherightsideandcoveredwithagauzepatchfor24hours. Attheendoftheexposure,anyresidualtestmaterialwasgentlywipedfromtheskin. Theskinwasexaminedimmediatelyafterpatchremovalandat72hoursafterapplication.
Theprimarydermalirritationindexwas0.1at24hoursand0at72hoursusingthemethodofDraize(11). Thetestsubstancewasnotaskinirritantinrabbits.
Inanotherstudy(10),6NZWrabbitsweredermallytreatedwith0.5mLofAlkane5ontotheintactskinundera2.5x2.5cmcottongauzepatchfor4hours. Theskinwasexaminedat30min,24,48and72hoursafterpatchremovalandscoredaccordingtotheDraizemethod. Noerythemaoroedemawasobservedandtheprimaryirritationindexwas0. Alkane5wasnotaskinirritantinrabbits.
9.1.5EyeIrritation(5,12)
NineyoungadultNZWrabbitsweretreatedwith0.1mLofPAO8cStbyinstillationintotheconjunctivalsacoftherighteye. Theeyesof3rabbitswerewashedwithwaterforoneminuteafter20-30secondsexposure. Theeyeswereexaminedat24,48,72and
96hoursandat7daysaftertreatmentandscoredaccordingtotheDraizemethod(13).Theprimaryeyeirritationscorewas1.3at24hoursafterinstillationinbothwashedandunwashedeyes.Noirritationwasobservedby48hoursaftertreatment.PAO8cStwasconsideredamildeyeirritantinrabbits.
Inanotherstudy(12),9NZWrabbitsreceived0.1mLofAlkane5intotheconjunctivalsacoftherighteyeand3ofthemwerewashedwithwaterat30secaftertreatment. Theeyeswereexaminedat1,24,48and72hoursafterinstillation. Conjunctivalrednesswasobservedinoneanimalat1houraftertreatmentanddisappearedby24hours. No oculareffectswereseeninotherrabbits. Alkane5wasnotaneyeirritantinrabbits.
ThenotifiedchemicalisnotconsideredaneyeirritantinrabbitsbasedonthemostrecentstudywhichwascompletedinMarch1995andwasincompliancewiththeOECDguideline(1987).
9.1.6SkinSensitisation(13)
TheskinsensitisationpotentialofPAO8cStwasstudiedinguineapigsusingamodifiedBuehlertest.
Agroupof10malealbinoHartleyguineapigswereinducedwith0.5mLofthetestmaterialeveryotherday(3times/week)for3weeks. Thesiteswereexaminedat24and48hoursaftereachapplication. Thechallengedose(0.5mL)wasapplied2weeksafterthelastinductiondose. Thereactionwasexaminedat24and48hoursafterchallenge.Apositivecontrolgroup(10animals)wassimilarlytreatedwith2,4-dinitro-1-chlorobenzenedilutedindistilledwater.
Eighttestanimalshadslighterythemaand2hadslightoedemaduringtheinductionphase. Noneofthetestanimalsrespondedtothechallengedose. Thepositivecontrolshowedthattheanimalscanbesensitisedbyaknownskinsensitiser. PAO8cStwasnotaskinsensitiseringuineapigs.
9.2RepeatedDoseToxicity(14)
Repeateddosestudyonthenotifiedchemicalwasnotconducted,butastudyonacloselyrelatedcompound,PAO2cStwasprovided.
YoungadultSDrats(6/sex/group)wereorallyadministeredOroniteXS101(PAO2cSt)at 0,200,500or1000mg/kg/dayfor29daysbygavage. Twoadditionalgroupsweresimilarlydosedwith0and1000mg/kg/day,respectively,andrecoveredfortwoweeksaftercessationofadministrationbeforebeingsacrificed.
Nodeathsortreatment-relatedclinicalsignswereobservedinthecontrolandtestanimals. Therewerenochangesinbodyweightgain,feedconsumption,haematologyorclinicalchemistry. Organweightswerenotaffectedbytreatment. Notreatment-relatedmacroscopicormicroscopicchangesweredetected. Thetestcompoundwasoflowtoxicityinratsbyrepeateddosingforupto29days.
9.3Genotoxicity
Genotoxicitystudiesonthenotifiedchemicalwerenotconducted,butstudiesonacloselyrelatedcompound,PAO2cSt,wereprovided.
9.3.1SalmonellatyphimuriumandEscherichia coliReverseMutationAssays(14)SalmonellatyphimuriumTA98,TA1537,TA100andTA1535andEscherichiacoliWP2uvrA were cultured with 0.1 - 10 mg/plate of Oronite XS 101 (PAO 2 cSt) with and without metabolicactivationusingratliverS9. Atthehighestconcentration,thetestmaterialwassuspendedinthevehicle(acetone),butatalllowerconcentrations,thetestmaterialappearedtobemisciblewiththesolvent. Alldoselevelswereplatedintriplicate. Solventandpositivecontrolswererunconcurrently. Inthepositivecontrols,2-aminoanthrocenewasusedinthepresenceofS9inallthestrains.IntheabsenceofS9,2-nitrofluorenewasusedinstrainT98,sodiumazideinstrainsTA100andTA1535,andICR-191instrains TA 1537 and WP2 uvrA.
Noreproducibleincreasesinmutantfrequencywereobservedinthetreatedgroups. Thepositivecontrolsproducedmarkedincreasesinmutantfrequencyinalltheteststrains.
Thetestconcentrationswerenotcytotoxictoanystrain. Undertheconditionoftheassay,PAO2cStwasnotmutagenicintheSalmonellatyphimuriumandEscherichiacolireversemutationassays.
9.3.2MicronucleusAssayintheBoneMarrowCellsoftheMouse(15)
YoungadultSwissalbinomice(18-21/sex/group)wereintraperitoneallyadministered1250,2500or5000mg/kg(thehighestpracticaldose)ofOroniteXS101(PAO2cSt),
suspendedinpeanutoil. Avehiclecontrolgroup(18/sex)received4000mg/kgofpeanutoilonly,andapositivecontrolgroup(5/sex)wastreatedwith0.25mg/kgoftriethylenemelamine. Bonemarrowwascollectedfrom10animals(5/sex)fromeachtreatmentandvehiclecontrolgroupatapproximately24,48and72hoursafteradministration. Positivecontrolsweresampledat24hours. Twobonemarrowsmearsweremadefromeachanimaland1000polychromaticerythrocyteswerescoredformicronuclei.
Noclinicalsignsoftoxicitywereobservedduringthestudy. Cytotoxicitywasdetectedinmalesinthepositivecontrolandatthe1250mg/kgdoselevelsampledat24hoursandinfemalesatthe2500and5000mg/kgdoselevelssampledat48hours. Nosignificantincreaseinthenumberofmicronucleatedpolychromaticerythrocyteswasobservedin thetreatedanimals. Thepositivecontrolinducedmicronucleiasexpected. PAO2cStdidnotcausechromosomaldamageinbonemarrowcellsofthemousein vivo.
9.4OverallAssessmentofToxicologicalData
Alltheacutestudiesexceptfortheinhalationaltoxicitystudywereperformedwiththenotifiedchemical. Theacuteinhalationaltoxicity,repeateddosetoxicityandgenotoxicitystudieswereconductedwithacloselyrelatedcompoundPAO2cSt. ThetoxicitystudiesonPAO2cStcanbeusedtoassessthetoxicityofthehomopolymer,whichhasarelativelyhighermolecularweight.
Basedonthestudiessubmitted,thenotifiedchemicalwasoflowacuteoraltoxicityinratsandlowdermaltoxicityinrabbits. Itwasnotaskinirritantinrabbitsoraskinsensitiseringuineapigsbutwasamildeyeirritantinrabbits. Toxicitybyinhalationisunlikelyduetothehigherviscosityofthenotifiedchemical(7-9cStat100°C)comparedtothedimer(2cSt at 100°C),theriskofaerosolsbeinggeneratedbeingnegligible. Thedatadoesdemonstratehoweverthepotentialforsignificantinjuryresultingfromanyinhalationintothe respiratory tract.Based on the study on PAO 2 cSt, it is expected that repeated administrationofupto1000mg/kg/dayfor29dayswouldnotproduceanyobservedadverseeffectsinrats. Itisnotexpectedtocausereversemutationinbacteriaorcausechromosomaldamageinmousebonemarrowcells.
Onthebasisofthetoxicitydataprovided,thenotifiedchemicalisnotclassedashazardousaccordingtoWorksafeAustralia’sApprovedCriteriaforClassifyingHazardousSubstances(16).
10.ASSESSMENTOFENVIRONMENTALEFFECTSTable2.Ecotoxicity test results for Oronite XS 101
11.Design elementSpeciesTestResult
RainbowTrout(Oncorhynchusmykiss)
96hour acute
LC501000mg/La
Water Flea (Daphniamagna)48hour
acute
EC50=230mg/La
Algae (Selenastrumcapricornutum)
72hourForgrowthstimulation(0-
72 hour): EC501000mg/La
a. Resultbasedonnominalconcentrations,althoughtestwasconductedwiththewatersolublefraction.
EcotoxicitystudieswereconductedusingOroniteXS101(aC10polyalphaolefindimerwithasimilarmonomercompositionasAlkane5)accordingtoUSEPAorOECDguidelines(Table2). Thetestconcentrationsarenominalconcentrationsonly,withthewatersolublefractionused. OroniteXS101wasaddeddirectlytothetestwatertogive thecorrectconcentrationifallwoulddissolve. Thesolution/emulsionwasthenstirredfor20hours,andallowedtosettlefor4hours. Therequiredtestsolutionwasthensiphonedoffintotestvessels,avoidinganysurfacefilm. ThedegreetowhichPAO2cStdidnotdissolvewasnotrecorded,althoughalltestsolutionsremainedclearforthedurationofthe test.
Theresultsindicatethatthepolyolefinispracticallynontoxic,withthelowestEC50of230mg/Lforwaterflea. Infact,mortalityseemedtobeassociatedwiththepresenceofanoilyfilm,presumablyfrompartitioningofthepolyolefinoutofsolutionathigherconcentrations(loadings).
ThenotifiergaveaNOELof19mg/L,althoughthesublethalandlethaleffectsobserveddidnotappeartofollowadose-responseandwereofalowlevel(mortality10%atLOELandhigherconcentrations). Algaetoxicitywasassociatedwithallnominalconcentrations,butstimulatedgrowthandwiththeEC50remainingabove1000mg/L.
Althoughthereissomeuncertaintywithactualconcentrationsusedinthetests,theEPAexpectsthatOroniteXS101wouldbepracticallynon-toxicuptothelimitofitssolubility.SincethesolubilityofAlkane5islikelytobelessthanOroniteXS101becauseofitsgreatermolecularweightandsizeitstoxicitymaybehigher(17). However,determiningwhetheritismoretoxicisproblematic(17). Thus,thetoxicitywillbeaffectedbythesolubilityandthelogPowofeachcomponent,thedegreeofbranching(branchedalkaneslesstoxicthanstraightalkanes)andthedegreeofvolatilisationofthatcomponent,andinteractionsbetweencomponents.
12.ASSESSMENTOFENVIRONMENTALHAZARD
Alkane5willbeusedasabaseforautomotiveandindustrialoilblends. Themainexposurewillbefrominappropriatedisposalofoil. Calculationsshowanextremelyhighdilutionforthepolymerisstillexpectedevenifallofthe35% ofoilnotcollectedinAustraliafromhomeuserswasdisposedoftoacountrysewer. Togetherwithits
expecteddistributionthroughretailcentresacrossAustralia(ienotconcentratedinonetownorcity),andwithgoodindustrialandpublicpractice,significantaquaticexposuretothepolymerisnotexpected.
EcotoxicitytestsshowedthatforalowmolecularpolyalphaolefinwithasimilarmonomercompositionasAlkane5(OroniteXS101),thechemicalisexpectedtobepracticallynon-toxictoaquaticorganismsuptothelimitofitssolubility.
Also,theconcentrationofAlkane5inthesoilorwatercompartmentwillbefurtherreducedasitwasshowntobereadilybiodegradable.
13.ASSESSMENTOFPUBLICANDOCCUPATIONALHEALTHANDSAFETYEFFECTS
BasedonthedatagivenforAlkane5,thereislowpotentialacuteoralanddermaltoxicitywhilethereisapotentialslightskinirritationandmoderateeyeirritation. Itmaycausemoderateacuteinhalationaltoxicityhoweverthereislittlepotentialforsensitisation,repeatdosetoxicity,mutationorchromosomaldamage.
Thereexistpotentiallysignificanthealthrisksfrominhalationandeyeexposure. ThetransferofAlkane5frombulkstoragetosteeldrums,transfertoblendingtanks, samplingandanalysisofAlkane5,cleaningandpackagingallowsthepotentialforoccupationalexposurebysplashingorspillagetoan80-100%formulationforatleast30minutes,50daysayear. Thepackagingofthefinishedblendedlubricantisperformedbyautomatedmachineryandsupervisedfromtwometresaway,therebyreducingtheriskofexposure. SomelowexposuretoresidualAlkane5mayoccurduringtheapplicationoflabelsandbungstothedrums. Thecleaningofblendingvesselsandequipmentwithlubeoilandthesamplingandanalysisoftheblendedlubricantshasalsothepotentialforoccupationalexposurefromsplashingorspillage. Adequatepersonalprotection suchasgloves,shoes,eyeprotection,protectiveclothingandrespiratoryprotectivedevicesarerequiredatthisstagetoreducetheriskofinhalationoreyecontact.
Whenlubricantscontainingthenotifiedchemicalareusedinfoodpackagingandprocessingequipment,incidentalcontactwithfoodcanoccur,butcontaminationoffoodwiththelubricantsisminimal. Animalstudiesonacloselyrelatedcompoundshowedthatthenotifiedchemicalisexpectedtobeoflowtoxicitybyrepeatedoraladministrationandisnotgenotoxic. Infrequentandslightcontaminationoffoodwiththenotifiedchemicalisnotconsideredasignificanthazardtopublichealth.
Whenusedinautomotiveengineoilwhichisavailabletothepublicthroughretailers,publicexposurecanoccur. Duringoilchanges,theusermaybedermallyexposedtothenotifiedchemical,butthecontactwouldbeshortandinfrequent. Animalstudiesshowedthatthenotifiedchemicalisoflowdermaltoxicityandnotaskinirritantinrabbits. Thus,shortdermalexposuretothenotifiedchemicalshouldnothavesignificanthealtheffects.Anyaccidentalsplashingintotheeyeisnotexpectedtoresultinseriousdamagetotheeyes. Inanimalstudies,thenotifiedchemicalwasamildirritantinrabbitsandtheeffectsdisappearedwithin48hoursaftertreatment. Therefore,publicuseoftheengineoil
containingapproximately80%ofthenotifiedchemicalisnotexpectedtoresultinsignificantadversehealtheffectsprovidedcontactwitheyescanbeavoided.
Themainoccupationalhealthriskposedtoautomobilemechanicsisskinirritation,followingrepeatedexposuretothenotifiedchemicalinengineoil. Aspreviouslydiscussed,accidentaleyecontactislikelytocausediscomfort,butnoseriousdamagetoeyes.
Theincompletecombustionproductsemittedfromautomobilesaresimilartothosefromthecombustionofgasoline,butthelevelsareverylowandnotdistinguishablefromthefuelderivedcombustionproducts,whichwilldominatethehydrocarbonemissions. Suchuseofthenotifiedchemicalisnotexpectedtoposeahealthhazardtothepublic.
Alkane5willnotposeasignificanthazardtopublichealthwhenusedintheproposedmanner.
14.RECOMMENDATIONS
TominimiseoccupationalexposuretoAlkane5thefollowingguidelinesandprecautionsshouldbeobserved:
- TheappropriaterespiratorydeviceshouldbeselectedandusedinaccordancewithAustralian/NewZealandStandard(AS/NZS)1715(18)andshouldcomplytoAS/NZS1716(19)ifventilationisinadequate;
- EyeprotectionshouldbeselectedandfittedinaccordancewithAustralianStandard(AS)1336(20)andusedinaccordancewithAS/NZS1337(21);
- IndustrialclothingmustconformtothespecificationsdetailedinAS2919(22)andAS3765.1(23);
- IndustrialglovesshouldconformtothestandardsdetailedinAS2161(24)andAS3765.1(23);
- AlloccupationalfootwearshouldconformtothestandardsdetailedinAS/NZS2210(25);
- Particularcareshouldbetakentoavoidspillageorsplashingofthenotifiedchemical;
- Goodpersonalhygieneshouldbepractisedtominimisethepotentialforingestion;
- AcopyoftheMSDSshouldbeeasilyaccessibletoemployees;
- Automobileengineoilcontainingdecene/dodecenehydrogenatedtrimershouldcarrythefollowingwarningstatements:
Avoid contact with eyes Washhandsafteruse.
15.MATERIALSAFETYDATASHEET
TheMSDSforAlkane5wasprovidedinanacceptableformat(26).
16.REQUIREMENTSFORSECONDARYNOTIFICATION
Under theIndustrialChemicals(NotificationandAssessment)Act1989,secondarynotificationofAlkane5shallberequiredifanyofthecircumstancesstipulatedundersubsection64(2)oftheActarise. Ifconditionsofusearevaried,greaterexposureofthepublictotheproductmayoccur. Insuchcircumstancesfurtherinformationmayberequiredtoassessthehazardstopublichealth.
17.REFERENCES
1.Lyman,WJ,Reehl,WFRosenblatt,DH,1982,HandbookofChemical PropertyEstimationMethods. McGraw-HillBookCompany,NewYork.p2-39.
2.AustralianandNewZealandEnvironmentCouncil,1991,Usedlubricatingoil:Generation,recoveryandreuseinAustralia.PreparedbyTechnisearchLtdfortheWasteandResourcesCommittee(WRAC).
3.Cisson,CM,Rausina,GAStonebraker,PM,(submittedtoLubricationScience).Human health and environmental hazard characterisation of lubricating oiladditives.
4.Connel,DW,1989,GeneralCharacteristicsoforganiccompoundswhichexhibitbioaccumulation, Chapter3,inConnelDW(ed)"Bioaccumulationofxenobioticcompounds". CRCPress,BocaRaton,USA.p56.
5.Guiney, PD, 1982,Acutetoxicityassessmentofpolyalphaolefin(PAO)syntheticfluids. SymposiumOnSyntheticAndPetroleumBasedLubricants,AmericanChemicalSociety,LasVegas,,p381-391.
6.Driscoll,R,1995,Alkane5(C1527-04-5):acuteoraltoxicityintherat.
SafepharmLaboratoriesLtd(Derby,UK),ProjectNo:703/14.
7.Driscoll,R,1995,Alkane5(C1527-04-5):acutedermaltoxicityintherat.
SafepharmLaboratoriesLtd(Derby,UK),ProjectNo:703/15.
8.Ulrich, CE, 1982, SF-0203-41:Acuteinhalationtoxicity(LC50) study in rats.InternationalResearchandDevelopmentCorporation,StudyNo.107-006.
9.Salame,R,1994,:AnevaluationoftheacutetoxicityofaninhalednebulisedaerosolformulationofOroniteSynfluidPAO2cSt(C1234-01-1)inthealbinorat(safetytest). Bio-ResearchLaboratoriesLtd,ProjectNo:90907.
10Driscoll,R,1995,Alkane5(C1527-04-5):primaryskinirritationtestintherabbit. SafepharmLaboratoriesLtd(Derby,UK),ProjectNo:703/16.
11.Draize,JH,1959,Paper,Assoc.FoodDrugOfficials,US,Topeka, Kansas,p49.
12.DriscollR,1995, Alkane5(C1527-04-5):primaryeyeirritationtestintherabbit. SafepharmLaboratoriesLtd(Derby,UK),ProjectNo:703/17.
13.Cooper,PN,Rogers,BC.andWong,ZA,1989, Four-weekrepeated-dosetoxicitystudyinratswithOroniteXS101(KWA88-01217). ChevronEnvironmentalHealthandToxicology,ReportNo:CEHC3050.
14.Myers,M,Machado,MLandWong,ZA,1989,Microbial/microsomereversemutationplateincorporationassaywithOroniteXS101(KWA88-01217). ChevronEnvironmentalHealthandToxicology,ReportNo:CEHC 3048.
15.Wing,CD,Machado,MLandWong,ZA,1989,MicronucleusassayinmousebonemarrowerythrocyteswithOroniteXS101(KWA88-01217). ChevronEnvironmentalHealthandToxicology,ReportNo:CEHC3049.
16.WorksafeAustralia,1994,ApprovedCriteriaForClassifyingHazardousSubstances[NOHSC:1008(1994)],AGPS, Canberra.
17.Peterson,DR 1994. Calculatingtheaquatictoxicityofhydrocarbonmixtures.Chemosphere29,2493-2506.
18.StandardsAustralia,StandardsNewZealand,1994,Australian/NewZealandStandard1715-1994Selection,UseandMaintenanceofRespiratoryProtectiveDevices.StandardsAssociationofAustraliaPubl.,Sydney,Australia,StandardsAssociationofNewZealandPubl.Wellington,NewZealand.
19.StandardsAustralia,1991,AustralianStandard1716-1991RespiratoryProtectiveDevices,StandardsAssociationofAustraliaPubl.,Sydney,Australia.
20.StandardsAustralia,1994,AustralianStandard1336-1994,RecommendedPracticesforEyeProtectionintheIndustrialEnvironment.,StandardsAssociationof Australia Publ. Sydney, Australia.
21.StandardsAustralia,StandardsNewZealand1992,Australian/NewZealandStandard1337-1992,EyeProtectorsforIndustrialApplications,StandardsAssociationofAustraliaPubl.,Sydney,Australia,StandardsAssociationofNewZealandPubl.Wellington,NewZealand.
22.StandardsAustralia,1987,AustralianStandard2919-1987IndustrialClothing,
StandardsAssociationofAustraliaPubl.,Sydney,Australia.
23.StandardsAustralia,1990,AustralianStandard3765-1990ClothingforProtectionAgainstChemicalHazards,Part1ProtectionAgainstGeneralorSpecificChemicals,Part2LimitedProtectionAgainstSpecificChemicals,StandardsAssociationofAustraliaPubl.,Sydney,Australia.
24.StandardsAustralia,1978,AustralianStandard2161-1978,IndustrialSafetyGlovesandMittens(excludingElectricalandMedicalGloves),StandardsAssociationofAustraliaPubl.,Sydney,Australia.
25.StandardsAustralia,StandardsNewZealand1994,Australian/NewZealandStandard2210-1994OccupationalProtectiveFootwear,Part1:GuidetoSelection,CareandUse. Part2:Specifications,StandardsAssociationofAustraliaPubl.,Sydney,Australia,StandardsAssociationofNewZealandPubl.Wellington,NewZealand.
26.NationalOccupationalHealthandSafetyCommission1994,NationalCode ofPracticeforthePreparationofMaterialSafetyDataSheets[NOHSC:2011(1994)], AustralianGovernmentPublishingService,Canberra.