THE READ ME FILE
Please read entirely though this ‘READ ME’ file and the attached ‘FREQUENTLY ASK QUESTIONS’ doc. These documents will answer most all of the questions you may have. If after reading though the ‘READ ME’ and the ‘FREQUENTLY ASK QUESTIONS’ and you find that your questions were not answered then, please email me with your questions at: . I am happy to answer your questions.
FOREWORD:
I know reading all of this stuff can get quite boring. I am not the most skillful writer on the planet by far but, I will do my best not to put you to sleep.
Helping people to get their traffic tickets dismissed in traffic court is just part of my self-anointed mission, the other half of this mission is my desire to help enlighten people to the fraud being committed by our courts, our politicians and those who behind the scenes, who control our lives and force us to become their slaves.
I have found that the traffic ticket fraud, the fraud of the so-called traffic laws and the fraud of the traffic courts, to be a good teaching instrument to help teach people how to see or to recognize the countless frauds and tyrannies being perpetrated upon them by their corrupt government. Once people are able to see and understand the fraud and corruption on this basic level, they become far more able to see or to recognize other frauds and tyrannies being perpetrated upon them by our evil state.
It matters not if you vote for the DemoRATS or the Republican Neo Cons. Both political parties are out to take away yours and my freedoms and liberties so that, their demonic devil worshipping masters, who are bent on world domination to totally rule our lives and totally enslave us. The ones I of whom I speak, are a select few of the world’s super rich elitists in control of a shadow government that runs or controls our government, and a great many of the leading governments on the planet.
We are just a bunch well kept slaves for now but, don’t count on that being the status quo for much longer. The super rich elitists in control are quickly ratcheting up their plans for total and absolute world domination. Although Satanists, this small group of super rich satanic elitists do believe in the biblical prophecy of a one world religion and a one world government with them being in control. What they don’t believe however, is that they will be quickly defeated.
A good many of you, I know, are well aware of the vile corrupting forces controlling our country, inflicting tyranny and misery upon our lives and enslaving us, and many of you are hearing this for the first time. Others of you come from various backgrounds of knowledge and understanding of these things. I give thanks to my Creator for this opportunity to share with you some of what I have learned and I pray it may serve useful to you in your quest for truth, understanding and freedom.
Credit where credit is due: Everyone learns most of what they know from others. I learned most of what I know about the common law traffic ticket default from my mentor, the late Clyde Hyde. Clyde learned about the common law default technique from a retired judge and college professor and then constructed the common law traffic ticket default from what he had learned.
Recently, I made some significant changes to my documents and my default method based upon some powerful new legal information provided to me by an amazingly tenacious legal activist and scholarly couple, Jack and Margy Flynn. The Flynns have been kicking some bodacious corrupt judicial butt in the state of New Mexico using some great legal research of their own and the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Last, but not least, my friend and new legal business partner, Steve Laubly. Steve did much of the work of putting together the new legal docs.
By,Greg Slaughter
SUCCESS RATE OF THE COMMON LAW DEFAULT:
To my knowledge no traffic ticket defense method has been more successful in getting traffic tickets dismissed in traffic court than mine has. Many traffic ticket defense programs will claim high success rates but, you will find most all of them count as a part of their success rate reductions of fine money or having some of the charges reduced or dropped. I only count complete a dismissal of all charges and nothing else. Dismissal your case is the only true victory.
I made my common law traffic ticket default program available to the public on the internet on November 9, 2004. My default program has been used by over 1,500 people across the nation now with about a eighty percent overall success rate. The common law default has been much more successful in some states than others. In California for instance, the success rate is well above 90 percent. Generally, the common law traffic default has been about ten to fifteen percent more successful West of the Mississippi verses East of the Mississippi. Why? Perhaps the courts West of the Mississippi are a bit more inclined to protect the fraud? Your guess is as good as mine here.
Please keep this in mind, I can not guarantee that your traffic ticket will get dismissed. I sincerely wish that everyone who uses my common law traffic default method would get their traffic ticket dismissed but, nothing is one hundred percent when you are dealing with people, and especially when dealing with people who earn their living from perpetuating a corrupt system.
THE DOCUMENTS:
The Ticket Slayer Common Law Traffic Default is comprised of three documents:
- DECLARATION OF DEFENDANT’S STANDING
- AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
- ACCEPTANCE OF OATH OF OFFICE
OTHER DOCUMENTS INCLUDED WITH THE DEFAULT DOCS PACKAGE:
- ‘READ ME’ file
- FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
If you have not received one or more of the above documents, please email me at and tell me which document(s) you are missing.
OVERVIEW OF THE COMMON LAW DEFAULT AND ITS APPLICATION:
The Declaration of Defendant’s Standing and the Affidavit of Truth are used in conjunction with one another to place the prosecutor into legal default. Declaration of Defendant’s Standing legally declares who you are, and who you are not, and declares that you have no contract with the state, county or city, that you are not member of the body politic or corporate and that you have not joined the suit brought by the state against you ‘legal fiction’ – YOUR NAME in ALL CAPS.
In both aforementioned legal documents, the prosecutor is noticed of his legal duty to rebut your claims and that by if he fails to do in the legally prescribed time limit (normally 10 calendar days), he is in default.
The prosecutor will default. Now, after having had my common law default used in well over one thousand traffic cases, there have been only two prosecutors that I am aware of who, have ever attempted to refute anything in these legal documents. Even then, neither prosecutor provided a specific legal point by point rebuttal of the defendant’s claims but rather, they just expressed their opinion that the documents were not valid and/or frivolous. Such does not qualify in law as a legal rebuttal.
There is very little question of the prosecutor’s default, and when he or she defaults by not legally rebutting your claims, the law says that,- the prosecutor must thereafter accept your claims as being the truth. The prosecutor’s claims against you are legally voided upon his default. If we were dealing with an honest court system then, that would be the end of things. The prosecutor would simply notify you and the court that, he must drop the charges against you and clear the record. Unfortunately, the court system is not so honorable and you will have to appear in court to force the judge to dismiss your case based on the default.
The judge knows that he was placed on the bench to collect money for the state, county or city by upholding and perpetuating the traffic fraud. If the judge were to admit that he was dismissing your case because, the prosecutor could not rebut your legal claims that you are not subject to the traffic code, and that the court has no jurisdiction over you then, he would be admitting to his active participation in the state’s fraud and extortion racket. For this reason don’t expect the judge to sit there and say that he or she is dismissing your case based upon the prosecutor’s default.
A Judge’s preferred method to dismiss a case where there is a default of the prosecutor using my common law default method, is to just inform the officer his testimony is not needed in court concerning this case. If the cop can not come to court to testify against you then, the judge must dismiss. Clean and simple… no mess, no fuss! This is what happens about eighty to eighty five percent of the time on average across the nation with people using my common law default.
Before I move on, I want to let you know that the courts adapt to challenges. If you were to use information on how to get your traffic case dismissed in traffic court printed or created five year years ago, or even two years ago, the judges have already been informed how to counter them. Judges have there own grapevine, newsletters, associations, government information legal sources, and blue ribbon think tanks to counter our attacks. The best they have been able to do on the common law default so far is to call it frivolous or legal nonsense. Judges and prosecutors would like you to believe this. They mainly call it this in court to impress the peanut gallery, and then find some excuse to dismiss the case.
The default documents you received are new as of 11/13/06. New material has been added and the old information has been modified and redrafted. With the addition of the Acceptance of Constitutions and Oath of Office the default is going to be very troublesome for the courts to deny.
HOW SHOULD I ADDRESS THE JUDGE IN COURT:
I wish to state as a matter of record that, I am personally appalled by fact that judges expect us sovereigns to address them as ‘your Honor,’ for they clearly have no honor. Our Constitution forbids titles of nobility in this country. Perhaps someone should tell the state of Rhode Island that they should read the Constitution because, Rhode Island has a law that requires people to refer to the judge as ‘your Honor.’
I am also appalled by the idea that we sovereigns are expected to stand as the judge enters the courtroom, as if the judge is some kind of demigod we must, or had better show reverence for. You should know that, the practice of people standing for the judge as he entered the room, began in the early days of our country when the judge would enter the courtroom with the Holy Bible held high above his head, and the people stood up in respect to God’s word and not the man holding the bible above his head. Standing for the judge is the same as bowing before him. Sovereign people have no duty to bow before, or to show special reverence before any man or woman.
I refer to the judge in my written example below as ‘your Honor.’ I address the judge in this manner here because, it is the accepted and expected salutation when addressing a judge in our society. You are free of course, to address the judge however you feel you should. I personally use ‘sir’ or ‘madam’ to address a judge in court. This method of addressing a judge is not likely to offend the vast majority of judges and at least in the beginning of things, it is best not to be seen as being confrontational by the judge. As the old saying goes, “it easier to attract more flies with honey than it is with vinegar.” If you do not wish to address the judge as ‘your Honor’ then, I recommend just addressing him or her as, sir or madam.
THE STRATEGY TO FORCE THE JUDGE TO DISMISS YOUR CASE:
Time to play some football.
A friend of mine who has successfully used my common law traffic default several times now, likens my default process to a game of football. My friend said, the default documents will carry the ball down the field all of the way to a touchdown (dismissal) about eighty percent of the time. About twenty percent of the time however, you get stopped just short of your goal on your own 10 yard line. Getting to the ten yard line was pretty easy to do because, the default did all of the work carrying the dismissal ball up to this point. Getting the last ten yards to the goal line is now dependant upon your own personal determination and abilities and just how bad you desire a taste of victory, my friend says to me.
Every good football team has a good coach. I pray that I am that good coach. My job as coach is to coach you on how to carry the default ball the last ten yards to your goal of dismissal. I like to think that my coaching skills are pretty good, and despite the fact that the other team is known to play dirty ball, I still believe we will win. I believe in our game plan and strategies and I believe in the abilities of every one of my players!
Here is an example of when you have been stopped on your own ten yard line: The judge fails to read your documents before time of your trial.
Unless the judge has read your documents, he will not know how you placed the prosecutor into default, and you most likely will not know that the judge has not read your documents, unless you ask him.
Stopped on your own 10 yard line… the knucklehead judge fails to read your documents before time of your trial.
When you are called to come forward to defend yourself in a traffic trial, and the judge does not immediately say that he is dismissing your case, don’t allow him to proceed any further. Ask him immediately if he has received and has read your legal documents you served upon the prosecutor and filed with the court? If he says, no I have not received them, have an extra copy of each of the stamped docs with you, and ask the judge’s permission to hand them to the bailiff so that he can present them to the judge. (Remember the judge is a god, and you are not allowed to directly hand him anything, or come near him while he sits upon his thrown.)
If the judge says; yes, I have received your documents but, I have not read them, ask the judge to please take as much time as necessary now to read them, as they are very crucial to your case. Follow this request right up with this statement; “In the interest of justice, I move this court to dismiss my case based upon the legal facts and arguments presented in my documents.”
Stating; “In the interest of justice, I…..” in advance of the judge reading your documents, provides the judge with a legal escape mechanism he can use to dismiss your case without admitting to why he is dismissing your case. If you don’t present the motion to dismiss as stated above in advance of him reading your documents then, the judge is caught in a situation where he feels that he must deny you the default, otherwise it would be an admission of fraud.
“Rest assured that, - ‘justice’ is the least of most judges’ goals and pursuits.” They only allow us to win with the default because, they fear that you might just be the guy or gal who is able and determined enough to take them to task and remove them from the bench.
DEFAULT = NO MATTER OF CONTROVERSY = DISMISSAL
When there is a prosecutor in court:
KEEP THIS IN MIND: Courts can only hear matters in controversy. When the prosecutor defaults, there ceases to exist any matter of controversy between the parties (you and the state.) Thus, no controversy, no matter for the court to decide. The court has no jurisdiction over any party who is not apart of a controversy before the court. No controversy - no jurisdiction. It’s that simple.
Move for dismissal: I move this court to dismiss based upon the lack of controversy in this case, pursuant to the default of the prosecutor. It is primarily up to you to get your case dismissed in court. If you don’t ask the judge to dismiss your case then, it is very unlikely that the judge will just volunteer dismiss it, especially with a prosecutor present.
If you have a prosecutor in court, it is the prosecutor’s job to object to your motion. If the prosecutor just makes some statement about your common law default being just a bunch of gibberish, nonsense or is frivolous, inform him and the court that the burden of proof is upon the state and that the prosecutor mustprove his claim byfacts supported in law.