March 2004doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/366r0

IEEE P802.11
Wireless LANs

802.11r Comments From 802.21 on PAR and 5 Criteria and Resolutions

Date:March 17, 2004

Author:Clint Chaplin
Symbol Technologies, Inc.
6480 Via Del Oro
San Jose, CA 95119-1208
Phone: +1-408-528-2766
e-Mail:

Abstract

Comments on proposed PAR (11-03-0771-05-frfh-possible-par) and 5 Criteria (11-03-0772-04-frfh-possible-5-criteria) from 802.21 and motions

Comments from 802.21

Comment #1 - Scope

Suggest changing the paragraph to be ‘scope like’ by changing the initial word to “
”Enhancements to the”

Motion: replace the first word “Enhance” in section 12 of 11-03-0771-05-frfh-possible-par.doc with “Enhancements to the”.

Moved: Ivan Reed/Keith Amann

Vote: Unanimous Consent

Comment #2 - Scope

The interpretation of the term roam varies widely based on context. ‘BSS Transition’ has defined meaning in 802.11. Substitute roam with BSS transition.

Motion: replace the term “roam” in section 12 of 11-03-0771-05-frfh-possible-par.doc with “BSS transition”, and delete the word “roaming” from the same section.

Moved: Bob Love/Keith Amann

Vote: 36-1-1

Scope:

Enhancements to the 802.11 Medium Access Control (MAC) layer to minimize or eliminate the amount of time data connectivity between the STA and the DS is absent during a bss transition, limited to the state necessary for the operation of the MAC. This PAR will apply only to the STA-AP state within the same ESS, and will not apply to the IBSS case. Security must not be decreased as a result of the enhancement. Timing criteria and timing conditions will be defined by the Task Group.

Comment #3

In order to clarify the efforts of the new Task Group and align those efforts with 802.21 it is suggested that the naming of the new 802.11 Task Group be either:

- Fast BSS-Transitionor

- Fast Inter-BSS-Transition

Motion: replace “Fast Roaming” in the title in Section 4 of 11-03-0771-05-frfh-possible-par.doc with “Fast BSS-Transition”

Moved: Bob Love/Nancy Cam-Winget

Vote: 41-0-4

Comment #4

The purpose statement appear to be a problem statement

This should be re-expressed as a purpose statement.

“To improve the user experience during BSS transitions within 802.11 ESSs and to support real time constraints imposed by applications such as VoIP.”

And move the existing purpose text to the explanatory notes section.

Motion: In 11-03-0771-05-frfh-possible-par.doc move the text that currently exists in section 13 to section 18, change “roam” and “roaming” to “BSS transition” and add headers to read:

Section 13:

A new set of WLAN applications are more sensitive to even momentary loss of connectivity during BSS transition (e.g. VoIP). With increasing amounts of state being needed before connectivity is allowed as amendments are made to the 802.11 standard, the time taken to complete a BSS transition is increasing while next generation applications demand decreased BSS transition time.

Section 12:

The scope of modifications is during the STA transfer from one AP to another (BSS transition). Determination of the need for a BSS transition, selection of which AP to BSS transition to (with the exception of the advertisement of the availability of fast BSS transition services to the STA), and determination of when to BSS transition are all outside the scope of this project.

As a design criteria, the proposed mechanism must accomplish this goal without compromizing security or existing Station services

And add the following text to section 13 to replace the moved text:

“To improve BSS transitions within 802.11 ESSs and to support real time constraints imposed by applications such as VoIP.”

Moved: Ivan Reid/Bob Love

Vote: 37-0-3

Submissionpage 1Clint Chaplin, FR SG Chair