Mailing Address: PO Box 520, Prince Rupert BC V8J 3R7
Location: 825 Conrad Street
Phone: (250) 624-0925Fax: (250) 624-6572
MINISTRY GUIDELINES FOR
Students with Learning Disabilities
Student based funding allocation,
1701 code Q
(This Ministry Guidelines form must be completed before the Learning Services office will confirm a Special Education designation.)
Student______
Grade______
Teacher______
School______
This form completed by______; ______
______; ______
______; ______
Diagnosis or Assessment Documentation ______
Date: ______
School Principal/Vice-Principal ______
Return to District Principal Learning Services
For office use only
Confirm______Reject______
______
District Principal Learning ServicesDate
Comments:______
LearningDisabilitiesStudent base fundingallocation1701 CodeQ
This checklist should only be used in conjunction with Section E.3of SpecialEducationService:AManualofPoliciesProceduresandGuidelines(Nov.2010) / Student’sName
PEN
Date
To be eligible the following must bemet / There must be documentation to support that thestudent has been appropriately assessed and identified bythe school district or independent school authority asmeeting the criteria of the special educationcategory.
assessment documentation shows persistent difficulties inthe acquisition of pre-academic and/or academic skills suchas recognition of letters and numbers in the early primary yearsor acquisition of reading, written language, and/or numeracy, inspite of appropriate opportunities to learn;and
assessment documentation shows average to aboveaverage cognitive ability;and
assessment documentation shows weaknesses incognitive processing that contribute to persistent difficulties withlearning / One or more academic difficulties relative toexpected ability, and identified indocumentation:
Word Recognition, and/or
Reading Comprehension, and/or
Spelling,and/or
Written expression,and/or
Mathematical computations,and/or
Problem Solving
Various achievement instruments can be usedto documentdifficulty.
There is documented evidencethat…
Average or above ability, demonstrated either by acognitive assessment or by average or better performance on anorm referenced test of achievement that measures the student’sability to reason, such as mathematical problem-solving,reading comprehension, written expression and listeningcomprehension. Average ability is demonstrated by scores at or aboveone standard deviation below thenorm.
Significant weakness exists in one or more of thecognitive processes.
Assessments of cognitive processes must utilizenorm-referenced instruments; if other forms of assessment are used, they mustbe accompanied by a clear rationale for why the alternateassessment is appropriate in identifying the student’s processingdisorder.
Assessment documents indicate that the difficultiesbeing experienced are not primarily* due to sensory deficits, lackof opportunity to learn, cultural or linguistic differences,or social/emotional/physical healthissues.
* Learning disabilities may coexist with other disorders such as behaviouralor emotional disorders, sensory impairments, or other medicalconditions. / Measures used as evidence of cognitivefunctioning:
Full scale score, or other norm referencedestimate of ability with rationale for not using full scaleIQ.
Verbal IQ or Performance IQscore
Test of non-verbal cognitive abilityscore
Norm-reference test(s) of academic achievementin listening comprehension, readingcomprehension, mathematics problem solving, or writtenexpression.
Significant weakness in one or morecognitive processes, relative to overallfunctioning:
Perception
Memory
Attention
Languageprocessing
Visual-spatialprocessing
Planning and decisionmaking
Phonologicalprocessing
Processingspeed
Auditoryprocessing
Examples of evidence of other primary sourcesof difficulty addressed in assessmentdocumentation (asappropriate):
Culture and language differences of thehome
Consistency of schooling andattendance
Vision and hearing screeningresults
Medical factors regardingsocial/emotional/physical health
Other
Page 1 of2
Page 2 of2
Learning Disabilities(cont’d)
Student base fundingallocation1701 CodeQ
This checklist should only be used in conjunction with Section E.3of Special Education Service: A Manual of Policies ProceduresandGuidelines (Nov.2010) / Student’sName
PEN
Date
There is documented evidencethat…(cont’d)
The assessment integrates information from a number ofsources (two ormore). / Examples ofdocumentation:
Information from family abouthealth social/emotional status anddevelopmental history
Information from professionals abouthealth social/emotional status anddevelopmental history
Information from classroom teacher(s)about classroomperformance
Information from learningassistance/resource teacher about studentperformance
Information from other professionalsabout strengths and weaknesses
Relevant academichistory
Other
There is documented evidence that…
A current IEP is in place, dated after September 30,previous schoolyear.
The IEP has individualized goals and measurable objectives,with adaptations and or modifications where appropriate,and strategies to meet thesegoals.
The goals correspond to the category in which the studentis identified.
The student is receiving special education services to addressthe needs identified in the assessment documentation.These services are outlined in the IEP and relate to the identifiedneeds of thestudent.
The student is being offered learning activities in accordancewith the IEP.
The IEP outlines methods for measuring progress in relationto the IEPgoals.
A parent was offered the opportunity to be consultedabout preparation of theIEP.
Reduction in class size is not by itself a sufficientservice. / Examples ofstrategies:
Intense, direct instruction
Skill-buildinginstruction
Instruction in learning andcompensatory strategies
Skill building in selfadvocacy
Adaptations to instruction andassessment
Adaptations to learning resources,technology
Social skills training,etc.