Constraint Families

1  Grimshaw 1998 Constraints on Constraints listed six types of common constraint used in both phonology and syntax

Faithfulness constraints

We have already discussed these

Mapping constraints

Certain elements have to go in certain positions

OpSpec (operators must be in specifier positions)
used by Grimshaw to account for wh-movement

Structure constraints

structural positions must be filled by (certain) elements

ObHd
used by Grimshaw to account for inversion
CP specifier position necessary to accommodate wh-element (OpSpec)
CP necessary because of X-bar theory
inversion necessary because of ObHd

Economy constraints

processes and representations should be minimised

Stay (don’t move)
used by Grimshaw to account for difference between languages with wh-movement and those without
*Struc (don’t have unnecessary structure)
Used by Grimshaw to explain why there is no inversion in non-interrogatives – CP unnecessary so not present

Markedness constraint

Don’t realise certain input elements

*Dat, *Acc, *Nom (Woolford 2000) account of why themes are in nominative when subject goes missing

Alignment constraints

First Ideas (phonology)

Generalised Alignment (McCarthy and Prince 1993)
Alignment constraints consist of 5 elements
two categories which are to be aligned = ACat1, ACat2
two edges of these categories which are involved = Edge1, Edge2
the category which is used to count violations in case of misalignment = SCat

ALIGN (F, L, ω, L, σ): The left edge of every foot coincides with the left edge of some prosodic word. Assess a violation mark for each syllable intervening between misaligned edges

This allows alignments such as:

[( x x x x ... = left edge of [...] aligned to left edge of (...)

... x x x )] = right edge of [...] aligned to right edge of (...)

... x)[x ... = left edge of [...] aligned to right edge of (...)

...x](x... = right edge of [...] aligned to left edge of (...)

The first two involve one category inside the other and hence entails a hierarchical structure. The second two involve precedence/subsequence and adjacency between two categories and hence entails linear ordering of the two categories.

Alignment in Syntax

Grimshaw 2001 X-bar structures
HdLft, SpecLft, CompLft
used to account for word orders in X-bar structures
Choi 2000 Discourse features
Prom precedes –Prom,
+New precedes =New,
Sub precedes non-subj,
non-subjects are ordered opposite to thematic hierarchy