THE MORECAMBE AND WISE SHOW

It happened one night. It happened, to be precise, at 8.55 p.m. on the night of 25 December 1977, when an estimated 28,835,000 people – more than half of the total population of the United Kingdom – tuned their television sets to BBC1 and spent the next hour and ten minutes in the company of a rather tall man called Eric and a rather short man called Ernie. It was an extraordinary night for British television. It was – at least as far as that catholic and capacious category known as ‘light entertainment’ was concerned – as close as British television had ever come, in some forty-one years of trying , to being a genuine mass medium. None of the usual rigid divisions and omissions were apparent in the broad audience of that remarkable night: no stark class bias, no pronounced gender imbalance, no obvious age asymmetry, no generalized demographic slant.

It was also, of course, an extraordinary night for the two stars of the show: Eric Morecambe and Ernie Wise – by far the most illustrious, and best-loved, double act that Britain has ever produced. Exceptionally professional yet endearingly personable, they were wonderful together as partners, as friends, as almost a distinct entity: not ‘Morecambe and Wise’ but ‘Morecambewise’. There was Eric and there was Ernie: one of them an idiot, the other a bigger idiot, each of them half a star, together a whole star, forever hopeful of that ‘brand new, bright tomorrow’ that they sang about at the end of each show. True, Eric would often slap Ernie smartly on the cheeks, but they clearly thought the world of each other, and the world thought a great deal of them, too.

Their show succeeded in attracting such a massive following on that memorable night because it had, over the course of the previous nine years or so, established, and then enhanced, an enviable reputation for consistency, inventiveness, unparalleled professional polish and, last but by no means least, a strong and sincere respect for its audience. The Morecambe and Wise Show stood for something greater, something far more precious, than mere first-rate but evanescent entertainment; it had come to stand – just as persuasively and as proudly as any earnest documentary or any epic drama – for excellence in broadcasting, the result not just of two gifted performers (great talent, alas, does not of itself guarantee great television) but also of a richly proficient and supremely committed production team.

When viewers watched that show at the end of 1977, they witnessed a rare and rich compendium of the very best in popular culture: the happy summation of a joint career that had traversed all of the key developments associated with the rise of mass entertainment in Britain, encompassing the faint but still discernible traces of Victorian music-hall, the crowded animation of Edwardian Variety, the wordy populism of the wireless, the spectacular impact of the movies and finally, the more intimate pervasiveness of television. When that career was all over, it was sorely missed. They were simply irreplaceable.

1. The writer implies in the first paragraph that one reason why the show on 25 December 1977 was extraordinary was that

  1. light entertainment programmes had been the targets of criticism before then.
  2. no one had thought that a British television programme could appeal to all classes.
  3. its audience included people who might not have been expected to watch it.
  4. People tuning into it knew that they were taking part in a phenomenal event.

2. In the second paragraph, the writer implies that Morecambe and Wise

A. would probably not have been as successful had they been solo performers.

B. had a different relationship in real life from the one they had on television.

C. were keen for audiences to realize how professional they were.

D. probably did not know how popular they were.

3. The writer says in the third paragraph that one reason why The Morecambe and Wise Show remained so popular was that

A. it adapted to changes in audience attitudes to what constituted good entertainment.

B. it appealed to people who normally preferred other kinds of programme.

C. the people who made it knew that its popularity was guaranteed.

D. the contribution of people other than its stars was a key element in it.

4. In the last paragraph, the writer implies that one remarkable feature of the show was that

A. it exceeded even the expectations of its audience.

B. it contained elements that could have been regarded as old-fashioned.

C. it broke with previous traditions.

D. it contained a hint of sadness despite being so entertaining.

5. The writer says that ‘great talent, alas, does not of itself guarantee great television.’ How far do you agree or disagree?

______

6. How important is TV to you? Could you do without it for a month and, if so, what benefits might that bring you? ______

LUDWIG VAN BEETHOVEN

For many people, Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827) is the most (1) ______figure in the history of western classical music. His (2)______talent was already clearly evident as a young man, (3)______surviving a somewhat unconventional (4) ______during which his eccentric father would often force him to take music lessons in the middle of the night.

The young Beethoven's ability won him the admiration of the leading contemporary musical figures. Throughout the 1790s he worked hard to secure the interest of wealthy patrons. Such patronage (5)______him to concentrate on becoming a successful composer.

Despite his awe-inspiring musical (6)______,his personal life was something of a disaster. His day-to-day (7) ______with people invariably turned out to be rather turbulent. Although he apparently fell in love with a number of society women, the identity of the girl who lay closest to his heart remains (8) ______to this day. However, just at the point when Beethoven was beginning to reap the rewards of his early endeavours, he had to come to terms with the crushing realisation that his increasing (9) ______was (10) ______. From that point on, his music displayed a striking change in style, becoming both heavier in tone and larger in scale.

  1. INFLUENCE______
  2. ORDINARY______
  3. MERCY ______
  4. BRING ______
  5. ABLE______
  6. ACHIEVE______
  7. RELATION______
  8. ELUDE______
  9. DEAF______
  10. CURE______