Assessment Report Evaluation & Feedback Rubric
Program Name:
- Does the report clearly state which Student Learning Outcomes the program was trying to assess? Yes No
1a. Do the Student Learning Outcomes assessed contain some level of consistency with the University General Education Outcomes? (For example, do they assess critical thinking, communication skills, etc…?)
Yes No
Comments:
- Are all of the SLOs listed in the report assessed?
Yes No
2a. If not, which listed SLOs are not assessed?
Comments:
- Is each assessment measure employedclearly identified and described?
Yes No
Comments:
- Does the report demonstrate the use of direct (observed) measures of assessment?
Yes No
If yes, list:
Comments:
- Does the report demonstrate the use of indirect (inferred) measures of assessment?
Yes No
If yes, list:
Comments:
- Is there an assessment measure employed that creates an external comparison?(Specifically, does the measure allow the program to compare its students to their peers at other institutions?)
Yes No
If yes, list:
Comments:
- Do the measures adopted allow for a valid assessment of the program’s Student Learning Outcomes? (i.e., Will the measures used allow the program to ascertain whether students are achieving the program’s SLOs?)
Yes No
Comments:
- Is there evidence that the assessment data has been communicated/discussed across the department?
Yes No
Comments:
- Has the program provided evidence that they have used the data collected to improve student learning?
Yes No
Comments:
Summary Rating:
Overall, this assessment report demonstrates the following category of assessment
Level 1-This program is in the early phases of developing an assessment program and has not yet provided evidence that they are employing assessment measures to improve student learning.
Level 2-This program has developed an assessment program and has provided some evidence that they are employing assessment measures to improve student learning. However, the assessment report demonstrates an inconsistent or sporadic implementation of its assessment plan.This may include an unbalanced usage of direct or indirect measures.
Level 3-This program has developed an assessment program and has provided substantial evidence to demonstrate that they are employing assessment measures and using the data from these measures to improve student learning. This includes the usage of both direct and indirect measures to assess student learning.
Level 4- The program report demonstrates a consistent and significant process for the use of assessment data to improve student learning. This process includes the use of multiple direct and indirect measures to assess student learning. This program has created a “Culture of Assessment” where assessment has become institutionalized in order to achieve continual improvement of student learning.
- Additional Comments or Feedback: