Improving mathematical language as a tool to develop children's mathematical understanding
Lyn Wickham
2007-2008
Who am I?
I am currently working with a Year 6 class in a Junior School in Havant. I coordinate maths across the school, and am a Leading Maths Teacher for Hampshire. I am also working towards an MA in Mathematics Education at Chichester University. As an LMT I have spent time researching Problem Solving in Junior Schools and this has lead to my current research for my dissertation on talk and vocabulary in the mathematics classroom.
Why have I chosen this area to research?
For my masters I have spent time researching problem solving in junior schools. I introduced this to my school over the last year (we were previously very much chalk and talk as a school, and to an extent still are) but I noticed that in my school the children were poor at working in groups to solve problems. I believe this could be because they have limited mathematical vocabulary, and are not experienced in talking about maths. This year I am looking to undertake research this issue, by finding how mathematical vocabulary effects mathematical understanding, and by looking at ways to improve maths vocabulary and mathematical talk.
Activities I might use with my class as part of my action research:
· Mathematical concept cartoons;
· The “Talk it, solve it!” resource from Beam;
· Displaying key vocabulary for each unit of work/lesson;
· Lots of group work lessons e.g. jigsaws, sorting and ordering cards etc;
· Singing maths songs;
· Getting the children to write own limericks/maths raps and their own problems
· Other activities
What am I hoping to find?
By the end of my research I’m hoping to find evidence to support some of these thoughts:
· Whether good knowledge of mathematical vocabulary helps improve mathematical problem solving;
· Is mathematical vocabulary important or not in the KS2 curriculum;
· Successful ways to improve mathematical talk and vocabulary in KS2 classroom;
· The impact of improved mathematical talk on problem solving;
· Any other issues that arise.
Methodology – Action Research
I have chosen to use action research as my main method of research for my project because it is a good for “ ’hands-on’ small scale research” (Denscombe, 1998, p57)
Denscombe, when describing action research, states, “research should not only be used to gain a better understanding of the problems that arise in everyday practise, but actually set out to alter things” (Denscombe, 1998, p57). I aim to reflect on my research and current practise and improve my teaching as a result of this project, making this type of research ideal.
Advantages:
· Positive way of addressing problems – feeds the results of the research directly back into the practise.
· Contributes to CPD of researcher
· Improvements as a result benefit the school
Disadvantages
· Limits the results – could only be valid for that workplace
· Some factors cannot be controlled as part of everyday practise
· Workplace ethics put restraints on research
· Extra work due to changes in routine when trying new concepts
· Cannot be entirely detached or objective.
Adapted from (Denscombe, 1998, p65)
Key References:
· Bullock, A (1975) A language for life, Her majesty’s stationary office: London. Found on http://www.dg.dial.pipex.com/documents/docs1/bullock.shtml
· DfES (2000) Mathematical Vocabulary, DfES
· Denscombe, M (1998) The good research guide, Open University Press: Buckingham
· Durkin, K and Shire, B (1991) Language in mathematics education: research and practise, Milton Keynes: Open University Press
· Hodgen, J (2006) Mathematics inside the black box. Nelson: London
· Pennant, J. (2005). Talk it, Solve it, reasoning skills in maths years 5 & 6. Beam Education: London
· Raiker, A (2002), Spoken Language and mathematics, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol 32, No.1, p45-60
Proposed Timescale
· Autumn Term – Literary review, plan action research, photo permission forms etc
· Spring Term – Action research
· Summer Term – Draw conclusions, write up for submission July 2008
What am I hoping to find?
By the end of my research I’m hoping to find evidence to support some of these thoughts:
· What does good quality maths talk sound like?
· What tasks generate good mathematical discussion?
· An understanding of what needs to happen for the children to get more out of the tasks.
· Have a bank of tasks and my reasons for choosing them (or not) available to share on the NCETM portal and with my colleagues.
· Any other issues that arise.
Description of work to be undertaken:
· Read research on mathematical talk and language to see what other researchers have found out so far – Why talk in maths? What types of talk are there? What type of talk would I like to see? What supports this talk? How will I know children’s talk is progressing?
· Research a range of activities that I can use with my class.
· Observe groups talking – what needs to change?
· Action research – trial ideas on my class and hopefully improve their language.
· Evaluate classroom implications/impact of activities.
· Contribute to NCETM portal and write my dissertation.