Review of Statement of Qualifications
Name of Applicant: ______Reviewer’s Name: ______Date of Review: ______
Is the proposal at least somewhat responsive to the Study Commission’s RFP? (Circle either "yes" or "no") / Yes (if "yes", then continue review of the application) / No (if "no", discontinue review of application)Review the application taking into consideration the following:
1 / Relevance of project staffs' previous work to proposed work / 0 (Low) pts. - 20 (High) pts.2 / Project staff qualifications (e.g., education) / 0 (Low) pts. - 20 (High) pts.
3 / Reasonableness of time period proposed to complete the project / 0 (Low) pts. - 10 (High) pts.
4 / Approach to organizing and managing the project / 0 (Low) pts. - 5 (High) pts.
5 / Specific and usable deliverables / 0 (Low) pts. - 5 (High) pts.
6 / Progress monitoring procedures / 0 (Low) pts. - 5 (High) pts.
7 / Are capable writing abilities demonstrated in application? / 0 (Low) pts. - 5 (High) pts.
8 / The proposal is responsive to the RFP for: (select one of either 1, 2, 4 or 5 points) / A few aspects - 1 pts.
Some aspects - 2 pts.
Most of the aspects - 4 pts.
All of the aspects - 5 pts.
9 / Your assessment of proposer's ability to perform this research and complete the project / 0 (Low) pts. - 25 (High) pts.
Total Points
H:\MFULLER DATA\REGION C STUDY COMMISSION\POSSIBLE SCORE SHEET.DOC