E-Mails S-050 through S-099
S-050. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL / forwarded an email he sent to scientist Yoshinari Minami
S-051. from Bob King regarding additional testimony as to the teleportation aspect of the P-X
S-052. Bob King (follow-up to email #51)
S-053. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an experiment to create mini-black holes
S-054. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail regarding help in a new Bose-Einstein condensate
S-055. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding background courses in Riemannian geometry
S-056. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail to NASA about UNITEL's projects
S-057. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Spaceship Fiber Bundle Connection
S-058. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding bewilderment over lack of government funding
S-059. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Jack Sarfatti's skepticism
S-060. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding viewing engineering CAD drawing of the UNITEL lens
S-061. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contract award to a competitor
S-062. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding disclosing all projects to potential investors
S-063. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Sarfatti takes on Witten & Hawking
S-064. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL referencing a formal application by UNITEL
S-065. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a potential new investor company
S-066. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a debate challenge to Jack Sarfatti
S-067. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the chances of Sarfatti accepting the debate
S-068. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding how science doesn't always understand why something works
S-069. from Alexander Beletsky regarding a Soviet UFO Research Institute
S-070. from Tom Mahood regarding UNITEL
S-071. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding other people who want to debate Jack Sarfatti
S-072. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing a book about the UNITEL experience
S-073. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding obtaining a National Institute of Health grant
S-074. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding setting UNITEL's stock prices
S-075. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the UNITEL newsletter
S-076. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding P-R & promotional materials
S-077. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a Spain-based business potential partner
S-078. from Jack Sarfatti regarding Zero-Point Energy technology
S-079. from Jack Sarfatti forwarding a response to Stan Tenen to members on his e-lists
S-080. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Zero-Point Energy
S-081. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding making slow progress to success
S-082. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a recent UFO case at Malstrom AFB
S-083. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Stephen Greer and "Out of Body Experiences"
S-084. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding others "copying" macroscopic quantum tunneling
S-085. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding another configuration for the UNITEL craft
S-086. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL correcting my "mis-conclusions" about e-mail S-085
S-087. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding why electrical charges collect on an aircraft's wing
S-088. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's "capped-cone" hull design
S-089. from Jack Sarfatti (apparently regarding my support for UNITEL)
S-090. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL rebuking Jack Sarfatti
S-091. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail from UNITEL's research director Mike Miller re. "Solid Light"
S-092. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding "FiberBundles"
S-093. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding partnership with companies intending to mine the Moon
S-094. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Scientific American article on "fiberbundles"
S-095. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a post at a Yahoo! Quantum Time Travel club
S-096. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's newsletter
S-097. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding my message posted at a Yahoo! "Quantum Time Travel" club
S-098. from "Nanna Visitor" regarding an invitation to join a "Theoretical Sciences" on-line club
S-099. from Bob King regarding a correction to the Pine Gap, Australia mystery
S-050. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL / forwarded an email he sent to UNITEL consultant Yoshinari Minami
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Re: Transmission of bundle of papers in zip file
Date : Thu, 8 Nov 2001 12:54:56 -0800
> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 12:57:43
> To:
> From: Larry Maurer <>
> Subject: Re: Transmission of bundle of papers in zip file
> Dear Yoshinari:
> How are things going for you? Good I hope. Someone sent me the following information that seems very similar to your aerospace propulsion design. The following excerpts concerning "divided space" from Bob Beckwith's book "Hypotheses" reminds me much of your "fine structure" of space that you refer to in your IAF-IAA papers. Is "divided space" the same as your fine structure (or what we refer to in our design as hyperspace or 5 thru 11 dimensions of space-time)?
> "Beckwith conjectures that the premise of Teller's IX-97 test was to teleport the minesweeper to a previous point in its space-time trajectory by encapsulating the boat in a highly specialized three-phase "electromagnetic bottle". As incredible as it sounds, this would allow a ship to "blip" out of the way of a mine to safety. He proposes that the experiment's intent was to give a U.S. vessel, at the flip of a switch, the instantaneous ability to be physically removed from the universal space-time coordinate in which it detected the presence of an enemy mine. Beckwith suggests that the creation of such a separated space-time field can be done by engaging the principles of what he calls 'divided space'."
> "In his book Hypotheses, Beckwith develops a series of fascinating postulates based on some premises which I will grossly oversimplify here. [the strong nuclear force which holds an atomic nucleus together] can be broken with the application of what is called "a three-phase neutrino field" which, in turn, creates a bubble of "divided space". Beckwith explains that a related phenomenon, which occurs haphazardly in nature, is "ball lightning". Interestingly enough, such ball lightning or "Tesla balls" have figured repeatedly in UFO eyewitness accounts."
>"… he explains: "A space divided from universal space can be created by causing a small percentage of neutrinos [that permeate all matter in our universe] passing through the space to travel in a vortex rotating at a frequency in the order of 7.5 Hertz. Strong force lines at the boundaries of the space are interrupted so long as the vortex exists. This twisting field is necessary to break the field of strong force lines between all matter in universal space and to create an inner space separated from universal space."
>"If a rotating magnetic field is operated in synchronism with the Earth's 7.32 Hz fundamental resonance, objects within one such space can be moved with respect to our 'universal space' when power is applied. The divided space is then free of forces of inertia or gravity. Once the space is divided, objects within the space may levitate, teleport, or move in time. Divided inner space can pass through universal space but is dependent on the drag and surface sharpness between spaces being low enough to prevent piercing the shell of the missing strong force lines. Electromagnetic waves, including visible light and infrared heat, can pass through the boundaries of the divided spaces."
> I am just curious to hear your opinion on this divided space idea. I hope to hear from you soon.
> best wishes,
> Larry Maurer
S-051. from Bob King regarding additional testimony as to the teleportation aspect of the P-X
From : bob king <>
To : <>
Subject : Re: possible corroboration to P-X "teleportation" goal
Date : Fri, 9 Nov 2001 11:27:30 +1300
Hello Mark,
Friday, November 09, 2001, 3:49:22 AM, you wrote:
> It's been awhile since we last "talked". A lot of web hosting companies have shut down the message boards on popular P-X and Montauk sites.
The Govt. shut them down.
> I found this in Chica Bruce's book. It verifies what you contended was the main goal of the P-X -- teleportation as opposed to 'radar invisibility' -- but perhaps with a different twist. I prepared it as a MS-Word document (attached), but I'm including the simple text versions below (I recall you had some trouble opening attached documents).
Thanks for you info. I hope you don't mind but I will make a few comments …
> Peter Moon helped Preston Nichols …
Both these men have been discredited now and are only out to make money.
> A fourth guy -- Duncan Cameron --
He has also been discredited.
> A new writer/investigator -- Alexandra "Chica" Bruce --
I am not familiar with her name.
> Although I was very enthusiastic when I read my first Montauk book, I became more doubtful with each succeeding one I purchased.
Perhaps you could find an explanation then for the area being a national park with notices saying trespassers will be shot on sight!
> One investigator --Dr. Richard Boylan -- …
I am in contact with him by email and he cannot produce any supporting evidence, photos etc. to confirm anything he says.
> … did tell me "there is so much disinformation and lies about Montauk that the real truths (if any) will probably be never be known".
Agreed.
> Late in 1942 while still in his early twenties, Beckwith invented Frequency Shift Keyed transfer trip equipment which facilitated the sending of electrical power over long distances.
Tesla patented that system.
> Between WW I and WW II, the Germans had developed underwater mines that were set off by the magnetism of passing ships' hulls requiring no direct contact with the targets.
Which would still go off even if the ship was invisible!!
> Dr. Edward Teller. Teller described to him a small-scale teleportation demonstration by Nikola Tesla which he intended to duplicate using a full-scale minesweeper.
I think I told you about that experiment.
> Beckwith's testimony is a very interesting and exciting development in the unraveling of this WW II secret. Conspicuously absent from this version of the Philadelphia Experiment are the figures of John von Neumann, "Dr. Rinehart" and the USS Eldridge which are all normally associated with the legend. Beckwith is convinced that these details are part of the disinformational campaign set up by the Navy to confuse the issue and discredit accounts of what actually took place.
Who is he? And what qualifications does he claim to have?
> … had nothing whatsoever to do with radar invisibility. It was actually an elaboration of Nikola Tesla's earlier work in teleportation.
As I said!
I don't bother with reading much about this subject now as most of it is pure conjecture and -- after all this time -- the truth will probably never be able to be confirmed. Which makes the issue a pointless one to follow. I gave you the facts. Whether-or-not you believe them is your choice.
Regards,
bob mailto:
S-052. from Bob King (follow-up to email #51)
From: bob king <>
To :
Subject : Re: extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:26:08 +1300
Hello Mark,
Saturday, November 10, 2001, 1:19:37 AM, you wrote:
> I had finally gotten around to finishing Chica's book. The part about the minesweeper and "teleportation" (really not per se, mote along the lines of backward time-travel to a previous point in history) agreed pretty much with what you said in your take on the P-X. I just thought you'd be interested in the fact that someone else was coming forward with a similar story.
Yes. It's nice to know at least someone else has got onto the truth.
> Like you, I have email exchanges with Boylan, Beardon, Lazar, Cooper, etc.
Boylan cannot produce one shred of evidence on his monolith theory such as a single photo etc.
> If things could be proved so easily, we'd only have one religion ... and so on and so on.
Dream on! :-)
> I think a lot of what Lazar said was "true" whether he actually worked on it or not.
Possibly. I hold an open mind on all of this stuff. He has been discredited, though.
> He may have contrived his story from the Billy Meier "photographs", Betty and Barney Hill's abduction by Zeti Reticuli aliens, and what he heard from friends who worked at Area 51. That doesn't mean none of can't be true.
Agreed.
> Actually some sources have told me if anything, Montauk was a test site for mind control experiments on human guinea pigs.
Correct.
> I posted your history of the P-X at my makeshift site which attempts to
What's the address of your site?
> I do value your input on these subjects.
I cannot give you anything more than I have done without making it up!!
Regards,
bob mailto:
S-053. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding an experiment to create mini-black holes
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : a new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 10:27:09 -0800
Dear Mark:
Thanks. I will look forward to getting the package. Concerning the mini-black hole in the laboratory, we want to create one Gigantic "exciton" (or electron-hole pair) with our aerospace EM propulsion system. We have tried to contact Dr. Andre Mysrywicsz (Univ. of Paris) to see if he would be interested in following up on his proposal to create a Bose_Einstein condensate out of excitons. He proposed this before the Ketterle group at Colorado created a BEC out of hydrogen.
The fact is that a BEC composed out of excitons will last for hours, months, etc. at room temperature. The dielectric force would work in our favor in splitting up N-S, (+)and(-) particle constituents. Anyway, this would be a mini-black hole only attached to our exciton BEC system. Comments?
Regards,
Larry Maurer
UNITEL, Inc.
S-054. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail regarding help in a new Bose-Einstein Condensate
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Fwd: Re: a new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:19:31 -0800
> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:18:52 -0800
> To:
> From: Larry Maurer <>
> Subject: Fwd: Re: a new experiment to confirm superstrings
> Dear Prof. Mysyrowicz:
> We are attempting to set up a laboratory experiment to create a Bose-Einstein condensate of bi-excitonic particles. We would be very happy to work with you and to invite you as a technical consultant. If you are interested please reply and hopefully we can work out an agreeable contract. We would like to get started immediately. I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you.
> Sincerely,
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
> & Director, Engineering
> UNITEL, Inc.
> (503) 232-2740
>
S-055. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding background courses in Riemannian geometry
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Fwd: Re: a new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:32:49 -0800
Mark :
FYI: Very Important!!
Please review the following URL that is about why we have the "capped-cone" or tear-drop shape of our exterior charged space vehicle:
Math 547 - Geometric Structures. Judith Arms, Autumn 2001, MWF 1:30-2:20
'Math 547' is an introduction to the primary concepts and techniques of Riemannian geometry: Riemannian metrics and connections, geodesics, curvature, and Jacobi fields. We will use these tools to prove the fundamental theorems relating curvature and topology: the theorems of Gauss-Bonnet, Cartan-Hadamard, Bonnet, and Cartan-Ambrose-Hicks.
Text: Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature by John M. Lee.
Prerequisites: Math 544/5/6, Topology and Geometry of Manifolds.
I have been asked about background reading and preparation for the course. None is needed beyond knowing the material from 544/5/6. (The second chapter of Riemannian Manifolds contains a quick review of this prerequisite material if you would like a reminder.) However, if you are interested there are a couple of undergraduate texts you could read recreationally as an introduction to some ideas and examples: Riemannian Geometry by Frank Morgan (both the 1993 and 1998 editions) and chapter 12 in "The Shape of Space": How to Visualize Surfaces and 3-Dimensional Manifolds by Jeffrey R. Weeks. (The 1998 edition of Morgan's book will be on reserve.) There's also a Scientific American article "Fiber Bundles and Quantum Theory"' by Bernstein and Phillips, Sci. Am. 245 (July 1981), pp. 122-127 which introduces the reader to Riemannian geometry on surfaces and then applies the ideas to Physics. {Scientific American is available in the Natural Sciences Library.)
The rest of the sequence: We probably will spend the first few weeks of 548 finishing Riemannian Manifolds. The syllabus for the rest of 548 and 549 is yet to be determined but will include introductions to most or all of the following: complex and almost complex structures on manifolds; principal and associated bundles and connections; characteristic classes; symplectic and contact geometry.
S-056. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail to NASA about UNITEL's projects
From : Larry Maurer <>
To :
Subject : Fwd: A new experiment to confirm superstrings
Date : Sat, 10 Nov 2001 21:15:28 -0800
> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 21:12:59 -0800
> To:
> From: Larry Maurer <>
> Subject: Fwd: A new experiment to confirm superstrings
> Dear Jean:
> FYI: We hope that NASA and USAF would be interested in our forthcoming projects that are discussed in the e-mails below. We are hoping that we can acquire further professional assistance to describe our proposed aerospace propulsion system. It is important for any reviewing entity to understand the fiber bundle topology connected with our proposed system.
One main specific area is the connection of the forward projected laser beam and the paraboloidically-curved laser emitting lens that provides the parallel transport mechanism that creates a string-like state. Judith Arms is definitely one individual that can explain mathematically what our design will do. Please advise us as what we should do for applying for grants, etc. if there is any interest in our proposed projects. Thank you,
> Sincerely,
> Larry D. Maurer, Principal
> & Director, Engineering
> UNITEL, Inc.
> (503) 232-2740
>
> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:51:59 -0800
> To:
> From: Larry Maurer <>
> Subject: A new experiment to confirm superstrings
> Dear Dr. Arms:
> We would like to discuss our forthcoming projects that entail construction and testing of prototypes with our subcontractors; Applied Sciences, Inc., UIC Microphysics Labs, Rolls Royce Deutschland and Flight Unlimited. We need technical support to explore geometrodynamics and fiber bundle connection and related effects concerned with our proposed project. I think you will be interested in what we are attempting to accomplish with our patented invention that was strongly based on Bernstein&Phillips 1981 Scientific Americanarticle. We would love to hear from you Judith in regards to your valued opinion to what we are trying to accomplish. Thank you,