Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
November 2013 / 2

Presented by Dr Ashley Tsacalos, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright

Tuesday 26 November 2013, 10:45am – 11:45am

This session will examine the liability and administrative law issues associated with government decisions to end a government scheme/program or effect a key policy change that has both financial and non-financial consequences for individuals and the private sector generally. It will also include a discussion of risk management strategies and practices associated with the conceptualisation and implementation of government schemes and programs. A number of case studies will be referred to and discussion about the various lessons learnt.

Summary

According to the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO):

“Implementation and delivery of Australian Government policy initiatives is one of the key responsibilities of government agencies. In recent years there has been an increasing focus on and a community expectation of, sound policy implementation and seamless delivery of government policies — on time, within budget and to an acceptable level of quality”.[1]

The ANAO’s Better Practice Guide for the “Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives: Making implementation matter”, considers the importance of adequate attention, during policy development, to implementation risks and practicalities. It then proceeds to addresses other key considerations as the initiative develops from the initial policy concept including . governance; risk management; implementation planning; procurement and contract management; stakeholder management; resources; communication; and monitoring and review.

This provides a useful framework in terms of the conceptualisation and implementation of a policy or program for the purposes of considering the specific question of: how to plan for the possible cancellation of the policy or program? This issue needs to be considered specifically in this phase as it determines the types of issues that may arise upon cancellation and the mechanisms or protections that may be available to assist in the event that cancellation eventuates. However, there will be issues that arise upon cancellation that could not have been foreseen or anticipated as well as those issues that are an inevitable result of cancellation that will need to be addressed.

In light of this, this seminar is divided into two parts:

1.  Policy design and implementation – issues to address in preparation for possible cancellation

2.  Policy cancellation – issues that arise upon cancellation.

The issues discussed will be addressed by reference to appropriate examples and case studies.

1.  Policy design and implementation – issues to address in preparation for possible cancellation

a)  Risk management, including an exit strategy (as part of contingency planning)

b)  Specific risk allocation clauses:

i.  insurance and insurance-related clauses

ii.  indemnity clauses

iii.  limitation of liability clauses

c)  Other relevant contractual clauses:

i.  liquidated damages clauses

ii.  fitness for purpose clauses

iii.  termination for convenience clauses

iv.  dispute resolution clauses

v.  “reasonable cooperation and assistance” provisions

d)  Administrative law issues

i.  merits review

ii.  judicial review

e)  Compliance and enforcement

i.  information gathering powers

ii.  civil penalty regime

iii.  criminal sanctions

2.  Policy cancellation – issues that arise upon cancellation.

a)  Liability

i.  negligence

ii.  misfeasance in public office

iii.  other actions

b)  Dealing with claims, disputes and litigation:

i.  alternative dispute resolution mechanisms

ii.  compensation schemes – including the CDDA Scheme and Act of Grace Payments

iii.  model litigant obligations

iv.  document management

c)  Other issues

i.  FOI and other compulsory production processes

ii.  administrative law issues

iii.  employment issues and OHS prosecutions (Comcare or State WorkCover agencies

iv.  parliamentary reviews, inquiries and third party reviews

v.  royal commissions, commissions of inquiry and judicial inquiries (and coronial inquiries)

Presenter:

Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
November 2013 / 2

Dr Ashley Tsacalos

Partner
Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
Level 18, Grosvenor Place, 225 George Street, Sydney

Level 6, 60 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra
Tel +61 2 9330 8151 | Mob +61 402 31 32 33 | Fax +61 2 9330 8111

Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
November 2013 / 2

Norton Rose Fulbright

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide the world’s pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (‘the Norton Rose Fulbright members’) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.

Law around the world
nortonrosefulbright.com

University of Western Sydney
Credentials / Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
September 2013 / 5


Disclaimer

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.

References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this presentation. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.

The purpose of this presentation is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law discussed.

You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.

[1] Australian National Audit Office, “Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives: Making implementation matter”, Better Practice Guide, October 2006, p.1.