Exhibit 3a.2.12
Portfolio Evaluation
SPED 678 (NBPTS, 2007 Draft Standards)
Name of Teacher Candidate: ______
Evaluator: ______Date of Evaluation: ______
Evaluation Scale:
A - Target: 97-108
B -Acceptable:60-77 points
C -Unacceptable: less than 60 points (must be resubmitted) 0 (zero) – indicates no evidence of artifact
(Candidates identify specific projects that represent standards.)
NBPTS Standardsfor Exceptional Needs and Artifacts / Target(3) / Acceptable
(2) / Unacceptable or Missing
(0-1) / Score
Foundations for Effective Practice
I. Knowledge of Students
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 –
Foundations for Effective Practice
II. Knowledge of Law, Philosophy, and History
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 -
Foundations for Effective Practice
III. Diversity
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 –
NBPTS Standards for Exceptional Needs and Artifacts / Target
(3) / Acceptable
(2) / Unacceptable or Missing
(0-1) / Score
Foundations for Effective Practice Preparing for Student Learning
IV. Family Partnerships
Artifact #1 -
Artifact #2 –
Student Learning and Development
V. Assessment
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 –
Student Learning and Development
VI. Communication
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 –
Student Learning and Development
VII. Social Development and Behavior
Artifact #1 -
Artifact #2 –
NBPTS Standards for Exceptional Needs and Artifacts / Target
(3) / Acceptable
(2) / Unacceptable or Missing
(0-1) / Score
Student Learning and Development
VII. Social Development and Behavior
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 -
Student Learning and Development
VIII. Curriculum and Instruction
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 –
Student Learning and Development
IX. Learning Environment
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 –
Student Learning and Development
X. Instructional Resources
Artifact #1 –
Artifact # 2 –
NBPTS Standards for Exceptional Needs and Artifacts / Target
(3) / Acceptable
(2) / Unacceptable or Missing
(0-1) / Score
Role and Practices in the Learning Community
XI. Contributing to the Profession and to Education through Collaboration
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 –
Role and Practices in the Learning Community
XII. Family Partnerships
Artifact #1 –
Artifact #2 –
Professional Portfolio Presentation Rubric
Conceptual Framework / Target(3) / Acceptable (2) / Unacceptable
(0-1) / Score
Clarity (Professional, Effective) / Sequence of information is very well organized with use of specific and appropriate examples; clear transitions create a succinct and even flow / Sequence of information is well-organized for the most part, but more clarity with transitions is needed / Content is loosely connected, transitions lack clarity
Attention to Audience (Professional) / Engaged audience and held their attention throughout with enthusiasm, and clearly focused presentation / Engaged audience and held their attention most of the time by remaining on topic and presenting facts with enthusiasm / Little or no attempt to engage audience
Conceptual Framework / Target
(3) / Acceptable (2) / Unacceptable
(0-1) / Score
Speaking Skills (Professional) / Exceptional confidence with material displayed through poise, clear articulation, eye contact, and enthusiasm / Clear articulation of ideas, but apparently lacks confidence with material / Little eye contact; poor speaking skills (i.e.,monotone, too fast); speaker seemed uninterested in material
Personal Reflection (Reflective) / All Reflections include personal reactions that are descriptive and insightful and relate to the stated INTASC Principle. / Most Reflections include personal reactions that are descriptive and insightful and relate to the stated INTASC Principle. / Few Reflections include personal reactions that are descriptive and insightful and relate to the stated INTASC Principle.
Innovative (Innovative) / Artifacts demonstrate innovative and/or creative planning. / Some artifacts demonstrate innovative and/or creative planning. / There is no evidence of innovative and/or creative planning.
Evidence of Attention to Diversity (Diverse) / Many clear examples of attention to diverse learners / Some clear examples of attention to diverse learners / Little or no clear evidence of attention to diverse learners
Overall Portfolio Impact (Effective) / The portfolio demonstrates well the student's skills, abilities, and knowledge to potential employers. / The portfolio helps to demonstrate the student's skills, abilities, and knowledge to potential employers. / The portfolio does little to demonstrate the student's skills, abilities, and knowledge to potential employers.
Overall Portfolio Scores
Target (97 – 108 points) / Acceptable (76 – 96 points) / Unacceptable (Below 76)Comments:
1