EVALUATION – 2017MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORY CONFERENCE
Please take the time to fill out this evaluation form for the conference. Your responses will help make next year’s conference even better! Please use the following scale to evaluate the conference:
1 2 3 4 5 Not Applicable
Most Least
CONFERENCE SESSIONS
Morning General Session: A World War I Soldier’s Story - Ed & Nancy Bodmer
How informative was the session1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Presentation of talk1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Did the session cover the material expected1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Additional comments:
Morning Concurrent Session: Please check the session you attended.
A. ___Option 1: Jewish Developers and the Early Jewish Community –Clare Lise Kelly
B. ___Option 2: Warren Historic Site- Shelley Stokes-Hammond
C. ___Option 3: History Gems- Sandy Spring Museum, Ag. History Farm Park, Woodlawn Visitor’s Center, American Legion Post 295, National Museum of Health & Medicine
D. ___Option 4: Location, Locale, and Belonging: Latino Perspectives. – Maria Sprehn-Malagon, Ph.D.
How informative was the session1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Presentation of talk1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Did the session cover the material expected1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Additional comments:
Afternoon Concurrent Session: Please check the session you attended.
A. ___Option 1: Oakley Cabin: Revisited – Heather Bouslog B. ___Option 2: Twenty Years of Historic Preservation Work in Montgomery Co. – Richard Striner
C. ___Option 3: History Tools: How to Protect Your Local Historic Burial Grounds – Coalition to Protect Maryland Burial sites
D. ___ Option 4: Tsunami: The Election of 1962 – Bill Offutt
How informative was the session1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Presentation of talk1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Did the session cover the material expected1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Additional comments:
Afternoon General Session: Feast Your Ears: The Story of WHFS 102.3 FM - J. Schlossberg, Weasel, M. Elrich, M. Seagraves
How informative was the session1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Presentation of talk1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Did the session cover the material expected1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Additional comments:
GENERAL
Did the conference meet your expectations?1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Registration
Was it easy to register for the conference?1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Was the registration form clear?1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Did check-in go smoothly?1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Where did you hear about the conference?
Comments on Registration:
Conference Organization, Location and Catering
Were the start and end times good?1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Was there enough time per session? 1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Was the topic selection appropriate? 1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Were the rooms comfortable?1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Did you enjoy the breakfast selection?1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Did you enjoy the lunch selection?1(most) 23 4 5(least) N/A
Additional Comments:
NEXT YEAR
Are there topics and/or speakers you would recommend for next year?
Are you interested in being on the conference planning committee? If so, please list your name, organization with which you are affiliated, daytime phone and email.
Other comments: