Five Series Reviewed by High School Taskforce
TOP Pros and Cons
Didache Series by Midwest Theological Forum (Semester Series only)
- SCHOOL Edition (hard cover)
- Strengths
- Well written text; gives a great synopsis of the faith
- Artwork, illustrations, charts very well done
- Great use of Scripture
- Weaknesses
- Overly doctrinal; too much content
- Only traditional and comprehensive tests & quizzes
- No interactive online study guides, no suggestions for YouTubes or video clips
b. PARISH Edition (softcover textbooks)
- Strengths
- Rich content
- Beautiful artwork
- Good use of margins to incorporate Youcat sections and questions
- Weaknesses
- More memorization than encouraging a life of faith
- Too advanced for parish level
- No catechist manual
2. St. Mary’s Press
a. SCHOOL Edition (Semester Series)
- Strengths
- Relational aspect stressed throughout the text
- Repetition of story of salvation
- Excellent teacher manual
- Weaknesses
- No enough depth
- Teacher manual confusing and disjointed
- Follows the Framework so exact that it does not flow well
- Strengths
- User friendly
- Online activities provided
- Great reflection questions
- Weaknesses
- Does not provide specific lessons on Scripture
- Not many graphics
- Does not follow the Framework in sequence
- Ave Maria Press (semester Series) General Editor is Michael Pennock
a. Strengths
- Well written, easy to read
- Online support material
- Wide variety of prayer experiences
- Weaknesses
- Too much reading
- Student text in wrap-around teacher manual much too small
- Topics in chapters disjointed
4. Credo by Veritas General Editor is Thomas Groome
- Strengths
- Excellent questions
- Very good prayer services
- Good formative activities
- Weaknesses
- Textbook choppy, shallow, lacking depth
- Confusing layout
- Lack of audio/visual suggestions
- Our Sunday Visitor
- Strengths
- Great online resources
- Variety of prayer experiences
- Beautiful and up-to-date pictures
- Weaknesses
- Print from student text too small in teacher edition
- Not enough prayer suggestions
- Lack of many higher-order thinking questions for discussion