#053-TTC-1091 --

DOCKET NO. 053-TTC-1091

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, + BEFORE THE STATE

DIVISION OF TEACHER RECORDS +

+

V. + COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION

+

JERRY RALPH COTTINGAME +

+ THE STATE OF TEXAS

DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Statement of the Case

Petitioner, the Division of Teacher Records for the

Texas Education Agency, filed this action on October 7,

1991, requesting that Respondent's teaching credentials be

sanctioned due to conduct rendering Respondent unworthy to

instruct the youth of this state. Subsequently, this matter

was set for hearing on January 16, 1992, before Hearing

Officer Debra Ravel. Hearing Officer Maggie H. Montelongo

was assigned to replace Debra Ravel on January 8, 1992, and

the hearing was rescheduled to January 17, 1992, at the

parties' request.

Petitioner appeared through its counsel, Mr. Terry

Johnson, Attorney at Law from Austin, Texas. Respondent

appeared with his legal representative, Mr. Daniel Ortiz,

Attorney at Law from Arlington, Texas.

At hearing, the parties submitted stipulated evidence

and agreed upon the occurrence of events. Based on the

stipulated evidence submitted for consideration and the

agreement reached by the parties, Hearing Officer Montelongo

recommended on January 22, 1992, that Petitioner's request

be granted. No exceptions were filed. The Commissioner of

Education did not consent to the agreed suspension of

Respondent's certificate and Respondent's subsequent motion

for rehearing was granted. A rehearing was scheduled and

held on July 15, 1992, before Hearing Officer Montelongo,

who took evidence from the parties and forwarded the record

to the State Commissioner of Education.

Findings of Fact

After due consideration of the evidence and matters

officially noticed, in my capacity as State Commissioner of

Education, I make the following Findings of Fact:

1. Respondent Cottingame moved to disqualify the

State Commissioner of Education and Hearing Officer Maggie

H. Montelongo from this action on July 14, 1992. On July

15, 1992, Joan Howard Allen, Director of Hearings and

Appeals, took evidence and argument on Respondent's motion

to disqualify and denied said motion for untimely filing.

(Record; Reh. TR. 15).

2. Respondent is the holder of Texas Teacher

Certificate No. XXX-XX-XXXX. (Stipulated).

3. On or about March 19, 1991, Respondent did

knowingly engage in an act of sexual contact by touching the

genitals through the clothing of Officer Tourangeau in a

public bathroom in Richardson Square, 501 South Plano Road,

Richardson, Texas. (P. Exs. 5, 6, 7; Stipulated; Reh. TR.

75).

4. On or about June 10, 1991, Respondent did sign a

waiver of trial by jury and pled nolo contendere to the

charge of public lewdness in County Criminal Court No. 10 of

Dallas County, Texas, in Cause No. MA91-36173-L. (P. Ex. 1;

Stipulated).

5. On or about June 10, 1991, Respondent was adjudged

guilty in Cause No. MA91-36173-L on the charge of public

lewdness and assessed punishment of 365 days confinement in

the Dallas County Jail, along with a fine of $250.00 and all

court costs incurred. The verdict and finding of guilty was

probated by the court for a period of one year from June 10,

1991. (P. Ex. 1; Stipulated).

6. The act complained of took place in a public

bathroom and Officer Tourangeau states that several children

utilized the facility while he and Respondent washed and

dried their hands, however no children were present when

Respondent touched Tourangeau's genitals. (Reh TR. 35, 40).

There is no evidence that children witnessed or were aware

of the conduct that transpired between Respondent and

Officer Tourangeau. Respondent's sexual contact with

Officer Tourangeau did not involve children. (Record; TR.

13; Stipulated).

At the time Respondent placed his hand on Tourangeau's

genitals, the men were standing in the doorway of the

entrance. (Reh. TR. 42).

7. March 19, 1991, was a Tuesday. It was the week of

spring break for Richardson ISD, thus explaining the

presence of the children in the public bathroom at the time

in question. (Reh. TR. 42).

8. Respondent has been undergoing treatment and

counseling for depression, anxiety and sexual compulsivity

at the Center for Sexual Issues at the CPC Millwood Hospital

since at least June 24, 1991, and has successfully completed

the first phase of a two year program. (P. Ex. 2; R. Ex. 1;

Stipulated).

9. According to Andre Corley, Clinical Director of the

Diamond Mountain Center at CPC Millwood Hospital,

Respondent's psychosexual dysfunction is a sexual compulsive

disorder dealing with adult sexual behavior. (R. Ex. 1).

10. Corley attests to Respondent's worthiness to

continue in the teaching profession without risk or danger

to the children he would be working with in the classroom.

(R. Ex. 1).

11. Respondent was on career ladder level two from

1984 through 1988. (R. Ex. 1; Reh. TR. 69).

12. For the 1987-88 school year, Respondent received a

performance rating of "Clearly Outstanding". (R. Ex. 1).

13. Respondent's performance appraisals ranged from

"exceeds expectations" to "clearly outstanding". (R. Ex.

1).

14. Respondent submitted his resignation from

Richardson I.S.D. by letter dated August 19, 1991, (R. Ex.

1).

15. By letter dated August 20, 1991, Richardson I.S.D.

accepted Respondent's resignation from employment. (R. Ex.

1).

16. Respondent is currently employed with B. Dalton

Booksellers part time. (Reh. TR. 58).

17. Respondent married in 1964 and divorced December

2, 1991. (Reh. TR. 61).

18. During his tenure at Richardson ISD, Respondent

did not receive any type of reprimand.

19. Respondent was active in supervising speech

instructors from the University of North Texas, in helping

coach speech events for the academic decathlon for J.J.

Pierce High School and in presenting an in-service program

to the district for mainstreaming special education

students. (Reh. TR. 70; R. Ex. 1-F).

20. In 1976, Respondent was charged with public

lewdness, the same offense with which he was charged in

1991. (Reh. TR. 74).

Discussion

For the past year, Respondent has been in treatment at

the Center for Sexual Issues at CPC Millwood Hospital

attempting to assess the difference between sexual

frustration and poor judgment due to the homosexual

component of his sexuality versus sexual compulsivity. This

predicament arose from Respondent Cottingame's criminal

arrest for public lewdness in a public bathroom where he, in

effect, propositioned an undercover police officer in March

of 1991.

It is to be noted that Respondent's sexual contact

involved adult behavior and did not involve children at any

time. Behaviorally, Respondent's conduct was not any

different from someone who has been caught in a prostitution

sting. Additionally, although Petitioner was arrested in a

public restroom, his conduct was not executed in the

presence of any children.

However, a teacher's adjudication on criminal charges

of sexual conduct in an area to which children do have

access does prompt an examination into the issue of the

welfare and safety of the children with whom the teacher

will work. In this case, however, there is no evidence that

demonstrates Respondent Cottingame poses a risk to a child's

welfare if he is permitted to continue as an educator.

Although Cottingame's conduct is egregious, there is no

relationship developed between his crime and his capacity

and fitness to perform his teaching duties and to discharge

his responsibilities as an educator. Respondent has

exhibited a deficiency in judgment with respect to his

compulsive behavior; however, this lapsed judgment is not

directly related to his occupation. In sum, even after

rehearing, no medical, factual, or psychological reasons

have been presented to establish that Respondent poses a

risk to children.

In contrast, there is evidence that Respondent was a

clearly outstanding teacher who has respect for students and

performs quite well in the classroom. Moreover, it is the

professional opinion of Cottingame's clinical director, who

is charged with evaluating, counseling and treating

Respondent for his compulsivity, that Respondent is worthy

to instruct the youth of the state and poses no danger to

the students if allowed to continue as a teacher.

Corley, the clinical director, does concede that

Respondent Cottingame used poor judgment in his behavior;

however, it is Respondent's disorder that promotes this

poor exercise of judgment and Respondent has sought

treatment for this. Accordingly, after taking into

consideration the particular circumstances of this case, it

is my determination that the teaching credentials of

Respondent Jerry Ralph Cottingame be suspended for a period

of one year from the date of final decision in this action.

Conclusions of Law

After due consideration of the record, matters

officially noticed, and the foregoing Findings of Fact, in

my capacity as State Commissioner of Education, I make the

following Conclusions of Law:

1. The Commissioner of Education has jurisdiction over

this action pursuant to Tex. Educ. Code Ann. +13.046(a)(2).

2. Respondent's motion to disqualify is hereby denied.

3. There is no evidence to establish that Respondent

Cottingame is a risk to the children if permitted to

continue as an educator.

4. In this instance, there is insufficient evidence

to demonstrate any risk to children from Respondent's

conduct in question.

5. In this particular case, there is insufficient

evidence to establish that Respondent's arrest from the

police sting on solicitation of sex between adult males

bears any relationship to his occupation as an educator.

6. Respondent Jerry Ralph Cottingame, holder of Texas

Teacher Certificate No. XXX-XX-XXXX, has not been shown to

be unworthy to instruct the youth of this state at this

time; however, his exercise of poor judgment that resulted

in a violation of state law demonstrates a deficiency in the

mental qualities necessary to effectively carry out the

duties of the teaching profession. This justifies a

suspension of Respondent's teaching credentials for one

year.

7. Respondent's Texas Teacher Certificate No.

XXX-XX-XXXX is suspended for a period of one year from the

date of final decision in this matter. Said suspension is

to be noted on the face of Respondent Cottingame's

certificate.

8. The Texas Education Agency, Division of

Educational Personnel Records is ordered to prepare and

distribute appropriate notices notifying the public of the

suspension of Respondent's teacher certificate.

7. Petitioner's request for sanctions is granted.

O R D E R

After due consideration of the record, matters

officially noticed, and the foregoing Findings of Fact and

Conclusions of Law, in my capacity as State Commissioner of

Education, it is hereby

ORDERED that Respondent's Texas Teaching Certificate

No. XXX-XX-XXXX be, and is hereby, SUSPENDED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Division of Educational

Personnel Records prepare and distribute appropriate notices

notifying the public of the suspension of Respondent's Texas

Teacher Certificate No. XXX-XX-XXXX.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's request for

sanctions be, and is hereby, GRANTED.

SIGNED AND ISSUED this ___ day of ______,

1993.

______

LIONEL R. MENO

COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION