Table S2.Details of Datasets Included in Meta-Analysis

Table S2.Details of datasets included in meta-analysis

Plant species, pollinator mobility, life form and mating system information included in the meta-analysis (nfamilies, total number of families per group; tm, multilocus outcrossing rate; tm-ts, biparental inbreeding estimate; rp, multilocus correlated paternity;± one standard deviation).

Forest or 'best on offer' group / Fragmented group
Species / Pollinator mobility / Life form / nfamilies / tm / tm-ts / rp / nfamilies / tm / tm-ts / rp / Reference
Acacia anfractuosa / Non-mobile / Shrub / 10 / 0.89 ± 0.20 / 0.01 ± 0.20 / 0.15 ± 0.20 / 10 / 0.85 ± 0.20 / 0.05 ± 0.20 / 0.06 ± 0.20 / (Coates et al, 2007)
Banksia oligantha / Mobile / Shrub / 10 / 1.00 ± 0.20 / 0.01 ± 0.20 / 0.09 ± 0.20 / 10 / 0.98 ± 0.20 / 0.03 ± 0.20 / 0.03 ± 0.20 / (Coates et al, 2007)
Banksia sphaerocarpa var. caesia / Mobile / Shrub / 11 / 0.99 ± 0.34 / 0.04 ± 0.13 / 0.33 ± 0.10 / 10 / 0.91 ± 0.04 / 0.04 ± 0.19 / 0.34 ± 0.10 / (Llorens et al, 2011)
Calothamnus quadrifidus / Mobile / Shrub / 20 / 0.70 ± 0.22 / 0.02 ± 0.09 / 0.27 ± 0.27 / 20 / 0.54 ± 0.45 / 0.01 ± 0.13 / 0.08 ± 0.09 / (Yates et al, 2007)
Carapa guianensis / Non-mobile / Tree / 21 / 0.94 ± 0.12 / 0.02 ± 0.07 / 0.05 ± 0.06 / 21 / 0.93 ± 0.15 / 0.03 ± 0.08 / 0.05 ± 0.06 / (Cloutier et al, 2007)
Carapa guianensis / Non-mobile / Tree / 20 / 0.97 ± 0.10 / 20 / 0.99 ± 0.13 / (Hall et al, 1994)
Carapa procera / Non-mobile / Tree / 33 / 0.85 ± 0.05 / 0.11 ± 0.02 / 14 / 0.63 ± 0.08 / 0.06 ± 0.02 / (Doligez and Joly, 1997)
Caryocar brasiliense / Mobile / Tree / 14 / 1.00 ± 0.00 / 0.21 ± 0.03 / 0.19 ± 0.19 / 10 / 1.00 ± 0.00 / 0.23 ± 0.03 / 0.17 ± 0.05 / (Collevatti et al, 2001)
Cavanillesia platanifolia / Mobile / Tree / 20 / 0.57 ± 0.11 / 11 / 0.35 ± 0.08 / (Murawski and Hamrick, 1992)
Ceiba ausculifolia / Mobile / Tree / 36 / 0.96 ± 0.27 / 31 / 0.97 ± 0.03 / (Quesada et al, 2004)
Ceiba grandiflora / Mobile / Tree / 12 / 0.90 ± 0.59 / 18 / 0.91 ± 0.04 / (Quesada et al, 2004)
Dinizia excelsa / Mobile / Tree / 14 / 0.90 ± 0.08 / 6 / 0.86 ± 0.01 / (Dick et al, 2003)
Dipteryx panamensis / Mobile / Tree / 31 / 0.93 ± 0.15 / 0.03 ± 0.13 / 31 / 0.87 ± 0.18 / 0.06 ± 0.15 / (Hanson et al, 2008)
Dryobalanops aromatica / Non-mobile / Tree / 10 / 0.86 ± 0.34 / 29 / 0.79 ± 0.04 / (Hall et al, 1994)
Dryobalanops aromatica / Non-mobile / Tree / 10 / 0.92 ± 0.04 / 0.08 ± 0.03 / 0.11 ± 0.06 / 10 / 0.77 ± 0.06 / 0.04 ± 0.01 / 0.39 ± 0.08 / (Lee, 2000)
Embotrium coccineum / Mobile / Tree / 18 / 0.84 ± 0.34 / 0.08 ± 0.88 / 0.18 ± 0.38 / 2 / 0.73 ± 0.27 / 0.00 ± 0.16 / 0.07 ± 0.51 / (Mathiasen et al, 2007)
Enterolobium cyclocarpum / Mobile / Tree / 20 / 1.00 ± 0.16 / 0.02 ± 0.10 / 0.10 ± 0.16 / 20 / 1.00 ± 0.25 / 0.02 ± 0.10 / 0.19 ± 0.30 / (Rocha and Aguilar, 2001)
Eucalyptus benthamii / Non-mobile / Tree / 16 / 0.68 ± 0.05 / 0.17 ± 0.11 / 0.43 ± 0.35 / 11 / 0.50 ± 0.12 / 0.31 ± 0.30 / 0.29 ± 0.11 / (Butcher et al, 2005)
Eucalyptus globulus (Tasmania) / Non-mobile / Tree / 20 / 0.89 ± 0.09 / 0.04 ± 0.06 / 0.12 ± 0.09 / 20 / 0.65 ± 0.21 / 0.06 ± 0.07 / 0.06 ± 0.07 / (Mimura et al, 2009)
Eucalyptus globulus (Victoria) / Non-mobile / Tree / 20 / 0.86 ± 0.14 / 0.06 ± 0.07 / 0.20 ± 0.14 / 20 / 0.79 ± 0.27 / 0.11 ± 0.09 / 0.03 ± 0.05 / (Mimura et al, 2009)
Eucalyptus gracilis / Non-mobile / Tree / 20 / 0.98 ± 0.01 / 0.11 ± 0.02 / 0.06 ± 0.01 / 12 / 0.74 ± 0.08 / 0.16 ± 0.03 / 0.32 ± 0.06 / this study
Eucalyptus incrassata / Mobile / Tree / 8 / 0.96 ± 0.07 / 0.08 ± 0.04 / 0.10 ± 0.03 / 16 / 0.94 ± 0.03 / 0.19 ± 0.03 / 0.16 ± 0.03 / this study
Eucalyptus marginata / Non-mobile / Tree / 10 / 0.80 ± 0.28 / 0.08 ± 0.06 / 0.92 ± 0.32 / 10 / 0.71 ± 0.35 / 0.14 ± 0.13 / 0.78 ± 0.28 / (Millar et al, 2000)
Eucalyptus rameliana / Mobile / Tree / 10 / 0.93 ± 0.20 / 0.05 ± 0.20 / 0.11 ± 0.20 / 10 / 0.51 ± 0.20 / 0.04 ± 0.20 / 0.13 ± 0.20 / (Coates et al, 2007)
Eucalyptus socialis / Non-mobile / Tree / 16 / 0.84 ± 0.04 / 0.20 ± 0.03 / 0.32 ± 0.10 / 13 / 0.73 ± 0.09 / 0.23 ± 0.05 / 0.13 ± 0.04 / this study
Grevillea iaspicula / Mobile / Shrub / 10 / 1.00 ± 0.05 / 0.04 ± 0.05 / 0.44 ± 0.05 / 10 / 0.96 ± 0.05 / 0.03 ± 0.05 / 0.31 ± 0.05 / (Hoebee and Young, 2001)
Hakea carinata / Non-mobile / Shrub / 6 / 0.12 ± 0.50 / 8 / 0.09 ± 0.50 / (Starr and Carthew, 1998)
Helicteres brevispira / Mobile / Shrub / 19 / 0.65 ± 0.05 / 0.02 ± 0.02 / 22 / 0.49 ± 0.04 / 0.02 ± 0.02 / (Franceschinelli and Bawa, 2000)
Lambertia orbifolia / Mobile / Shrub / 10 / 0.65 ± 0.20 / 0.05 ± 0.20 / 0.11 ± 0.20 / 10 / 0.38 ± 0.20 / 0.03 ± 0.20 / 0.12 ± 0.20 / (Coates et al, 2007)
Magnolia stellata / Non-mobile / Tree / 20 / 0.74 ± 0.55 / 0.04 ± 0.66 / 10 / 0.62 ± 0.10 / 0.08 ± 0.12 / (Hirayama et al, 2007)
Magnolia stellata / Non-mobile / Tree / 35 / 0.68 ± 0.69 / 0.09 ± 0.27 / 0.33 ± 0.67 / 39 / 0.65 ± 0.09 / 0.11 ± 0.60 / 0.05 ± 0.10 / (Tamaki et al, 2009)
Myrtus communis / Non-mobile / Shrub / 22 / 0.34 ± 0.09 / 0.02 ± 0.02 / 0.19 ± 0.42 / 10 / 0.13 ± 0.10 / 0.02 ± 0.05 / 0.11 ± 0.13 / (González-Varo et al, 2010)
Pachira quinata / Mobile / Tree / 15 / 0.92 ± 0.17 / 0.74 ± 0.46 / 15 / 0.78 ± 0.07 / 0.47 ± 0.33 / (Fuchs et al, 2003)
Platypodium elegans / Non-mobile / Tree / 5 / 0.90 ± 0.10 / 5 / 0.92 ± 0.10 / (Murawski and Hamrick, 1991)
Prunus avium / Non-mobile / Tree / 10 / 0.14 ± 0.05 / 10 / 0.09 ± 0.05 / (Jolivet et al, 2011)
Psychotria tenuinervis / Non-mobile / Shrub / 18 / 0.50 ± 0.44 / 0.07 ± 0.13 / 0.15 ± 0.24 / 24 / 0.37 ± 0.05 / 0.05 ± 0.10 / 0.07 ± 0.21 / (Ramos et al, 2008)
Samanea saman / Mobile / Tree / 20 / 0.99 ± 0.01 / 0.12 ± 0.41 / 17 / 0.91 ± 0.01 / 0.03 ± 0.19 / (Cascante et al, 2002)
Senna miltijuga / Mobile / Tree / 22 / 0.54 ± 0.34 / 0.05 ± 0.08 / 0.31 ± 0.58 / 14 / 0.84 ± 0.04 / 0.11 ± 0.13 / 0.25 ± 0.72 / (Ribeiro and Lovato, 2004)
Shorea curtisii / Non-mobile / Tree / 11 / 0.96 ± 0.03 / 5 / 0.52 ± 0.02 / (Obayashi et al, 2002)
Shorea megistophylla / Mobile / Tree / 8 / 0.87 ± 0.16 / 22 / 0.71 ± 0.10 / (Murawski et al, 1994)
Sorocea affinis / Non-mobile / Tree / 7 / 0.97 ± 0.05 / 8 / 1.00 ± 0.13 / (Murawski and Hamrick, 1991)
Swietenia macrophylla (dry provenances) / Non-mobile / Tree / 23 / 0.99 ± 0.05 / 0.15 ± 0.06 / 0.28 ± 0.08 / 12 / 0.99 ± 0.10 / 0.21 ± 0.09 / 0.15 ± 0.03 / (Breed et al, 2012)
Swietenia macrophylla (mesic provenances) / Non-mobile / Tree / 24 / 0.99 ± 0.04 / 0.15 ± 0.05 / 0.45 ± 0.09 / 12 / 0.85 ± 0.04 / 0.31 ± 0.03 / 0.25 ± 0.05 / (Breed et al, 2012)
Symphonia globulifera / Mobile / Tree / 30 / 0.85 ± 0.20 / 30 / 0.74 ± 0.20 / (Aldrich and Hamrick, 1998)
Verticordia fimbrilepis / Non-mobile / Shrub / 10 / 0.73 ± 0.20 / 0.11 ± 0.20 / 0.14 ± 0.20 / 10 / 0.62 ± 0.20 / 0.06 ± 0.20 / 0.29 ± 0.20 / (Coates et al, 2007)

References

Aldrich PR, Hamrick JL (1998). Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science281(5373): 103-105.

Breed MF, Gardner MG, Ottewell K, Navarro C, Lowe A (2012). Shifts in reproductive assurance strategies and inbreeding costs associated with habitat fragmentation in Central American mahogany Ecol Lett15(5): 444-452.

Butcher PA, Skinner AK, Gardiner CA (2005). Increased inbreeding and inter-species gene flow in remnant populations of the rare Eucalyptus benthamii. Conserv Genet6: 213-226.

Cascante A, Quesada M, Lobo JJ, Fuchs EA (2002). Effects of dry tropical forest fragmentation on the reproductive success and genetic structure of the tree Samanea saman. Conserv Biol16(1): 137-147.

Cloutier D, Kanashiro M, Ciampi AY, Schoen DJ (2007). Impact of selective logging on inbreeding and gene dispersal in an Amazonian tree population of Carapa guianensis Aubl. Mol Ecol16(4): 797-809.

Coates DJ, Sampson JF, Yates CJ (2007). Plant mating systems and assessing population persistence in fragmented landscapes. Aust J Bot55(3): 239-249.

Collevatti RG, Grattapaglia D, Hay JD (2001). High resolution microsatellite based analysis of the mating system allows the detection of significant biparental inbreeding in Caryocar brasiliense, an endangered tropical tree species. Heredity86(1): 60-67.

Dick CW, Etchelecu G, Austerlitz F (2003). Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest. Mol Ecol12(3): 753-764.

Doligez A, Joly H (1997). Mating system of Carapa procera (Meliaceae) in the French Guiana tropical forest. Am J Bot84(4): 461.

Franceschinelli EV, Bawa KS (2000). The effect of ecological factors on the mating system of a South American shrub species (Helicteres brevispira). Heredity84(1): 116-123.

Fuchs E, Lobo J, Quesada M (2003). Effects of forest fragmentation and flowering phenology on the reproductive success and mating patterns of the tropical dry forest tree Pachira quinata. Conserv Biol17(1): 149-157.

González-Varo JP, Albaladejo RG, Aparicio A, Arroyo J (2010). Linking genetic diversity, mating patterns and progeny performance in fragmented populations of a Mediterranean shrub. J Appl Ecol47(6): 1242-1252.

Hall P, Orrell LC, Bawa KS (1994). Genetic diversity and mating system in a tropical tree, Carapa guianensis (Meliaceae). Am J Bot81(9): 1104-1111.

Hanson TR, Brunsfeld SJ, Finegan B, Waits LP (2008). Pollen dispersal and genetic structure of the tropical tree Dipteryx panamensis in a fragmented Costa Rican landscape. Mol Ecol17(8): 2060-2073.

Hirayama K, Ishida K, Setsuko S, Tomaru N (2007). Reduced seed production, inbreeding, and pollen shortage in a small population of a threatened tree, Magnolia stellata. Biol Conserv136(2): 315-323.

Hoebee SE, Young AG (2001). Low neighbourhood size and high interpopulation differentiation in the endangered shrub Grevillea iaspicula McGill (Proteaceae). Heredity86(4): 489-496.

Jolivet C, Höltken AM, Liesebach H, Steiner W, Degen B (2011). Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in four contrasting wild cherry populations (Prunus avium L.). European Journal of Forest Research131(4): 1-15.

Lee SL (2000). Mating system parameters of Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn. f. (Dipterocarpaceae) in three different forest types and a seed orchard. Heredity85: 338-345.

Llorens TM, Byrne M, Yates CJ, Nistelberger HM, Coates DJ (2011). Evaluating the influence of different aspects of habitat fragmentation on mating patterns and pollen dispersal in the bird-pollinated Banksia sphaerocarpa var. caesia. Mol Ecol21(2): 314-328.

Mathiasen P, Rovere AE, Premoli AC (2007). Genetic structure and early effects of inbreeding in fragmented temperate forests of a self-incompatible tree, Embothrium coccineum. Conserv Biol21(1): 232-240.

Millar MA, Byrne M, Coates DJ, Stukely MJC, McComb JA (2000). Mating system studies in jarrah, Eucalyptus marginata (Myrtaceae). Aust J Bot48(4): 475-479.

Mimura M, Barbour RC, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Watanabe KN (2009). Comparison of contemporary mating patterns in continuous and fragmented Eucalyptus globulus native forests. Mol Ecol18(20): 4180-4192.

Murawski DA, Gunatilleke IAUN, Bawa KS (1994). The effects of selective logging on inbreeding in Shorea megistophylla (Dipterocarpaceae) from Sri Lanka. Conserv Biol8(4): 997-1002.

Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1991). The effect of the density of flowering individuals on the mating systems of nine tropical tree species. Heredity67(2): 167-174.

Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1992). The mating system of Cavanillesia platanifolia under extremes of flowering-tree density : a test of predictions. Biotropica24: 99-101.

Obayashi K, Tsumura Y, Ihara-Ujino T, Niiyama K, Tanouchi H, Suyama Y et al (2002). Genetic diversity and outcrossing rate between undisturbed and selectively logged forests of Shorea curtisii (Dipterocarpaceae) using microsatellite dna analysis. Int J Plant Sci163(1): 151-158.

Quesada M, Stoner KE, Lobo JA, Herrerias-Diego Y, Palacios-Guevara C, Munguía-Rosas MA et al (2004). Effects of forest fragmentation on pollinator activity and consequences for plant reproductive success and mating patterns in bat-pollinated Bombacaceous trees. Biotropica36(2): 131-138.

Ramos F, Zucchi M, Solferini V, Santos F (2008). Mating systems of Psychotria tenuinervis (Rubiaceae): distance from anthropogenic and natural edges of Atlantic forest fragment. Biochem Genet46(1): 88-100.

Ribeiro RA, Lovato MB (2004). Mating system in a neotropical tree species, Senna multijuga (Fabaceae). Genet Mol Biol27(3): 418-424.

Rocha OJ, Aguilar G (2001). Reproductive biology of the dry forest tree Enterolobium cyclocarpum (guanacaste) in Costa Rica: a comparison between trees left in pastures and trees in continuous forest. Am J Bot88(9): 1607-1614.

Starr GJ, Carthew SM (1998). Genetic differentiation in isolated populations of Hakea carinata (Proteaceae). Aust J Bot46(6): 671-682.

Tamaki I, Ishida K, Setsuko S, Tomaru N (2009). Interpopulation variation in mating system and late-stage inbreeding depression in Magnolia stellata. Mol Ecol18(11): 2365-2374.

Yates CJ, Coates DJ, Elliott C, Byrne M (2007). Composition of the pollinator community, pollination and the mating system for a shrub in fragments of species rich kwongan in south-west Western Australia. Biodivers Conserv16: 1379-1395.