Communications Case Study – ICA Element One Feedback Sheet
Student Name: / Overall Grade:Module Title: / Communications Case Study / Module Tutor:
Module Code: HCC
Assignment Title: / ICAElement1 - Formal Report / Pathway:
PLEASE NOTE: The Area Grade relating to your work will be highlighted
Exploration of issues:P / Explores most main issues surrounding the topic and demonstrates a basic understanding of them. Requires some/more exploration regarding: H/W, S/W, Networks, Printers, Licensing
M / Explores the majority of issues surrounding the topic. Needs some/more exploration regarding: H/W, S/W, Networks, Printers, Licensing
D / Explores all issues surrounding the topic
Understanding of issues:
P / Demonstrates understanding of the basic issues relating to the given topic
M / Demonstrates understanding of the main issues surrounding the topic
D / Demonstrate understanding of all issues surrounding the topic
Report Format:
P / Is presented in logical sections
M / In the majority of areas, conforms to the report format provided
D / Conforms to the report format provided
Organisation of Material:
P / Organises the majority of the material in a logical manner
M / Organises the material in a logical manner
D / Develops a logical argument in a sequential, organised manner
Irrelevant / Repetitive Material:
P / Contains little irrelevant or repetitive material
M / Contains no irrelevant and little repetitive material
D / Contains no irrelevant or repetitive material
Sources of Information:
P / Uses likely sources of information
M / Demonstrates the use of a wide ranging reference material
D / Demonstrates the use of critical and wide ranging reference material
Word-Processing / Spelling Errors:
P / Demonstrates a satisfactory level of word-processing
M / Contains minor typographical orspelling errors.
D / Contains no typographical or spelling errors
Grammar Syntax:
P / Demonstrates a satisfactory level of grammar/syntax
M / Demonstrates a good level of grammar/syntax and is not too difficult to read or understand
D / Demonstrates an excellent level of grammar/syntax and is easy to read and understand
PDP:
P / Provides Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ), reflection on assessment
M / Provides LSQ, reflection on assessment plus self review of learning to-date that demonstrates some reflection of skills acquired
D / Provides LSQ, reflection on assessment plus self review of learning to-date that demonstrates an in-depth reflection of skills acquired
NOTE: Overall Comments will be highlighted
The scenario was not developed i.e. what are the task requirements for the system [It was not sufficient just to quote the problem specification.] / Recommended report structure not followed (Title page, Contents, Introduction, Main Body, Conclusion, References, Appendices).Hardware inadequately discussed and/or does not meet task requirement / Chapter/section headings not meaningful (A heading of Main Body is meaningless).
Software inadequately discussed and/or does not meet task requirement / Chapter and/or section heading not numbered
Summary of hardware & software recommendations not clear - need to review several pages/sections / Content page chapters and/or sections not numbered.
Insufficient alternative solutions were considered
(e.g. only one of each type). / Peculiar style of Contents page (should get Word to produce automatically)
Some issues were not considered. / Poor spelling/grammar. (spell/grammar checker not used?)
Only one system / Excessive use of bulleted lists.
Alternative solutions were too similar (e.g. all standard bundles from shops). / Report contains irrelevancies/repetitions
Report was too technical for someone who knew very little about computers. / Inappropriate material in Appendices.
Some undefined abbreviations. / Poor referencing style.
Material not logically organized. / Insufficient references.
Total costs, warranties, delivery times not clearly stated. / Poor layout of printed pages (Word used badly?)
Main body contains material that should have been moved to Appendices. / Report too long or too short.
Conclusions/recommendations did not relate to the stated scenario or were not justified. / Poor title page (cover)
Informal language used. Too much personalisation (i.e. excessive use of “I”, “My” or “You”). / Pages not numbered.
Chapters didn’t start on new pages.
Signed: