Dear Mr. Brown and Mr. Icke,
I’m taking a class at the University of Minnesota and I have read some of your work. The articles I read where entitled, “The Ruling Class,” “The Illuminati Ruling Class Conspiracy,” and “The Secret Government.” After reading all these articles very carefully, I went through them and thought about the different points you two have pointed out. I enjoyed reading your theories on different subjects, but I find some of them hard to believe and I questioned them.
First off, I would like to share my opinions and reflections to Mr. Brown. In your article, “The Ruling Class,” you talk about the conspiracies associated with President Clinton. One of which saying that he was pre-elected. It kind of makes me feel like an idiot. It makes me feel like us, as citizens have been played for so long. When you think about it, this must have been decided when President Clinton attended Oxford University more than twelve years ago! If that’s true, then the US citizens basically have no say in the presidential elections at all. It turns out we aren’t as free as we thought we were. Millions of Americans would be outraged if this was the truth.
In another part of your article, you talk about the Princess Diana situation. This article talked about her supposed assassination. You think that the MI-6 could have assassinated her. The reasons for this could have been Diana’s Muslim love-interest. A non-white king was said to be unthinkable and would have lead to the sinking of “The Firm,” (The Windsor’s.) It is interesting to ponder the fact that the MI-6 could have actually planned something as drastic as that to keep the Windsor name. It makes you wonder why they didn’t just assassinate the Muslim man. You also brought some new ideas to light with the evidence of the white Fiat. I always figured there were just more of the paparazzi in it, but thinking deeper, like you suggest it may have been several MI-6 assassins. It’s very interesting to think about.
Many of your articles are interesting to think about, especially in “The Illuminati Ruling Class Conspiracy.” These articles seem more far-fetched than the rest of them. You talk about a society of Illuminati freemasons ruling the United States. You say this group was connected with Satanism and having goals concerned with only themselves. Thinking that out founding fathers and members of the Boston Tea party were part of the Freemasons group and worshipped the devil is a bit out there to me. It’s hard to believe what you say is true. I mean, you have coincidental material about the marks of the devil on the dollar bill. I think if you look hard enough for what you want to find, you will find it eventually no matter how much stuff you have to make up. In the example that the number 666 is found by arranging the Roman numerals of 1776, that is just crazy. Do you think the Illuminati and the United States waited until this year to be formed just because you can somehow get the devil’s number out of it? I think not.
I also think it’s completely ridiculous about how Washington DC was designed to represent the French Masonic Templar splayed cross. Besides that cross, there are many other shapes. I’m pretty sure this is coincidence. Also, it wouldn’t make sense that the designer of Washington DC was a black man. It wouldn’t make sense that freemasons would associate with a black man.
Moving on, I would like to share and question some of Mr. Icke’s things written in “The Secret Government.” Mr. Icke, when you talk about how Jimmy Carter’s election was rigged because he was a member of the Trilateral Commission, again, I really wondered about how much control the citizens actually have over an election. You said he was elected by “…the whole Elite network of money, media, and dirty tricks” (Icke P. 174.) I am eager to know what kinds of “dirty tricks” were used and how the money was used to aid in his election. Were there bribes? I understand that Carter was the Trilateral Commission’s tool. Didn’t anyone ever notice this?
I would also like to discuss a few things from The Club of Rome and the Environmental Movement. When you talk about how Auerlio Peccei’s computer that gave results of a rapidly declining environment was rigged, that really makes me think. The elite will do anything they can to manipulate the people and try to make them their slaves. They feed the people lies “…by painting a global picture of overpopulation, resource and food shortages, and environmental dangers which, it estimated, would cause the deaths of at least 170 million people by the year 2000.” (Icke P.177.) (keep in mind that was in 1980!) They do this by making several nations worried and eager to try and fix this “problem.” This, then draws different nations closer to each other, thus forming a true global elite.
Going on to talk about more ways to achieve a global elite, you mention The Club of Rome and Population Control. If these things you say are true, I am completely shocked by them. I was especially shocked by the statement: “Wars have been used blatantly and without mercy to enforce population control in non-white countries.” (Icke P.184.) As for the genocide by Pol Pot in Cambodia, I can’t believe it! How could anyone do such a thing? It’s very hard to believe that an army would just eliminate thirty percent of a country’s population just to control the population. There just has to be more to it than that.
I would like to thank you two fine conspiracy theorists on writing articles that made me think deeper about things. I admit, I had a tough time believing some of them, and others shocked me! I’d like to give you guys some recognition for thinking up some crazy things and not being afraid to say what you think.
Sincerely,
Ryan Welshinger
1