TREATMENT TOOLS AND EFFECTIVENESS
Ackerman, S.J. & Hilsenroth,M.J. (2003). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting on the therapeutic alliance.Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1-33.
DiFazio, R., Abracen,J., & Looman, J. (2001). Group versus individual treatment of sex offenders: A comparison. Forum on Corrections Research, 13, 56-59.
Dishion, T.J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999) When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755-764.
Fernandez, Y.M. (Ed.)(2002). In their shoes: Examining the issue of empathy and its place in the treatment of offenders. Oklahoma City, OK: Wood 'N’ Barnes Publishing.
Frost, A. (2004). Therapeutic engagement styles in child sex offenders in a group treatment program: A grounded theory study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and treatment, 16, 191-208
Frost, A., Daniels, K. Hudson, S.M. (2006). Disclosure strategies among sex offenders: A model for understanding the engagement process in group work. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 12, No. 3,227-244
Gannon, T., King, T., Miles, H., Lockerbie, L., & Willis, G. M. (2011). Good lives sexual offender treatment for mentally disordered offenders. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 13, 153-168.
Hanson, R.K., Bourgon, G. Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-891.
Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (2002). First report of the Collaborative Outcome Data Project on the effectiveness of treatment for sex offenders.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
Harkins, L., Flak, V. E., & Beech, A. (in press). Evaluation of a community-based sex offender treatment program using a Good Lives Model approach. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.
Levenson, J.S., & Macgowan, M.J. (2004). Engagement, denial, and treatment progress among sex offenders in group therapy. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 49-63.
Lovins, B., Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E. (2009). Applying the risk principle to sex offenders: Can some treatment make them worse? Prison Journal, 89, 344-357.
Magnus. J. Seng, Loretta J. Stalans, PaulYarnold, and James Swartz; AnImplementation Evaluation of the Specialized Sex Offender Projects in DuPage, Lake and Winnebago Counties; Prepared for the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority; June 2000
Marshall, W.L., Thornton, D., Marshall, L.E., Fernandez, Y.M., & Mann, R. (2001).
Treatment of sexual offenders who are in categorical denial: A pilot project. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 205 215.
Marshall, W.L. (2005). Therapist style in sexual offender treatment: Influence on indices of change. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 17(2), 109-116.
Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., Serran, G. A. & Fernandez, Y. M. (2006).Treating sexual offenders: An integrated approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Marshall, W. L., Serran, G. A., Fernandez, Y. M., Mulloy, R., Mann, R. E., & Thornton, D. (2003). Therapist characteristics in the treatment of sexual offenders: Tentative data on their relationship with indices of behaviour change. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 9, 25-30.
Marshall, W. L., Serran, G. A., Moulden, H., Mulloy, R., Fernandez, Y. M., Mann, R. E., & Thornton, D. (2002). Therapist features in sexual offender treatment: Their reliable identification and influence on behaviour change. Clinical Psychological and Psychotherapy, 9, 395-405.
Schlank, A.M., & Shaw, T (1996).Treating sexual offenders who deny their guilt: A pilot study. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 17-23.
Seto, M. C., Marques, J. K., Harris, G. T., Chaffin, M., Lalumière, M. L., Miner, M. H., Berliner, L., Rice, M. E., Lieb, R., & Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Good science and progress in sex offender treatment are intertwined: A response to Marshall and Marshall (2007). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 247-255.
Simons, D. A., McCullar, B., & Tyler, C. (2006). Evaluation of the Good Lives Model approach to treatment planning. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers Research and Treatment Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
Ware, J., Mann, R.E., & Wakeling, H.C. (2009).Group versus individual treatment: What is the best modality for treating sexual offenders?
Wilson, R.J., & Yates, P.M. (2009). Effective interventions and the Good Lives Model: Maximizing treatment gains for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 157-161.