Yleiskommentteja Konetekniikan Arviointiprosessista

Evaluation of Chemistry Research in Finland

Evaluation Form

The Form consists of two parts:

Part I. Resources and research output of the Unit

Part II. The Unit’s self-assessment

Part I: Selected parts of the information provided by the Unit will be published in the evaluation report. Part II: The information provided by the Unit will be used for evaluation purposes only and will not be published. No data concerning individual researchers will be published; the evaluation will not assess persons but the unit as a whole.

PART I. RESOURCES AND RESEARCH OUTPUT

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Contact information

B. The unit’s research profile within the field of evaluation

Estimate the percentage that chemistry research represents from all research done in your unit.

Estimate the following chemistry subfield percentages respective to your all chemistry research (sum=100%).

Table 1.1

Research

%

2. RESOURCES

A1. Personnel

Include personnel funded through the university to which the unit belongs, or through some other funding source.

Include only those graduate students that have carried out their work in the unit.

Visiting research staff is not included here but in section A2 below (Tables 2.4. and 2.5.).

Calculate Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for the evaluation period: (Total person months for the category) /12/(5 years).

Table 2.1

Other graduated academic staff

List the professors, other senior researchers and postdoctoral researchers for the evaluation period

Table 2.2

Indicate which percentage of the research is carried out by postgraduates and which by PhDs.

Estimate also the percentage of the research funding used to basic and applied research.

Table 2.3

A2. Visiting researchers

Include visiting researchers when the funding for the visit has been arranged through the activity of your unit (e.g. Academy of Finland, Tekes, EU funding).

Table 2.4

Person months

List the visiting professors, visiting senior researchers and visiting postdoctoral researchers here. The postgraduate students will be listed in section 4E, Visits to the Unit, Table 4.7.

Table 2.5

B. Funding

Table 2.6

3. RESEARCH OUTPUT

A. Numbers of scientific publications and other outputs

Table 3.1

B. Degrees

Table 3.2

List of doctoral dissertations in 2005-2009.

Table 3.3

4. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION

Throughout this section, do not use abbreviations for institutes and universities but spell them out. Target the collaboration and visits to the period of evaluation (2005-2009).

More detailed content of the collaboration and important project consortia can be described in Part II: Collaboration.

A. Extent of collaboration

For your yearly production of refereed journal publications, give the percentages for co-authoring partners outside your unit.

Table 4.1

B. National collaboration

List your most important national collaborations. The collaborating organisation may also be from the same university or research institute, or industrial. The type of collaboration may be e.g. joint projects, personal collaboration, research mobility, networking.

The results may be e.g.:

• Refereed scientific publications
• Other publications
• Patents or other outputs
• Educational, MSc and PhD theses
• Facilities, instrumentation
• Prototypes, methodologies
• Networks

Table 4.2

*Collaborators: KR = Kari Rissanen, EK = Erkki Kolehmainen, MN = Maija Nissinen, PP = Petri Pihko, TL = Tanja Lahtinen, SI = Satu Ikonen, JP = Jaakko Paasivirta

C. International collaboration

List your most important international collaborations with the same criteria as in Section 4.B.

Table 4.3

*Collaborators: KR = Kari Rissanen, EK = Erkki Kolehmainen, MN = Maija Nissinen, PP = Petri Pihko, TL = Tanja Lahtinen, SI = Satu Ikonen, JP = Jaakko Paasivirta