Regional Comprehensive Community Services

Consumer-Centered Assessment Workshop and Peer Discussion

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2016

Wautoma, Wisconsin

Summary of 18Workshop Evaluations(18 people attended)
1. What is your overall evaluation of the workshop?
1- Poor / 2 - Below
Average / 3 - Average / 4 - Above
Average / 5 - Excellent
Number of Responses: / 0 / 0 / 4 (22%) / 9 (50%) / 5 (28%)
Average Score: / 4.1
2. Was the workshop relevant to your needs?
Yes / No / Somewhat
Number of Responses: / 16 (89%) / 0 / 2 (11%)

3. What aspect or topic did you find the most helpful?

  • (6) Peer to peer conversation / discussion

  • (3) Group activities. Selected comment:
  • Enjoyed the activities to keep the group engaged and work through issues all counties are having.

  • (2) CCS assessment / assessment summary examples

  • Issues basket. What other are doing. What has worked and what hasn't

  • Regional working on documents

  • Updating of assessment

  • The slides, working as a team, and working individually.

  • New to the program so all was good to know.

  • Good overview

  • The defining of roles.

  • I found the topic of abbreviated assessment helpful.

  • Practical things

  • Realizing all in the group have a lot of the same questions.

  • All of it.

4. What would you suggest to improve the workshop?

  • (2) longer workshop (one mentioned ½ day, another mentioned 2 days)

  • (2) better clarification / answers on some things

  • More examples of how things should look

  • Supervisors from all counties attend

  • More issue focused, less broad

  • It was great

  • More breaks

  • Enjoyed hearing region comments.

  • State representative to fix all of it 

  • A better training room. Tables were not set in a way to see presenters. Chairs uncomfortable. Perhaps streamline info to stay on track.

  • Only briefly talk about background/roles to allow more time for discussion of the actual assessment and issues facilitators are having difficulty with.

  • I don't know

5. Please evaluate the presenter(s) using a scale of 1-5.

Number of Responses
1 - Poor / 2 - Below
Average / 3 - Average / 4 - Above
Average / 5 - Excellent / Average Score
Presenters’ knowledge of material / 0 / 0 / 4 (22%) / 9 (50%) / 5 (28%) / 4.2
Relevance of material content / 0 / 0 / 2 (11%) / 9 (50%) / 6 (33%) / 4.3
Presentation/ organization / 0 / 0 / 2 (11%) / 9 (50%) / 6 (33%) / 4.2

6. Please add any additional comments/suggestions you might have:

  • Good agenda. Communicating follow-up. Sharing ideas across the region.

  • A gathering of same individuals soon to finalize assessment.

  • Thank you for providing this workshop!

  • More time with more breaks

  • Love regional coordination of operations and processes.

  • Great job Lori.

  • Likes use of visuals, boards, screen, etc. All speakers were clear and appeared comfortable speaking. Thank you for keeping scheduled break and to end on time.

1