Journal on Education in Emergencies

Manuscript Title Page Template

Please fill in this title page. Be ready to upload this Title Page as you are preparing your submission through the Journal Editorial Manager software.

  1. Title of Paper:
  2. Names, affiliations and emails of Author(s):
  3. Word count without references:
  4. Word count with references:

CHECKLIST for BLINDNESS ISSUES for ALL MANUSCRIPTS:

  1. [yes] [no] the first page of the paper has been blinded; this means that I have ensured that the first page has absolutely no references to the author(s).
  2. [yes] [no] the text of the paper has been blinded; this means that I have ensured that the text has absolutely no references to the author(s) AND their previous publications.
  3. [yes] [no] the bibliography, footnotes, endnotes and tables/graphics of the paper have been blinded; they have absolutely no references to the author(s) AND their previous publications.
  4. [yes] [no] in the cases where I need to refer to myself, my co-authors and our previous publications, I inserted the words “REFERENCE” or “AUTHOR(S)” instead of my real name or the title of my publication..
  5. [yes] [no] I will upload this Title Page as a separate file from the manuscript file.

CHECKLIST for SCOPE/METHODS/CONTENT - RESEARCH ARTICLES:

  1. [yes] [no]: the paper uses an explicit theoretical or conceptual framework;
  2. [yes] [no]: situates the research within relevant body of literature;
  3. [yes] [no]: demonstrates originality of the analysis;
  4. [yes] [no]: uses appropriate research methods (qualitative, quantitative, mixed) and theory;
  5. [yes] [no]: contributes to the advancement of knowledge and literature on EiE;
  6. [yes] [no]: demonstrates implications for broader educational problems;

CHECKLIST for SCOPE/METHODS/CONTENT FIELD NOTE ARTICLES:

  1. [yes] [no]: the paper discusses an approach, project or tool and describes its design/application/implementation
  2. [yes] [no]: the paper analyzes positive and negative impacts
  3. [yes] [no]: the paper presents lessons learned, and demonstrates critical reflections regarding the approach/project/tool
  4. [yes] [no]: the paper contributes new or innovative thinking to EiE practice and policy more broadly

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS (AUTHORS ARE STRONGLY RECOMMENDED TO CONSULT THIS LIST AND REFLECT THESE COMPONENTS IN THEIR PAPERS WHERE APPROPRIATE)

  1. [yes] [no]: if research, then institutional safeguards have been respected (IRB approval etc.)
  2. [yes] [no]: the paper discusses how the study/approach/project/tool reflects the ‘do no harm’ principle of EiE work (this should be evidenced in the discussion of project / research design, implementation and analysis)
  3. [yes] [no]: the paper makes reference to project or research impact and discusses implications and connections to well-being
  4. [yes] [no]: appropriate informed consent has been sought for voluntary participation in the study (and is referenced in the paper)
  5. [yes] [no]: confidentiality of participants has been upheld in the text submitted. If confidentiality has not been upheld, then the reasons for this are discussed

Thank you for your interest in the Journal on Education in Emergencies. We are committed to reviewing your submissions in a timely manner. For any questions, please email .