Superior Court Penalties
Regions and Judges of Ontario
Northeastern Ontario Judicial Region Summary
Peter Karl Roscoe
Nov 2008
North East Region Penalties and Cost Penalties Summary
Contents
1 Sex of judge M – Male F - Female
2 Region Nw – North East Region
# p – number of penalties # sr – number of penalties to self represented litigants
Penalties Against Men / Penalties Against WomenTotal / Major / Total / Major
Judge / 1 / 2 / # p / # sr / # p / # sr / # p / # sr / # p / # sr
Gauthier / F / Ne / 13 / 4 / 6 / 1 / 5 / 0 / 2 / 0
Hennessy / F / Ne / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Pardu / F / Ne / 7 / 4 / 6 / 4 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Boissonneault / M / Ne / 1 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Del Frate / M / Ne / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 1
Karam / M / Ne / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Loukidelis / M / Ne / 6 / 2 / 5 / 2 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 0
O’Neill / M / Ne / 15 / 2 / 11 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Riopelle / M / Ne / 7 / 6 / 4 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Rivard / M / Ne / 6 / 4 / 3 / 3 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0
Whalen / M / Ne / 7 / 3 / 5 / 1 / 3 / 0 / 2 / 0
Female Judges / 3 / 22 / 8 / 13 / 5 / 5 / 0 / 2 / 0
Male judges / 8 / 44 / 19 / 30 / 11 / 11 / 1 / 4 / 1
Total / 11 / 66 / 27 / 43 / 16 / 16 / 1 / 6 / 1
Northeast Region Financial Data ( in 1000 $’s )
Male Lump Sums missing 0
N = 7 Mean = 354.2 Total = 2479.4
1.400 7.000 7.300 9.000 25.00 30.00 2400
Male Imputed Income missing 2
N = 13 Mean = 31.4 Total = 174.2
6.200 8.000 10.00 12.00 15.00 16.00 17.40 29.00 35.00 35.00 50.00 60.00 115.0
Male Cost Penalties
N = 15 Mean = 31.7 Total = 475.5
0.8000 1.000 1.300 1.500 1.500 3.500 3.500 3.500 8.000 9.300 10.00 15.00 18.00 28.00 370.0
Female Cost Penalties
N = 5 Mean = 50.3 Total = 251.5
2.500 3.000 7.500 27.50 211.0
Northeast Region Case Summary
1) Penalties Against Men
Contents
1 Sex of Judge M – male F - female
2 Region Ce – central east Cs – central south Cw – central east
E – eastern Ne – north east Nw – north west
Sw – south west T - Toronto
3 Sex of Mans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
4 Sex of Womans Lawyer M – male F – female L – lawyer sr – self represented ex – ex parte
5 Major or Minor Penalty mj – major mn - minor
6 Type of Penalty C – contempt Cts – costs D – default
Ep – exclusive possession of the family home F – freezing assets
Js – summary judgment Ip – imputed income L – lump sum
Pr – prejudgment interest Ro - restraining order Sa - supervised access
Sc – security St – striking pleadings
7 Amount of impution of yearly income, or total cost penalty, or lump sum ( in 1000 $’s )
Judge / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / Case / 5 / 6 / 7 / DescriptionGauthier / F / Ne / sr / m / Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 8.0 / 8 K costs for July 2001 motion to vary support of 2.6 K per month and wifes denied motion to strike pleadings
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / F / B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / 10.0 / Mans income is imputed an extra 10 K, wifes income imputed 40 K, offset child support , man must pay 1.5 K spousal support
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / F / Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Man violates freezing order, house and half pension vested to wife
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / F / Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.) / mj / Pr / Wife gets 14 K prejudgment interest
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / F / Bielanski v. Bielanski, 2005 CanLII 18719 (ON S.C.) / mn / Sc / Must designate wife as beneficiary of life insurance and provide health insurance, 2.2 K per month total support
Gauthier / F / Ne / L / L / Blake v. Blake, 2000 CanLII 22528 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Minutes of settlement set aside because man defaults on providing financial information, provincial court order overturned and 13 K retroactive arrears
Gauthier / F / Ne / sr / F / Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.) / mn / F / Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house and custody
Gauthier / F / Ne / sr / M / Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 8.0 / Man claims 12 K income imputed to 20 K
Gauthier / F / Ne / sr / F / Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.) / mn / Sa / Judge imposes supervised access when man says he’s too upset for trial, removed after trial despite wifes request
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / F / Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ep / Wifes motion for exclusive possession of the family home allowed, non depletion order, spousal and child support
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / M / Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.) / mn / F / Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / M / Loiselle v. Loiselle, 2000 CanLII 22461 (ON S.C.) / mn / Sc / Man must designate his 135 K insurance policy to wife, 1.5 K per month support
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / M / McLean v. McLean, 2003 CanLII 2044 (ON SC) / mj / L / 25.0 / 20 K US lump sum from separation agreement paid, separation agreement then ruled invalid
Hennessy / F / Ne / M / F / Pestell v. Krystia, 2003 CanLII 2045 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / 12.0 / Man claims 82 K income and is imputed to 90 K, retroactive arrears, leave to appeal denied
Hennessy / F / Ne / M / F / Young v. Young, 2003 CanLII 47887 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Man gets 3 years for assault, his access and grandparents access denied
Pardu / F / Ne / L / L / Booth v. Booth, 2002 CanLII 49529 (ON S.C.) / mn / L / 1.4 / 1.4 K lump sum for retroactive arrears, child formerly declared adult has support reinstated
Pardu / F / Ne / sr / M / Goudie v. Stapleford, 2004 CanLII 20297 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Spousal support obligation secured against property, separation agreement not to pay support overturned
Pardu / F / Ne / sr / M / Léveillé v. Lemieux, 2002 CanLII 2694 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 60.0 / $ 507 per month child support and $ 123 per month s.7 expenses and 2 1 K airfares per year, man quits job as a teacher and starts a convenience store, claims a 6 K loss and is imputed to 60 K per year, wife earns 44.3 K
Pardu / F / Ne / sr / sr / Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 17.4 / Man claims 12.6 K income and is imputed to 30 K, intentionally unemployed, arrears not rescinded
Pardu / F / Ne / sr / sr / Shelly v. Shelly, 2004 CanLII 5083 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Property charged for default on child support, no recission of arrears, bad faith , imputed income, intentionally unermployed
Pardu / F / Ne / F / M / Walker v. Rutledge, 2003 CanLII 2358 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 18.0 / Divorce action, 18 K costs
Pardu / F / Ne / M / M / Wamsley v. Moore, 2003 CanLII 2269 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Pleadings to be struck unless he pays 25.6 K to FRO immediately, contempt motion abandoned
Boissonneault / M / Ne / ex / F / Masotti v. Masotti, 2002 CanLII 2800 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Unopposed support motion because husband is in default
Del Frate / M / Ne / ex / F / O'Neill v. O'Neill, 2004 CanLII 8369 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / Mans income imputed to 68 K, retroactive arrears
Karam / M / Ne / l / F / Scalabrini v. Scalabrini, 2003 CanLII 18778 (ON S.C. / mj / L / 7.0 / 7 K lump sum to settle spousal support, does not invalidate further claims
Loukidalis / M / Ne / sr / F / Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Mans stock account and motorcycle transferred to wife to be sold for arrears, 4.2 K per month total support, imputed income
Loukidalis / M / Ne / sr / F / Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 115.0 / Mans stated income 35 K imputed at 150 K, wife, 4.2 K per month total support, arrears, wife imputed to 15 K per year, wife minor
Loukidelis / M / Ne / M / M / Bevacqua v. Bevacqua, 2003 CanLII 1936 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 10.0 / 10 K costs and GST
Loukidelis / M / Ne / M / M / Bevacqua v. Bevacqua, 2003 CanLII 1936 (ON S.C.) / mn / Pr / Prejudgment interest on 15 K equalization payment
Loukidelis / M / Ne / M / F / Bowman v. Cheluk, 2003 CanLII 1938 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / Unemployed man imputed to 35 K per year income, 2.8 K per month total support
Loukidelis / M / Ne / M / M / Dwyer v. Dwyer, 2005 CanLII 5852 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 9.3 / 9.3 K costs
O’Neill / M / Ne / F / M / Agresti v. Hatcher, 2004 CanLII 8311 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 28.0 / 28 K to pay ex wifes pretrial costs
O’Neill / M / Ne / sr / m / Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ep / Wife gets exclusive possession of home Sept 2001
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / F / Borden v. Racicot, 2003 CanLII 2065 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.3 / Interim motion, 1.3 K costs
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / M / Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 3.5 / 3.5 K costs
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / M / Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Jail threatened, security deposit, unemployed imputed income, denied access to children, costs
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / M / Charlton v. Ferguson, 2004 CanLII 10401 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 35.0 / Man is unemployed and imputed to 35 K per year
O’Neill / M / Ne / F / M / Cherry v. Cherry, 2004 CanLII 1649 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 16.0 / Man on disability for 2.5 K per year imputed to 18.5 K, 32 K support arrears reduced to 21
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / M / Guido v. Guido, 2004 CanLII 15033 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ep / Wife gets exclusive interim possession, husband must pay $ 850 child support and $ 866 spousal support
O’Neill / M / Ne / L / L / Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2129 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 6.2 / Man claims 21.7 K income and is imputed to 27.9 K
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / F / Hart v. Hart, 2003 CanLII 2130 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 3.5 / Trial of support, wife claims 43 K gets 3.5 K, husband also claims over 40 K
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / M / McIsaac v. McIsaac, 2004 CanLII 5061 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 30.0 / Lump sum spousal support of 30 K, equalization of 255 K, charging order for balance of 187 K on business
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / M / McIsaac v. McIsaac, 2004 CanLII 5061 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Lump sum spousal support of 30 K, equalization of 255 K, charging order for balance of 187 K on business
O’Neill / M / Ne / sr / M / Rose v. Rose, 2004 CanLII 17755 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 3.5 / Application to vary custody and support dismissed, 3.5 K costs
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / M / Scott v. Scott, 2003 CanLII 2234 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 35.0 / Man is unemployed and imputed to 35 K , joint custody, $ 361 per month offset child support
O’Neill / M / Ne / F / M / Sovereign v. Sovereign, 2004 CanLII 5087 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ro / Wife alleges assault and moves to shelter violating court order, wife gets custody
Riopelle / M / Ne / sr / m / Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.5 / Apr 2000 motion setting support at 2.6 K per month, 1.5 K costs
Riopelle / M / Ne / sr / m / Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ro / Previous non harassment order changed to 1500 feet from residence
Riopelle / M / Ne / sr / F / Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 15.0 / a lien on his motorcycle transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, , 15 K costs
Riopelle / M / Ne / sr / F / Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 15.0 / Leave from work constitutes underemployment, 15 K added to years income, 7 K lump spousal support
Riopelle / M / Ne / sr / M / Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 7.3 / 7.3 K lump sum for arrears of spousal support, transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, a lien on his motorcycle, 15 K costs
Riopelle / M / Ne / sr / F / Beaudry v. Beaudry, 2004 CanLII 20399 (ON S.C.) / mn / Sc / a lien on his motorcycle transfer of 30 K of RRSP for arrears and lump sum, , 15 K costs
Riopelle / M / Ne / M / F / Chertow v. Chertow, 2001 CanLII 4238 (ON C.A.) / mj / Js / Summary judgment of settlement agreement, upheld on appeal
Rivard / M / Ne / M / M / Attow v. Bang, 2006 CanLII 6695 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.5 / Low court award of 10 K costs overturned and 1.5 K costs instead
Rivard / M / Ne / M / M / Emamghorashi v. Nateghi, 2003 CanLII 2306 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 0.8 / 0.8 K costs of interim motion, ex parte default with 12.5 K cost penalty and 4 K security for costs eventually set aside
Rivard / M / Ne / sr / M / Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 370.0 / 80 K in unpaid costs, 370 K cost penalty
Rivard / M / Ne / sr / M / Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.) / mj / D / Mans pleadings struck, mans transfer of assets ruled a fraudulent conveyance and transferred to wife, 80 K repayment of funds taken, 40 K damages for fraud and 25 K punitive damages
Rivard / M / Ne / sr / F / Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 2400.0 / Lump sum 2.4 million, man declares bankruptcy, 95 K support arrears and 65 K damage deposit survives bankruptcy, previous 10 K lump sum
Rivard / M / Ne / sr / M / Mgrdichian v. Mgrdichian, 2006 CanLII 13773 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ro / 80 K in unpaid costs, 370 K cost penalty
Whalen / M / Ne / sr / M / Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 1.0 / Non harassment order subject to review made in Apr 2000, 1 K costs
Whalen / M / Ne / sr / M / Aube v. Aube, 2008 CanLII 43572 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ro / Non harassment order subject to review made in Apr 2000, 1 K costs
Whalen / M / Ne / M / M / Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 50.0 / Man unemployed imputed to 50 K per year. Wife unemployed imputed to 20 K, heard June 2006
Whalen / M / Ne / M / M / Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.) / mj / Sc / Lien on property to secure support and eqalization, heard June 2006
Whalen / M / Ne / L / L / Dorthee v. Bekintis, 2004 CanLII 44989 (ON S.C.) / mj / L / 9.0 / 9 K lump sum for settlement of spousal support obligations, and 1 year $ 750 per month
Whalen / M / Ne / M / F / Principe v. Principe, 2000 CanLII 22439 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ep / Wifes 5 year exclusive possession of the home continued, sheriffs sale stayed
Whalen / M / Ne / sr / L / Shaw-McInnis v. Crawford, 2003 CanLII 2241 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 29.0 / Mans declared income of 14 K imputed to 43 K and no relief for 2 years on welfare
2) Penalties Against Women
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / F / B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.) / mj / C / 5 K to be paid to husband for chilrens RRSP’s, 5 K to be paid to court as security, second time woman has been found in contemptGauthier / F / Ne / M / F / B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 40.0 / Wife is unemployed and imputed to 40 K per year, offset child support, man must pay 1.5 K per month spousal support
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / F / B.K. v. A.P., 2006 CanLII 19039 (ON S.C.) / mn / Sc / 5 K to be paid to husband for childrens RRSP’s, 5 K to be paid to court as security
Gauthier / F / Ne / sr / F / Harris v. Harris, 2006 CanLII 9141 (ON S.C.) / mn / F / Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Gauthier / F / Ne / M / M / Holmes v. Holmes, 2005 CanLII 20809 (ON S.C.) / mn / F / Mutual, man to pay wife support, wife gets house
Del Frate / M / Ne / M / M / Ansara v. Ansara, 2007 CanLII 6235 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 3.0 / Interim motion on acces and support, 3 K costs deferred to trial
Del Frate / M / Ne / F / sr / Levesque v. Little, 2007 CanLII 1910 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 27.5 / Divorce action, husband asks 53.2 K and gets 27.5 K
Karam / M / Ne / M / M / Gabel v. Gabel, 2003 CanLII 48307 (ON C.A.) / mn / St / Wife in default’s pleadings closed, order set aside on appeal, wife gets 12 K costs
Loukidalis / M / Ne / sr / F / Raphael v. Raphael, 2003 CanLII 2215 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / 15.0 / Mans stated income 35 K imputed at 150 K, wife, 4.2 K per month total support, wife imputed to 15 K per year, wife minor
Loukidelis / M / Ne / M / M / Borsos v. Borsos, 2006 CanLII 31201 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 7.5 / Divorce action, husband asks 47.1 K and gets 7.5 K
O’Neill / M / Ne / M / M / Scott v. Scott, 2003 CanLII 2234 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / 36.0 / Woman imputed at full income of 36 K after quitting her job for 6 months, then at half income for 6 months, then back to full as incentive, reduces support she’s owed to $360 per month, minor
Riopelle / M / Ne / M / F / Chertow v. Chertow, 2005 CanLII 35478 (ON S.C.) / mn / Cts / 2.5 / 2.5 K costs of motion to vary support, recalculation leaves father 38 K arrears
Rivard / M / Ne / M / M / Attow v. Bang, 2006 CanLII 6695 (ON S.C.) / mj / Ip / 20.0 / Wife claims 15 K income and is imputed to 35 K
Whalen / M / Ne / M / M / Colquhoun v. Colquhoun, 2007 CanLII 30 (ON S.C.) / mn / Ip / 20.0 / Man unemployed imputed to 50 K per year. Wife unemployed imputed to 20 K, heard June 2006
Whalen / M / Ne / M / M / Feng v. Philips, 2006 CanLII 13769 (ON S.C.) / mj / Cts / 211.0 / Divorce action, 5 ½ years to get to trial, 211 K costs
Whalen / M / Ne / M / M / Feng v. Philips, 2006 CanLII 13769 (ON S.C.) / mj / Pr / 48 K in prejudgment interest on condo rents, spousal support claim denied