PLATO® Courses World Literature, Semester B
27
PLATO® Courses World Literature, Semester B
Contents
World Literature, Semester B
Course Components 3
World Literature, Semester B, Overview 5
World Literature, Semester B, Curriculum Contents and Pacing Guide 6
Course Components
Lesson Activities and Assessments
· Lesson Tutorials. Tutorials provide direct instruction on the lesson topic. Students explore the content through the tutorial and then apply their knowledge in the lesson quiz and lesson submission.
· Lesson Quizzes. Lesson quizzes are assessments designed to measure students’ mastery of lesson objectives. A lesson quiz consists of a set of multiple-choice items that are graded by the system.
· Lesson Submissions. Lesson submissions are designed to measure students’ mastery of lesson objectives. Submissions consist of a set of subjective questions. Students submit these essay-type questions for grading through the Digital Drop Box. Teachers score submissions based on the subjective assessment rubric provided below.
Course-Level Activities and Assessments
· Labs. These occasional activities (when they appear in any course) are written assessment assignments that allow students to apply their learning in a significant way. They are designed to be an authentic learning and assessment tool, allowing students to do something real to develop new understanding and providing a subjective measure of that understanding. Teachers score these assignments based on the subjective assessment rubric provided below.
· Midterms. Midterms are designed to ensure that students are retaining what they have learned. Midterms consists of a set of multiple-choice items that are graded by the system.
· Final Exams. Final exams are designed to ensure that students have learned and retained the critical course content. Final exams consist of a set of multiple-choice items that are graded by the system.
Subjective Assessment
Subjective assessment activities (such as lesson submissions) are designed to address higher-level thinking skills and operations. Subjective assessment activities employ the Digital Drop Box, which enables students to submit work in a variety of electronic formats. This feature allows for a wide range of authentic learning and assessment opportunities for courses.
Instructors can score students’ work on either a 4-point rubric or a scale of 0 to 100. A sample rubric is provided here for your reference.
Subjective Assessment Rubric (Sample)D/F 0–69
Below Expectations / C 70–79
Basic / B 80–89
Proficient / A 90–100
Outstanding
Relevance of Response / The response does not relate to the topic or is inappropriate or irrelevant. / The response is not on topic or is too brief or low level. The response may be of little value (e.g., a yes or no answer). / The response is generally related to the topic. / The response is consistently on topic and shows insightful thought about the content.
Content of Response / Ideas are not presented in a coherent or logical manner. There are many grammar or spelling errors. / Presentation of ideas is unclear, with little evidence to back up ideas. There are grammar or spelling errors. / Ideas are presented coherently, although there is some lack of connection to the topic. There are few grammar or spelling errors. / Ideas are expressed clearly, with an obvious connection to the topic. There are rare instances of grammar or spelling errors.
World Literature, Semester B, Overview
Each of the 11 lessons in this semester of World Literature includes objectives, reading assignments, lesson notes, literary concepts, and vocabulary terms.This semester includes two writing assignments: a Research Paper and an essay onHamlet.The teacher will determine the due date for this assignment and the way in which the student will submit it (paper, disk, or email).
World Literature, Semester B, Curriculum Contents and Pacing Guide
This semester of the course is based on a selection of some of the world’s greatest literature. Throughout this course, the emphasis is on the common themes found across cultures and historical timelines. The main textbook for the literature portion of this course is World LiteratureRevised Edition(Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1998). For the writing portion the student may useWriters Inc.: School to Work(D.C. Heath and Co., 1996) or any other composition text provided by the teacher.
This course contains 11 lessons, two labs, a midterm, and a final exam. The lessons vary in length, becoming slightly longer and more complicated as the semester progresses. A suggested pacing guide is provided here.
Day / Activity/Objective / Common Core State Standard / Type1 day:
1 / Syllabus and Plato Student Orientation
Review the Plato Student Orientation and Course Syllabus at the beginning of this course / Course Orientation
6 days:
2–7 / The Middle Ages
· Gain an overview of literature during the Middle Ages.
· Interpret and respond to medieval literature.
· Recognize the characteristics of epic poetry.
· Understand and analyze a tragic flaw in a character.
· Analyze the symbolic features of theDivine Comedy. / RL.11-12.1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
RL.11-12.3. Analyze the impact of the author’s choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g., where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed).
RL.11-12.6. Analyze a case in which grasping a point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g., satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement).
RL.11-12.10. By the end of grade 11, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, in the grades 11-CCR text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range.
RI.11-12.1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
RI.11-12.8. Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning (e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions and dissents) and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy (e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses).
W.11-12.1a. Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
W.11-12.1b. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.
W.11-12.1c. Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims.
W.11-12.1d. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.
W.11-12.1e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented.
SL.11-12.6. Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and tasks, demonstrating a command of formal English when indicated or appropriate. / Lesson
7 days:
8–14 / The Renaissance to the Enlightenment—Part I
· Analyze part of a novel from the Renaissance period.
· Understand parody.
· Gain an overview of some major works of literature during the Renaissance. / RL.11-12.1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
RL.11-12.2. Determine two or more themes or central ideas of a text and analyze their development over the course of the text, including how they interact and build on one another to produce a complex account; provide an objective summary of the text.
RL.11-12.3. Analyze the impact of the author’s choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g., where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed).
RL.11-12.4. Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone, including words with multiple meanings or language that is particularly fresh, engaging, or beautiful. (Include Shakespeare as well as other authors.)
RL.11-12.6. Analyze a case in which grasping a point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g., satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement).
RL.11-12.7. Analyze multiple interpretations of a story, drama, or poem (e.g., recorded or live production of a play or recorded novel or poetry), evaluating how each version interprets the source text. (Include at least one play by Shakespeare and one play by an American dramatist.)
RL.11-12.9. Demonstrate knowledge of eighteenth-, nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century foundational works of American literature, including how two or more texts from the same period treat similar themes or topics.
RL.11-12.10. By the end of grade 11, read and comprehend literature, including stories, dramas, and poems, in the grades 11-CCR text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range.
RI.11-12.1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
RI.11-12.8. Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning (e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions and dissents) and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy (e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses).
W.11-12.6. Use technology, including the Internet, to produce, publish, and update individual or shared writing products in response to ongoing feedback, including new arguments or information.
W.11-12.7. Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
W.11-12.8. Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.
W.11-12.9a. Apply grades 11–12 Reading standards to literature (e.g., “Demonstrate knowledge of eighteenth-, nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century foundational works of American literature, including how two or more texts from the same period treat similar themes or topics”).
W.11-12.9b. Apply grades 11–12 Reading standards to literary nonfiction (e.g., “Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning [e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court Case majority opinions and dissents] and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy [e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses]”).
SL.11-12.1a. Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned exchange of ideas.
SL.11-12.2. Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) in order to make informed decisions and solve problems, evaluating the credibility and accuracy of each source and noting any discrepancies among the data. / Lesson
8 days:
15–22 / Research Paper Assignment / W.11-12.1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
W.11-12.1a. Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
W.11-12.1b. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.
W.11-12.1c. Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims.
W.11-12.1d. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.
W.11-12.1e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented.
W.11-12.4. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. (Grade-specific expectations for writing types are defined in standards 1–3 above.)
W.11-12.5. Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on addressing what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience.
W.11-12.6. Use technology, including the Internet, to produce, publish, and update individual or shared writing products in response to ongoing feedback, including new arguments or information.
W.11-12.7. Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
W.11-12.8. Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.