Telephone: 090-786 50 00
Telefax: 090-786 99 95 / Individual Studyplan
for Doctoral Education
Date / Page 2 (9)
INDIVIDUAL STUDY AND FUNDING PLAN WITH FOLLOW-UP FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION AT UMEÅ UNIVERSITY
Section B) Follow-up for the year and revision for the year
(To be completed at the yearly evaluation)
Doctoral Student
Name / Date of birthDepartment
Home telephone (incl. area code) / Work telephone (incl. area code) / Mobile telephone
Principal Supervisor
NameDepartment
Home telephone (incl. area code) / Work telephone (incl. area code) / Mobile telephone)
Assistant Supervisor
NameDepartment
Home telephone (incl. area code) / Work telephone (incl. area code) / Mobile telephone
Assistant Supervisor
NameDepartment
Home telephone (incl. area code) / Work telephone (incl. area code) / Mobile telephone
Reference person (for PhD students admitted after 2014-01-01)
NameDepartment
Home telephone (incl. area code) / Work telephone (incl. area code) / Mobile telephone
Doctoral studies subject area
Doctoral school (if any)
Thesis subject/Preliminary title
Date of admission
Estimated date for defence of thesis
1) Work planned and learning outcomes set for the past year
If this document concerns the first year of doctoral studies proceed to point 8.
2) Results/learning outcomes achieved
Append published articles
3) Supervision (e.g. frequency, form etc.)
4) Has supervision been satisfactory for all parties?
Yes NoIf no, specify planned measures for improving supervision.
5) Are studies continuing according to the time and finance plans?
Yes NoIf no, explain why and specify planned measures. An appendix may be attached if necessary.
6) Has the study plan and/or the time and funding plan been revised?
Yes NoIf yes, attach point 10 and/or point 11.
7) Academic credits reported to Ladok
Course and thesis credits / Date8) Detailed planning for the year
Work on thesisFinished thesis chapters/articles, if any (specify timing)
Courses
Other activities that form part of doctoral studies (e.g. conferences, symposia, international experience, brief summary of the reference group meetings)
Planned work hours for doctoral studies next year.
Work hours in % Spring Work hours in % Autumn
Other activities (e.g. teaching, administration)
Planned work hours for other activities next year.
Work hours in % Spring Work hours in % Autumn
9) Signatures
Umeå the
Signature (Doctoral student) / Clarification of signatureSignature (Principal supervisor) / Clarification of signature
Attested by
Signature (Department’s doctoral education officer) / Clarification of signature10) Revised research plan for work on thesis
Give the thesis project’s title, background, targets, methods and preliminary results, if any. Comment on changes in relation to the original research plan and specify possible consequences.
11) Revised time and funding plan
Account for activity in percent, what the doctoral student is to do and how the research plan is to be enacted in terms of time. Comment on changes in relation to the original time and funding plan and specify possible consequences
Learning outcomes for the degree in question
(Higher Education Ordinance, Chapter 6, Sections 4 and 5)
Knowledge and understanding
For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy the third-cycle student shall
· demonstrate broad knowledge and systematic understanding of the research field as well as advanced and up-to-date specialised knowledge in a limited area of this field, and
· demonstrate familiarity with research methodology in general and the methods of the specific field of research in particular.
Competence and skills
For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy the third-cycle student shall
· demonstrate the capacity for scholarly analysis and synthesis as well to review and assess new and complex phenomena, issues and situations autonomously and critically
· demonstrate the ability to identify and formulate issues with scholarly precision critically, autonomously and creatively, and to plan and use appropriate methods to undertake research and other qualified tasks within predetermined time frames and to review and evaluate such work
· demonstrate through a dissertation the ability to make significant contribution to the formation of knowledge through his or her own research
· demonstrate the ability in both national and international contexts to present and discuss research and research findings authoritatively in speech and writing and in dialogue with the academic community and in society in general
· demonstrate the ability to identify the need for further knowledge and
· demonstrate the capacity to contribute to social development and support the learning of others both through research and education and in some other qualified professional capacity.
Judgement and approach
For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy the third-cycle student shall
· demonstrate intellectual autonomy and disciplinary rectitude as well as the ability to make assessments of research ethics, and
· demonstrate specialised insight into the possibilities and limitations of research, its role in society and the responsibility of the individual for how this is used.