References & Resources
Adelman, H. S. & Taylor, L. (1999). Addressing barriers to student learning: Systemic changes
at all levels. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 15, 251-254.
Bergan, J., & Kratochwill, T. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York: Plenum.
Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Hallahan, D. P. (2002). Specific learning disabilities: Building
consensus for identification and classification. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P.
Hallahan (Eds.) Identification of Learning Disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 791-
804). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies
for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press.
D’Alonzo, B. & Boggs, E.(1990). A review of the regular education initiative.Preventing
School Failure.35(1),18-23.
Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional
Children, 52, 219-232.
Deno, S. L. & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA:
Council for Exceptional Children.
Donovan, M. & Cross, C. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Dunn, L. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?
Exceptional Children, 23, 5 – 21.
Flesch, R. (1983). Why Johnny can’t read: And what you can do about it.New York, NY:
Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc.(Original work published 1955).
Fletcher, J., Coulter, W., Reschly, D., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Alternative approaches to the
definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals
of Dyslexia, 54(2), 304-331.
Fletcher, J., Foorman, B., Boudousquie, A., Barnes, M., Schatschneider, C. & Francis, D. (2002).
Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research based intervention oriented
approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27-63.
Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention
(and shouldn’t be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 129-136.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how
valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Bahr, M. (1990). Mainstream assistance teams: A scientific basis for the
art of consultation. Exceptional Children, 57(2),128-139.
Gravois, T. & Rosenfield, S. (2006). Impact of instructional consultation teams on the
disproportionate placement of minority students in special education. Remedial and
Special Education, 27(1), 42-52.
Gresham, F. M. (2002). Teaching social skills to high-risk children and youth: Preventive and
remedial strategies. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner, (Eds.),Interventions for
Academic and Behavior Problems II: Preventive and Remedial Approaches (pp. 403- 432). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Hart, B. M., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of
young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Hasbrouck, J. Tindal, G. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuableassessment tool for
reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.
Individual with Disabilities Educational Act of 1997, 34 C.F.R. §300.7, 105th Congress. (1997).
Retrievedfrom
Individual with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §1400, 108th
Congress. (2004). Retrievedfrom
Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy
skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
Lyon, G., Fletcher, J.,Shaywitz,S., Shaywitz, B.,Torgesen, J., Wood, F., Schulte, A., & Olson,
R.(2001). Rethinking Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from
National Center for Educational Statistics.(2004). Part 2: Learner Outcomes. Retrieved from
National Commission of Excellence in Education (1983) A Nation At Risk: The Imperative For Educational Reform. Retrieved from
Peterson, K. M. H., & Shinn, M. R. (2002). Severe discrepancy models: Which best explains
school identification practices for learning disabilities? School Psychology Review, 31,
459-476.
Reschly, D. J., & Hosp, J. L. (2004). State SLD policies and practices. Learning Disability
Quarterly, 27, 197-213.
Reschly, D. J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In A.
Thomas & J. Grimes (eds.) Best Practices in School Psychology, 4th ed. (pp. 3-21).
Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Reynolds, C., Lowe, P., & Saenz, A. (1999). The problem of bias in psychological assessment.
In C. R. Reynolds & T. Gutkin (Eds.), The Handbook of School Psychology (3rd ed.,
pp.540-505). New York, NY: Wiley.
Tilly, D.(2002). Best practices in school psychology as a problem-solving enterprise. In A
Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology IV (Vol. 1, pp. 21–36).
Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
United States Department of Education. (2006). Secretary Spellings announces final Limited
English Proficiency regulations. Retrieved from
Vaughn Gross Center for Reading Difficulties.(2005). Instructional decision-making
procedures for insuring appropriate instruction for struggling students in grades K-3.
Retrieved from
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of
identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–
409.
Financial Support for Project IDEAL is provided by the Texas Council for Developmental Disabilities, with Federal funds* made available by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Developmental Disabilities. *$599,247 (74%) DD funds; $218,725 (26%) non-federal resources
The views contained herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the funding agency[s]. No official endorsement should be inferred.
Page 1 of 5