Title 24 United States Code, Chapter 10, Armed Forces Retirement Home

Hospitals & Asylums

Title 24 United States Code, Chapter 10, Armed Forces Retirement Home

Proposed Part 3 Peace Treaties §446-448

World Court © Spring Equinox Edition 2003, 1 Iraqi Dead = $1 million 24USC(10)§420

Koran

Warrants andReports

§446 Afghanistan & Iraq 1

I. United Nations 2

II. United States 13

III. Afghanistan 19

IV. Iraq 26

§447 Korea 45

V. United Nations 46

VI. North Korea 53

VII. South Korea 60

VIII. Single Korean Yearbook 63

§448 Palestinian Israeli Territories 70

IX. Israel 71

X. Palestine 84

XI. United States 89

Appendix Perseid Meteors 90

Kings: Former King Zahir Shah, President George Bush II, President Saddam Hussein, National Defense Commissioner Kim Jong Il, President Yasser Arafat

Hospitals & Asylums Writer: Anthony J. Sanders,

Prohibition of Murder

World Court[1]

International Court of Justice. Peace Palace, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands

International Criminal Court.. P.O. Box 19519, 2500 CM. The Hague, ND

______Hamid Karzai, Interim President of Afghanistan,

Embassy of Afghanistan, PO Box 155, Deakin West ACT 2600, Australia. & Saddam Hussein, President of Iraq, Iraqi Foundation 1012 14 St. NW, Suite 1110, Washington, DC 20005 USA Vs. George Bush, President of the United States of America The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500, USA US Senate Foreign Relations. 306 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington D.C. 20510-1401

Secretary of Defense, 1000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1000

Supreme Court Clerk, Washington DC, 20543-0001 ______

U.N. Security Council. Room S-3520, United Nations, New York, NY 10017 USA UNMOVIC. Room S-3120 New York, NY 10017 USA The World Bank, 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433 USA ______Hospitals & Asylums[2]. Anthony J. Sanders. 2601 Melrose Ave. B-100, Cincinnati, Ohio 45206, USA , introducing $10 billion Legal Fines

Peace Treaty

I. United Nations

A. Quo Warranto...... 2

B. UNMOVIC…………………………………………………………..………..3

C. Laws of War ………..……………………………………………….………...5

D. Disarmament…………………………………………………….…………….6

II. United States

A. Historical Introduction.…………………………………………….………….13

B. Armed Forces Retirement Home….…………………………………………..16

C. Defense Contract……………………………………………….………...... 18

III. Afghanistan

A. Historical Introduction…………………………………………………….....19

B. Constitutional Banking……………………………………………………….22

C. Real International Base………………………………………………………25

IV. Iraq

A. Historical Introduction………………………………………………………..26

B. Peace….………...... ……………………………………………………...... … 30

C. Coronation al Saddam Hussein….……...…………………………………….31

I. UNITED NATIONS

The Koran is quoted in acceptance of the mercy AlLaw in Rangers,

[37.53] What! when we are dead and have become dust and bones, shall we then be certainly brought to judgment?
[37.54] He shall say: Will you look on?
[37.55] Then he looked down and saw him in the midst of hell.
[37.56] He shall say: By Allah! you had almost caused me to perish;
[37.57] And had it not been for the favor of my Lord, I would certainly have been among those brought up.
[37.58] Is it then that we are not going to die,
[37.59] Except our previous death? And we shall not be chastised?
[37.60] Most surely this is the mighty achievement.
[37.61] For the like of this then let the workers work. [37.62] Is this better as an entertainment or the tree of Zaqqum?
[37.63] Surely We have made it to be a trial to the unjust.
[37.64] Surely it is a tree that-grows in the bottom of the hell;
[37.65] Its produce is as it were the heads of the serpents.
[37.66] Then most surely they shall eat of it and fill (their) bellies with it.

A. Quo Warranto

The Quo Warranto[3]proceedings of Iraq, Afghanistan and the United States must be settled before the Security Council and International Court of Justice before international war spreads from Afghanistan to Iraq. The current situation with massive amounts of US troops menacing Iraq under the command of US President George Bush II who speaks of nothing but how much he wants to murder more poor people. He must be convicted and impeached for his crimes in accordance with Article 1§ 3 (7) by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and 2/3 of the Senate so that he can contemplate the US kingdom in peace. George Bush has not met the reasonable demand for Peace Talks with Saddam Hussein and is probably not competent to come to any rational conclusions, although with the guidance of this peace treaty his government might be, Saddam Hussein, however, has kept the Peace for 10 years, and speaks of peace to this day, he is the leading electoral candidate for King of New Iraq when the New Iraq Constitutional Estate has been approved by the Iraqi National Council[4].

The UN Security Council is therefore called upon to exercise their authority to call for a cease fire, withdrawal of troops without a truce and forfeiture of US military bases in the Persian Gulf to local nations before the fighting begins due to the severe breaches in international law we are forced to witness every day in the news and their duty to keep the peace. The Security Council must not permit the extermination of their defendants by well known mass murders. The court may under Article 36 of the Statute ofthe Court[5] interpret this treaty, settle questions of international law, establish breaches of international obligation and determine the nature and extent of reciprocal reparations required for peace. The Parties are called upon to ratify this peace treaty in accordance with Article 30 of the Rules of the Court[6] - the U.S. President and 2/3 of the Senate present in accordance with Article 1§2(2) of the U.S. Constitution[7], and upon the consent of the Revolutionary Command Council in accordance with Article 37 of the Iraqi Interim Constitution[8] and the introduction of the President and consent of the Loya Jirga in accordance with Article 141 of the 1990 Constitution of Afghanistan[9]. Interpretations of Peace Treaties[10] and United States v. Yugoslavia encourage the United Nations to respond swiftly to conflicts to prevent more military disasters[11]. The ratification of 20 nations may enter this peace treaty into force against the objection of the US, Afghanistan or Iraq as did not occur in the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects.

The court is called upon to judge the Legality of the Use of Force[12] and establish truces on the basis of the Conditions of Admission for a State to Membership to the United Nations[13] enumerated in Article 4 (1) of the Charter as (1) a State; (2) peace-loving; (3) must accept the obligations of the Charter; (4) must be able to carry out these obligations; (5) must be willing to do so[14]. The United Nations admitted the United States on 24 Oct. 1945, Iraq on 21 Dec. 1945, and Afghanistan on Nov. 1946all of these nationshave an inalienable right to be respected as equals before the United Nations. Should the US not be compliant it would be reasonable to remove their Permanent Vote from the Security Council for a specific length of time.

In 2003 after the astounding success of 10 Eastern European nations to be admitted to the European Union the court has sought to improve the recognition of nations of people who have limited membership such as the Marsh Arabs, Palestinian and Kurdish people. We pray the peace treaties of the Korean, Kurdish, Marsh Arab, Iraqi, Afghani and Palestinian people will be honored with injunctive relief secured from the United States Department of Defense by the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund and the World Bank in accordance with Title 24 U.S. Code (10)§419 (a) (4), Title 10 U.S. Code§2772, and the judgment of the United Nations and United States.

B. UNMOVIC

The United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) was created through the adoption of Security Council resolution 1284[15] of 17 December 1999. UNMOVIC is paid for be the nation of Iraq by the order of the Security Council. The mission is to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction (chemical weapons, biological weapons and missiles with a range of more than 150 km), and to operate a system of ongoing monitoring and verification to check Iraq’s compliance with its obligations not to reaquire the same weapons prohibited to it by the Security Council and destroyed by UNSCOM and the nation of Iraq[16]. The director Hans Blix was the director of the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA) from 1993-1997.

After the adoption of the resolution 1441 (2002) on Friday 8 November 2002 the first group of UNMOVIC and IAEA inspectors arrived in Baghdad. The Iraqi side assures us that Iraq intends to provide full cooperation with the implementation of Resolution 1441 (2002), while expecting correct and professional conduct from the inspecting organizations. On January 6, 2003 Hans Blix stated to the Security Council that no prohibited weapons had been discovered and that Iraq had complied with a request to disclose the names of 394 people who manufactured prohibited weapons during the Iran/Iraq War for interviews in foreign countries. UNMOVIC is also considering conducting high altitude surveillance of Iraq as a United States spy plane was shot down by Iraqi anti-aircraft in contravention to the OpenSkies[17] treaty, that is not yet enforced, permitting spy planes nearly unlimited access to airspace, this contractual right furthermore appears to be forfeit under Part IV Article 52 of the 1977 Geneva Convention[18] due to bombing missions by the United States that have claimed nearly 300 civilian lives since 2000. Arms experts said Monday, January 13, 2002 they could take up to a year to finish inspections in Iraq and Washington signaled it may be ready for war as soon as February or may wait until March[19]. On March 16th inspectors were evacuated from Baghdad on a plane to Cypress as the result of threat of war by an international co-alition. The admittance of weapons inspectors for the second time clearly demonstrates Saddam Hussein’s commitment to Peace, the US unfortunately did not honor the law and chose to lie with the fraudulent complaints of weapons of mass destruction while publicly stating they intend to use them against the Iraqi people without dialogue.

C. Laws of War

Pope John Paul II led a growing chorus of voices raised against war saying a conflict in the Gulf would be a ''defeat for humanity''[20] and continues to call for Peace. The disarmament dilemma appears to be that Iraq and weapons inspectors from UNSCOM, the former inspection regime, have reported that from a quantitative standpoint all prohibited weapons and materials have already been disposed of or destroyed. Koffi Annan stated on January 14, 2003 that he was “optimistic and hopeful, if we handle this situation right and the pressure is maintained we may be able to disarm peacefully without need to resort to war"[21].

The Protocol Additional to the Geneva Convention and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts[22] of 8 June 1977 is the pre-eminent law regarding warfare. Part III of the Convention sets forth in Article 35 (2) that it is prohibited to employ weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering. (3) it is prohibited to employ methods or means of warfare which are intended, or may be expected, to cause widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment. Whereas weapons of mass destruction are incapable of discriminating between civilians and non-civilians causing superfluous injury and unnecessary suffering to their victims there is therefore no Legal Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict[23] or any other weapon of mass destruction. Article 40 prohibits the order to kill all combatants as those hors de combat, unconscious or surrendering, must be given quarter.

Part IV Article 52 states that civilian objects shall not be the object of attacks. Annex I to the Geneva Convention orders that medical and civil relief personnel be issued standard identification cards printed in both English and the local language. To comply with Security Council resolutions the Iraqi government has terminated their biological, chemical and nuclear weapons corporations under Article 61 (1)(hi); (h) detection and marking of danger areas (i) decontamination and destroying prohibited materials; in co-operation with UNSCOM weapons inspectors. UNMOVIC is attempting to continue the mission but must expand their trusteeship to assume a more diplomatic role in the crisis.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court[24] should greatly expedite the prosecution of war crimes, terrorism, crimes against humanity and genocide with the appointment of judges for the court by the UN General Assembly this 2003 in the Hague. The aggression of the United States in the Middle East is best described in Article 7 as Crimes Against Humanity (ha) (h)Persecution against a group collectively identifiable on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural and religious grounds as Arabs that has escalated to (a)Murder[25].

Whereas the war in Afghanistan appears to be justified in its Security Council Resolution, not to be confused with the ideal resolution of a quo warranto to restore the Loya Jirga to the trust of the Afghani people. The threatened war against Iraq does not appear to be justified primarily due to the fact that Saddam Hussein publicly disarmed and the peaceful countries and people of the world have gathered in peaceful protest against the aggression of the United States.

The World Court is therefore called upon to exercise their jurisdiction over War Crimes under Article 25 (f) of the Rome Statute to hold the United States liable for their threatened attack of Iraq. The deployment of troops in the Persian Gulf defies reason due to a lack of diplomacy and respect for previous and current disarmament actions by the United Nations and is a serious threat to world peace. Article 25 (f) states,

Attempts to commit such a crime by taking action that commences its execution by means of a substantial step, but the crime does not occur because of circumstances independent of the person's intentions. However, a person who abandons the effort to commit the crime or otherwise prevents the completion of the crime shall not be liable for punishment under the Statute of the International Criminal Court for the attempt to commit that crime if that person completely and voluntarily gave up the criminal purpose.

To abandon the war effort and avoid criminal liability the United States must retire their troops from the Persian Gulf and focus on US disarmament and the savvy investment of defense funding in foreign assistance under Article 22 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights[26] to improve the social security of Iraq. To fully cooperate with the United Nations both the United States and Iraq are requested to help remunerate the Kurdish people, revitalize the Southern Marshes for the Marsh Arabs, empower the Iraqi National Congress to be elected to represent the Kurds to the Iraqi National Council and renovate the Babylonian ruins to improve tourism to Iraq. We pray that the United Nations will facilitate peace and guarantee that Iraq is no longer terrorized by the US.

D. DISARMAMENT

The issue of disarmament has become the pre-eminent issue of current diplomatic efforts. The goal is to reduce military arsenals, bases and weapons without infringing upon the rights of the State to defend themselves from murder. The United Nations Department of Disarmament Affairs was founded in 1982 by the General Assembly under Resolution 52/12 and operated until 1992 when it was disbanded, in 1998 it was re-established as an under-Secretariat. Jayantha Dhanapala, from Indonesia, is the current Under-Secretary General. The Department of Disarmament is structured into 5 branches. 1. The Under-Secretary and Conference Support Branch, 2. Weapons of Mass Destruction Branch, 3. Conventional Arms Branch, 4. Regional Disarmament Branch, 5. Monitoring, Database and Information Branch[27].

The President of the United States demands of the disarmament on Iraq is hippo critic as the US Department of Defense has not joined with the Unilateral Arms Reductions of recent years that was spearheaded by the biological and chemical weapons forfeitures of President Saddam Hussein to UNSCOM. US reticence to disarm has led to an increasing percentage of weapons and military expenditure that has risen to 35% of the world’s and is 25% of the US budget. The US arms confederacy began during the Reagan administration as the result of refusal to comply with the SALT II treaty. The US did enter into a nuclear weapon reduction treaty with Russia this 2003. The United States demands have proven to be the height of the world’s greatest arm’s trader’s fraud.

International treaties are considered valid on the basis of their adherence to the principles of human rights, Peace and the acceptance of state parties. When treaties are entered into force by a ratification of a significant number of states there becomes a right for the United Nations and State Parties to take action to remedy the breaches in law by states that are not Parties of any given convention. It is given to Justice to Judge the People’s adherence to the Laws of the UN General Assembly and the treaties amongst Nations.

The 1925 Geneva Protocol[28] established a Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. It states,

“asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices, has been justly condemned by the general opinion of the civilized world;”

Nuclear Weapons, Land Mines, Bacteriologic, Chemical Weapons, and Missiles with a range of over 150 km (prohibited to Iraq) and the Illicit Traffic in Small Arms (Prohibited in the OAS) have also come to be specifically prohibited. In fact all weapons of mass destruction are prohibited in general. Weapons owners and operators must be licensed by the State and held responsible for any bodily injury or death they incur. A declaration of war or other Judgment does not relieve any individual or State from liability for the crime of Murder or Aggression that may be tried in a court of the State that issues such license or arms such a laborer, the state may be tried in an International Court or by an international tribunal in accordance with these and other international laws.

The Antarctic Treaty of 1959 was entered into forced in 1961. To this day there are no declared military installations in Antarctica. Article 1 defends peaceful purposes before the International Court of Just-ice as,

Antarctica shall be used for peaceful purposes only. There shall be prohibited, inter alia, any measures of a military nature, such as the establishment of military bases and fortifications, the carrying out of military maneuvers, as well as the testing of any types of weapons is prohibited.

The Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies[29] was opened in 1979 and entered into force in 1984 State Parties must inform the Secretary Generalof the nature of all missions to the moon and outer-space to ensure that under Article 3 (1),