The Python Papers Monograph xxx
A Sample of the Title of this Monograph
First Author's or Editor's Name
First Author's Institutional Affiliation
Second Author's or Editor's Name
Second Author's Institutional Affiliation
The Python Papers Monograph
ISSN 1837-7092
A periodical of The Python Papers Anthology
© Copyright 20xx by The Python Papers Anthology and the individual authors
This work is copyright under the Creative Commons 2.5 license subject to Attribution, Noncommercial and Share-Alike conditions. The full legal code may be found at
The Python Papers Anthology was first published in 2006 in Melbourne, Australia.
For information:
The Python Papers Anthology Editorial Committee
email:
Website:
Co-Editors-in-Chief: Maurice Ling
Tennessee Leeuwenburg
Associate Editors:
Andreas SchreiberSarah Mount
Guilherme PoloGuy K. Kloss
Mike DewhirstRichard Jones
Chetan Giridhar
Editorial Reviewers: Raymond Hettinger
Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Technical Reviewers for this Monograph
XXXX
XXXX
Table of Contents
Series Editor's Introduction...... 1
Technical Reviewers...... 2
About the Author...... 3
Acknowledgement...... 4
1. Introduction ...... 5
1.1. Sub-section of Introduction...... 5
1.1.1. Sub-Subsection of Introduction...... 5
1.1.1.1. Sub-sub-Subsection of Introduction...... 5
2. The Bulk of Materials...... 6
3. References...... 7
I. Appendix A...... 7
Specific Peer Review Process for The Python Papers Monograph...... 8
Series Editor's Introduction
This page is written by Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editor of The Python Papers Anthology to introduce this monograph. Allows 2 page for this.
Technical Reviewers
FirstnameA LastnameA: Short biography of Technical Reviewer A
FirstnameB LastnameB: Short biography of Technical Reviewer A
FirstnameC LastnameC: Short biography of Technical Reviewer A
About the Author
Short biograph of the author – not more than one page.
Acknowledgement
Statement of acknowledgement. Not more than one page.
A Sample of the Title of this Monograph
First Author's or Editor's Name
First Author's Institutional Affiliation
Contact email
Second Author's or Editor's Name
Second Author's Institutional Affiliation
Contact email
1.Introduction
This is the introduction chapter. One line spacing before the subsection. You may have a synopsis or abstract before Introduction – it should be 2 lines spaces after the contact email of the last author.
1.1.Sub-section of Introduction
This is the subsection of introduction. One line spacing before the sub-section.
1.1.1.Sub-Subsection of Introduction
This is the sub-subsection of introduction. One line spacing before the sub-section.
1.1.1.1. Sub-sub-Subsection of Introduction
This is the sub-sub-subsection of introduction. Please try not to go beyond this. Two lines spacing before the next chapter.
2.The Bulk of Materials
This is bulk of the materials – repeat as needed.
Each paragraph is separated by an empty line.
This is an example of reference with a single author (Glenn, 2005), two authors (Hao and Naiman, 2007), more than 2 authors (Voon et al., 1995). Multiple references should be separated by semi-colon (Glenn, 2005; Hao and Naiman, 2007).
In-line codes should be in Courier font, size 10, as shown here:
class Poisson:
mean = 0.0
def __init__(self, lamb = 0.0):
self.mean = lamb
def PDF(self, x):
return math.exp(self.mean)* \
pow(self.mean,x)/self.factorial(x)
Table 2.1. Title of Table.
Figure 2.1. Caption of Figure.
3.References
Referencing should follow Harvard Style, in alphabetical order of first author.
I. Appendix A
Appendices are numbered in Roman numerals.
Specific Peer Review Process for The Python Papers Monograph
The Python Papers Monograph (ISSN under application) is a publication under The Python Papers Anthology. This monograph series provides a refereed format for publication of monograph-length reports including dissertations, conference proceedings, case studies, advanced-level lectures, and similar material of theoretical or empirical importance. It does so quickly, informally and at a high level, where the Python programming language is an integral aspect.
In some cases, the timeliness of a manuscript is more important than its form, which may be unfinished or unpolished. Hence, it is possible that proofs may be outlined with an intention to publish elsewhere at a later date.
Refereeing is done by members of the The Python Papers Anthology Editorial Committee and other authorities in the topic concerned and may be acknowledged in name in the published form. Scientific quality is the over-riding criterion for refereeing.
The full editorial policy of The Python Papers Anthology can be found at