Anti-Christ, Sodomite San Francisco Federal Judge Vaughn Walker is

Republican President George H.W. Bush appointee

Republican President George H.W. Bush - former CFR-director, former Trilateral Commission member, Skull and Bones member, former VP for Ronald Reagan, Mr. "New World Order"

of Gulf War I days (1990-1991).

"Walker, who was nominated to serve as a U.S. District Court judge by President George H.W. Bush in 1989, is one of only three openly gay [[CCL: sic - sodomite] federal judges."

"While his ruling affects only California, the appeal will go to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over nine Western states. The outcome there eventually could force the U.S. Supreme Court to confront the question of whether gays have a constitutional right to wed."

"This ruling, if allowed to stand, threatens not only Prop 8 in California but the laws in 45 other states that define marriage as one man and one woman," said Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage, which helped fund the 2008 campaign that led to the ban's passage."

"Currently, same-sex couples can legally wed [CCL: sic - sodomitically couple] only in Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire and Washington, D.C."

www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/05/appeal-ruling-delay-gay-weddings-california/

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

So when are Christians and patriots in America going to start supporting, voting for, and electing those who speak out against the New World Order, instead of following the false leadership of the Romanist/Ecumenical "conservative" Establishment organizations like Focus on the Family, National Right to Life, Christian Coalition, et al., and being brainwashed into voting for

"the lesser-of-two-evils" because Mr./Mrs. "Lesser-of-Two-Evils" can "win" and not the Christian, constitutionalist, pro-life candidate, because "they can't win, they're not electable" - STOP listening

to the voices of "unbelief" from the liars at National Right to Life, et al. and start voting for principled,

Christian, constitutionalist, pro-life men for office, and just maybe, God will grant us favor to see some of them elected !

BY THE WAY - You probably won't hear this from the Establishment "conservative" talking heads, like serial-divorcee Rush Limbaugh (who paid sodomite Elton John to perform at his recent fourth marriage), or Republican Establishment shill, Romanist Sean Hannity (who has had at least four CFR-members on his programs - Thompson, McCain, Gingrich, & Cheney), but, THE CONGRESS HAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO STRIP, REMOVE APPELLATE JURISDICTION FROM THE SUPREME COURT ON THE SODOMY ISSUE, THE ABORTION ISSUE, THE PRAYER and TEN COMMANDMENTS ISSUES - BY INVOKING SUCH POWER UNDER ARTICLE III., SECTION 2. OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. AND THE

LOWER FEDERAL COURTS (I.E., US. DISTRICT COURTS AND CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS) ARE ENTIRELY CREATIONS OF ACTS OF CONGRESS, SO THE U.S. CONGRESS CAN DETERMINE WHETHER THESE LOWER FEDERAL COURTS ARE EVEN ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE, LET ALONE WHAT THEIR JURISDICTION IS ! ).

CONGRESS CAN FIX THIS PRO-SODOMITE, ANTI-CHRIST DECISION FROM A BUSH, SR.-APPOINTED FEDERAL JUDGE - BUT WHEN ARE CHRISTIANS AND PATRIOTS GOING TO START ELECTING CHRISTIAN CONSTITUTIONALIST MEN WHO WILL VOTE FOR SUCH MEASURES WHEN ELECTED TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS ? WE HAVE A VOTE

COMING UP IN LESS THAN THREE MONTHS, ON NOVEMBER 2, 2010 - HOW MANY OF THE CANDIDATES ARE WILLING TO EMPLOY THEIR ARTICLE III. SECTION 2. POWER TO STOP THE ANTI-CHRIST, PRO-SODOMITE, PRO-ABORTION, ANTI-SOVEREIGNTY AGENDA ? OR, WILL WE CONTINUE TO PERISH AS A NATION, FOR LACK OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD (Hosea 4:6) AND LACK OF VISION (REVELATION) (Proverb 29:18) ? [ And BTW, neither is the answer following the lead on 8/28 in Washington, DC of Mormon Glenn Beck, or his ecumenical friends like Sarah Palin, David Barton, et al ! ].

Steve Lefemine

August 5, 2010

PS. Here is South Carolina, we have elected New World Order puppets like Shriner, Mason Congressman "CAFTA-2005" Joe Wilson (who was honored at a World Masonic Conference

May 10, 2008), and pro-Sotomayor, pro-Kagan, pro-amnesty-for-illegal-aliens, Senator Lindsey Graham. Thankfully, the State of South Carolina seems to be waking up, and Senator

"Grahamnesty" has just this week been formally rebuked by the Greenville County Republican Party and Tea Party organizations. (The Times Examiner, August 4, 2010, Greenville, SC).

QUEERLY BELOVED

WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Federal judge nixes 'gay'-marriage ban

Rules California voters can't define nuptials as between 1 man, 1 woman

--WND

www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=187769

Posted: August 04, 2010

A federal judge in California who is reported to be living a homosexual lifestyle today nixed the state's "gay"-marriage ban,

ruling that voters cannot define in their own state constitution that marriage is between one man and one woman only.

continued...

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:22:02 -0600

Subject: Homosexual San Fran Judge's ruling that limiting marriage to 1 man-1 woman to be "unconstitutional" is

totally absurd and should be ignored...

From: Gregg Jackson <>

Homosexual activist judge’s opinion, that CA Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as one man one woman as “unconstitutional,” is utterly absurd and should be ignored!

Today, homosexual activist San Francisco U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker (George H.W. Bush appointee)

issued an opinion that Prop 8, amended into law by California Voters in 2008, which defines marriage as limited to one man-one woman, is “unconstitutional.”

Here we go again.

Most headlines cite how Judge Walker “struck down” the so-called “gay marriage ban.”

For starters, judges can’t “strike down” any law whether it be a statute or constitutional amendment such as Prop 8. And it is a shame that so many “conservative” lawyers continue to parrot this toxic liberal lie. Judges may hear individual

cases and rule on them as long as they have jurisdiction. But judges don’t possess any legislative authority. Period!

rest here: http://greggjackson.com/blog/?p=508

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Corrected and Revised, August 12, 2010