A. Bakre294.0/5Fibonacci Yields Some Bad Results, Denominator Required Positive
Test and Assignments, SP1-00
Results (A1,A2,Test)
NameDateMarkComment(s)
A. Bakre294.0/5fibonacci yields some bad results, denominator required positive
17/43/10late and copies Kanzaria
4.0
N. Bessemer295.0/5the guessing program is not much friendly
-
8.5
E. Boaman295.0/5suspiciously professionally
233.5coincides: Okeneme, Tang, Walia Zizzi (actually, with S. Lea) 9.0
A. Brace294.7/5division by zero shouldn’t be done
-
6.0
V. Ciamaroni255.0/5very good programs; but why numbers are only positive?
the name of Fibonacci left …
2710/10time is determined and taken into account
9.0
S. Diamond295.0/5three attempts is a nice idea, but rounding numbers may be rough
289/10double menue system: I saw it already, but where?(Jaffa)
6.0
K. Edwards245.0/5some smart decisions; examples of runs provided
207/10no real use of arrays
8.0
Z. Hamid285.0/5nicely printed Fibonacci
276/10follows my program and that of J. Moreland
7.0
L. Hinds-
-
8.0
P. Horler075.0/5professionally done
2010/10well done, professionally
8.5
T. Howlett294.5/5the disc is empty
3.48/10a professional piece; late
8.0
H. Hubrecht294.0/5fibonacci yields some bad results, denominator required positive
288.0/10a copy of I.Obianyo; some logical incorrectnesses
7.0
D. Jaffa284.9/5nice code, inconsistent wording
279/10double menue, resembles something (Dimond, though different)
5.5
A. Jagiello295.0/5nicely done guessing game - via subroutines; screened examples
20/310/10nicely done
7.0
R. Kamusasa291.0/5obvious copy of Kiambuthi's
283.5/10the program uses a method; nothing relates to maintaining seats
4.0
L. Kanzaria291.6/5the lock program works; should have spent more time
17/44.5/10still an error doesn't finish if wrong
1.0
D. Kawaiyda295.0/5the lock program seems too reserved
286.5/10the program works and maintains things
4.5
D. Kiambuthi294.3/5also non-negativity condition, fibonacci last numbers not exact
283/10doesn't work, though has an idea
3.5
P. Keaveney295.0/5zero divided by y is rejected; fibonacci both numbers participate
298/10decent program, though resembles the others
6.0
S. Kingsley29 4.2/5checking safe doesn’t want to finish
2210/10poizdevalsia nado mnoi (opiat' pr. ne konchaet)
9.5
S. Lea074.6/5 testing should be for zero only, not for non-positive
159.5/10structure coincides with Boaman, no use of Boolean variables
8.5
A. Lee286.0/5smart idea of stopping the PFE screen
296.0/10program works but doesn't allow too much
5.0
R. Leanizbarrutia291.5/5none of programs work (fibon is entirely wrong)
212/10the program doesn't work
7.5
T. Maduaka29 1.7/5two programs need just small corrections to be run;
2.0/10the program is very poor and doesn't work
7.5
S. Martin294.0/5all programs are copies, but couldn't check properly(see Raucher)
2810/10by far exceeds the standard; saved in H:/Teach
9.0
K. Moore225.0/5wrongly said of the last item in the series (not required)
28 7.0/10a close copy of Edwards'; no use of array, errors (claimed no rel.)
6.0
A. Murphy155.0/5no comments
279/10includes all (my suggestions + standard Boaman's/Lea setting)
7.0
R. Nartey293.5/5the series not correct, though the idea is nice; some flaws in others
221.0/10the task has not been understood; nothing is done
-
P. Obi294.4/5wrong names of programs
283.0/10a copy of poor version of U.Onwugbufo
2.5
I. Obianyo295.0/5no comments
287.5/10A copy of H.Hubrecht
7.5
K. Omadoye293.5/5the series is very much wrong
-
8.0
E. Onuoha292.5/5copy of F. Sarkodee's; one not correct
246.0/10 with a constructor and double menue, copy of Sarcodee
9/10
U. Onwugbufo295.0/5prints all partial sums in the series
276.5/10Done with my help in a reduced fashion
7.5/10
N. Pandya295.0/5if/else is one structure
-
6.0
A. Pasic295.0/5no comments
279.5/10allowing the user to select one seat and with a password
8.5
M.PelleiLaVecchi295.0/5strange idea of a negative radius
296.0/10program works, just doesn't do much
5.0
D. Pejovic293.0/5one program copied wrong and cannot work
283.5/10no understanding of methods
8.5
R. Raucher2/34.4/5professional language; series' loop is not correctly
defined -probably copied from Martin's , input in 3 doesn't work
3/10late, program doesn’t work
8.5
A. Reinolds294.8/5neatly done, though else is missed
275/10resembles the others; no arrays
5.0
F. Sarcodee293.5/5
284.0/10straight copy of Onuoha's very good program (later)
9.0
D. Sayiner295.0/5the series nicely calculated
289/10self-made code
7.5
S. Tamang2/31.0/5copy of Zapluuzha's
284.2/10a copy of I.Obianyo that is a copy of H.Hubrecht
6.5
T. Tang294.7/5the circumference is omitted
3.5/10copy of Okeneme, Walia, Boaman, Zizzi
7.5
A. Thomas 294.2/5 there must be alternating minus in the last problem
4.5/10
7.0
G. Tomlinson294.9/5a class is not on the disc, some junk files are instead
-
6.0
S. Walia295.0/5no comments
274.5coincides with Boaman, Okeneme + different screens
7.0
A.Zaplluzha255.0/5some calculations are nice
249.0/10big program; no review of customer-based activity
7.5
G. Zizzi295.0/5shouldn’t print anything without comment
27 4.5/10much resembles that of Boaman, no methods used though
7.0
______
Turned in next week:
W. Ahadze021.6/5Copied from A. Bakre, one is missed
-
5.0
J. Moreland033.8/5two java files saved with lower case letter
286/10my program is imitated
6.5
H. Wiggins024.2/5good work reduced because late
12/44/10copy of bus program, late, more-less copy of Moreland
6.0
P. Kanabahita063.5/5fibonacci with integers, if/else problem, though fresh ideas
245/10arrays not understood
4.0
B. Janagan064/5good work
3.46/10good options, but don't work; late
9.0
E.Ainsworth-Lindsay093.0/5same as Kanabahita, especially lock
3/51.5/10a copy of H.Wiggins
7.0
S. Okeneme103.8/5well done
3.0/10Coincides with E. Boaman, S. Walia
3.0
J. Raveendran20/42.5/5doesn't know how key in data
5/10late, tooo professional
1.5
______
Only second assignment:
V. Adeagbo282/10cannot work; a (reverse) copy of Aderupekun
1.0
B. Adenipekun282/10the program is incorrect and embryonic
6.0