Indonesian Extension 2009
Work program review checklist — RevisedMarch 2015

The information you provide on this form will be used for reviewing work programs for quality assurance purposes as part of legislative functions described in theEducation (Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority) Act 2014 (s.14). Personal information will be accessed by authorised QCAA staff, including panel staff, and handled in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 2009.

Panel code: / B06 / Subject code: / 004
School:
School code: / District:
Reviewer name: / Date:
Compiled by the Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority

This form is used by panellists when reviewing work programs. It can also be useful for schools to use as a checklist to ensure that all work program requirements have been met.

Instructions: Indicate Yes or No to the following statements. If your answer is No, please give specific examples of the problem in the Comments section.

Course organisation

The course organisation shows: / Yes / No / Comments
  • a minimum of two themes

  • the topics to be studied in each theme

  • an in-depth study of six weeks or more for each chosen theme

  • the approximate number of weeks allocated to each unit

  • some study of literature or history within a theme or unit.

Outline of intended student learning

The scope and depth of the student learning experiences are demonstrated in: / Yes / No / Comments
  • one sample unit of work, showing:

opportunities to develop the general objectives
use of communicative language in realistic activities and settings
promotion and development of spontaneous language use
use of a range of spoken, written and visual text types
the balance across the four macroskills
studies in the theme area being related to current issues.

Assessment plan

The assessment plan may be recorded as part of a student profile.

The assessment planindicates: / Yes / No / Comments
  • that monitoring and verification folio requirements are met:

one response/performance per macroskill per semester
assessment in a minimum of two themes
  • suggested assessment instruments, including theme, technique, timing and a range of tasks and text types

  • two responses/performances in each macroskill including:

one extended piece of writing of approximately 300 words
one spontaneous written response with no preparation
speaking responses that all require spontaneous language in a realistic context.

Additional comments

Recommendation for approval

Approved / Not approved
Action to be taken:
Indonesian Extension 2009
Work program review checklist — Revised / Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority
March 2015
Page1of 2