1

Telecommunications – Expense Management

CONTENTS

1.CONTEXT

1.1.Background

1.2.Purpose

1.3.Scope and application

1.4.Policy context

1.5.The ICT Services Catalogue

2.KEY PRINCIPLES

3.REQUIREMENTS

3.1.Telecommunications Expense Management (TEM) service

3.2.Requirements table

3.2.1 Requirements table

3.3.Elements of this standard

3.3.1.Required NSW business outcomes

3.3.2.Service Management

DOCUMENT CONTROL

APPENDIX A – DEFINITIONS

APPENDIX B – ABBREVIATIONS

APPENDIX C – REFERENCES

APPENDIX D – STANDARDS

Developing technical standards

Management and implementation

  1. CONTEXT

1.1.Background

This is a technical standard developed bythe NSW ICT Procurement and Technical Standards Working Group. The standard contains technical and functional requirements that agencies should consider when procuring mobility services.

By defining the necessary and common elements across agencies, the standard provides an opportunity to leverage the buying power of Government as a whole,improve procurement efficiency and increase interoperability.

1.2.Purpose

The purpose of this standard is to assist NSW Government agencies to develop, procure and implement telecommunications expense managements, as well as take full advantage of their benefits. This standard also helps agencies procure in a strategic manner that reflects the NSW Government’s priorities as outlined in the NSW Government ICT Strategy.

This standard details the issues that need to be considered so each agency can identify the available options that best suit their business requirements, helping agencies achieve value for money through cost savings and improved flexibility of service offerings.

1.3.Scope and application

This standard applies to all NSW Government departments, statutory bodies and shared service providers. It does not apply to state-ownedcorporations, but is recommended for their adoption.

For the purpose of this standard, Telecommunications Expense Management (TEM) servicesare defined as having the elements set out at section 3.1.

This standardsets out service definitions as minimum requirements that vendors must meet to be able to offer their services through the NSW ICT Services Catalogue. Agencies should consider any specific operational or regulatory factors that impact their requirements, and specific requirements they have in addition to those detailed in this standard.

1.4.Policy context

The NSW Government ICT Strategy and Digital + 2016 Final Update set out the Government’s plan to: build capability across the NSW public sector to deliver better, more customer-focused services that are available anywhere, anytime; and to derive increased value from the Government’s annual investment in ICT.

Developing whole of NSW Government ICT technical standards is a key initiative of the NSW Government ICT Strategy, driven by the ICT Procurement and Technical Standards Working Group. These standards leverage principles defined in the NSW Government ICT Strategy and the NSW Government Cloud Policy, and they support the NSW ICT Services Catalogue.

The standards set out service definitions as minimum requirements that vendors must meet to be able to offer their services through the NSW Services Catalogue. This helps achieve consistency across service offerings, emphasising a move to as a service sourcing strategies in line with the NSW Government ICT Strategy, and it signals government procurement priorities to industry.

Solutions should also assist agencies in their alignment with the NSW Government Enterprise Architecture(NSW GEA), which encompasses all aspects of enterprise architecture activity at the business, information, application and technology infrastructure layers. The NSW GEA is about providing direction and practical guidance to accelerate the development of agency EA capability and enabling a common, intra and inter agency approach to the design of digital government.

This standard should be applied along with existing NSW Government policies and guidance, including the NSW Digital Information Security Policy. More information on the process for the development of standards that populate the ICT Services Catalogue is at Appendix D – Standards.

1.5.The ICT Services Catalogue

This catalogue provides suppliers with a showcase for their products and services, and an opportunity to outline how their offerings meet or exceed standard government requirements. The standards, together with supplier service offerings, help to reduce red tape and duplication of effort by allowing suppliers to submit service details only once against the standards. The offerings are then available to all potential buyers, simplifying procurement processes for government agencies.

Implementing this category management approach embedscommonapproaches, technologies and systems to maintain currency, improve interoperability and provide better value ICT investment across NSW Government.

  1. KEY PRINCIPLES

The following key principles underpin this standard:

  • Fit for purpose: TEM solutionsshould meet agency business requirements, and provide sufficient bandwidth for current and future applications. An effective TEM solution should ensure that only appropriate and approved expenses are paid by agencies, and that applicable statutory, regulatory, financial and reporting requirement are met.
  • Facilitating as a service:TEM solutionsshould facilitate the agency transition to as a service, and ensure agency alignment with broader NSW ICT Strategy.
  • Value for money:TEM solutions should deliver value for money, in line with the investment principles set out in the NSW Government ICT Investment Policy and Guidelines.
  • Fiduciary Responsibility: Effective TEM solution’s should cover a sound auditable process , including tendering, requisitions , purchase orders, goods receipt and payment .There are should be various methods of payment such as cash, cheque, corporate card, petty cash and electronic funds transfer. Each of these payment methods have differing risks, costs and benefits, which Agency employees must be well informed or educated.
  • Timely and Accurate: An effective TEM solution for agencies should ensure expenses are : promptly and accurately identified , approved by the authorised Agency delegate with appropriate authority, incurred in the name of the Agency/ entity for lawful and legitimate purposes only.
  • Contestability: An effective TEM solution must be subject to competitive and ethical procurement arrangement and processes.
  • Reporting and Monitoring: An effective TEM solution must provide accurate expense record and reporting in accordance with prescribed requirement .

Management should also implement monitoring controls to highlight or identify irregularities in the type or patterns of expenditure incurred by the Agency, for example, ongoing data analysis to identify unusual transactions or trends for follow up.

  1. REQUIREMENTS

3.1. Telecommunications Expense Management(TEM) service

A TEM solution comprises a service that assists an Agency better understand its Telecommunications Agreements by:

  • ensuring services provided are ‘fit for purpose’;
  • currently required/valid; and
  • makes recommendations for improvements where appropriate.

Additionally services may provide Agencies with advice on telecommunications strategy and procurement requirements.

3.2. Requirements table

Thefollowing table sets out the recommended business and technical requirements for NSW Government. It provides a consistent approach for all NSW Government agencies regardless of their size. Explanations for each element of table are provided at section 3.3.

 / Required
 / Optional, but beneficial

1

Telecommunications – Expense Management

3.2.1 Requirements table

‘Use cases’ for Telecommunications – Expense Management(TEM) that are anticipated in agencies are included in the table below. The corresponding requirement sections of this standard are markedin the columns.

Use Case / Scenario / Telecommunications Expense Management (TEM) / Service Management
Auditing and Optimisation / Invoice Verification / Dash board / Benchmarking / Telecommunications Analytics / Strategy Development / Go to market engagements / Proposal Evaluations / Agency financial system integration / Cloud compliant hosting facility / NSW Government Data Centre / Service level management / Multi-service broker provision
Telecommunications Expense Management (Silver Level Service) /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  / 
Telecommunications Expense Management (Gold Level Service) /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  /  / 

1

Telecommunications – Expense Management

3.3. Elements of this standard

3.3.1.Required NSW business outcomes

Auditing and Optimisation

TEM solutions should allow for the review of historical data for inconsistencies and identify opportunities for future improvement of telecommunications expenditure at any time of a contract lifecycle to align all services to its lowest cost based on usage profile. Solutions need to demonstrate their ability to do this across multiple vendors’ solutions.All responses to market engagements must be able to demonstrate how their solution meets these requirements.

Invoice Verification

Solution providers will review Agency telecommunications invoices and verify them for correctness including ensuring the underlying service exists. Where there is concern about the need/usage of the service, these are to be raised with the Agency and joint or agreed action taken to resolve services that are no longer required/‘fit for purpose’. All responses to market engagements must be able to demonstrate how their solution meets these requirements and the options available to verify invoices accordingly.

Dash board

Provision of periodic (eg monthly) key performance indicators as agreed between the parties that could include spend, spend analysis, number of services, usage of services, services being used below expected levels (possible discontinuation opportunities), international roaming etc. Optionally this could include providing information (in relevant file format or other electronic means) to a central point for whole of Government comparison. All responses to market engagements must be able to demonstrate how their solution meets these requirements and the options available for including in any dash board.

Benchmarking

Determine the best level of market pricing offered by incumbent or proposed supplier(s) and negotiation pricing points. This should include provision of detailed and supported analysis that shows the relative position the agency current sits compared with peers for similar services consumed. All responses to market engagements must be able to demonstrate how their solution meets these requirements and the options available for use in benchmarking offers/options.

Telecommunications Analytics

Generate detailed statistics and information about current telecommunications usage and costs, to provide data driven analysis of how to reduce costs further. All responses to market engagements must be able to demonstrate how their solution meets these requirements and the options available for inclusion in telecommunication analytics.

Strategy Development

Solutions could include options to assist agencies in the development of telecommunications strategy. This could include provision of Asset Management and/or Asset Management Planning and recommendations on the cost benefit of retaining existing telecommunications infrastructure verse replacing it with alternatives. All responses to market engagements should describe how and to what extent their offering can assist agencies achieve this element.

Go to market engagements

Solutions could include options to assist agencies in the development of go-to-market engagements. All responses to market engagements should describe how and to what extent their offering can assist agencies achieve this element.

Proposal evaluation

Solutions could include options to assist agencies in the evaluation of proposals received. All responses to market engagements should describe how and to what extent their offering can assist agencies achieve this element.

Agency Financial System Integration

Solutions should be able to integrate with Agency financial systems to provide seamless information sharing across an agency. All responses to market engagements should identify what systems they can integrate with and to what extent integration is available.

3.3.2.Service Management

Cloud compliant hosting facility

Any relevant cloud services for the solution must be provisioned from a compliant hosting facility. Compliant hosting is defined as having the following attributes and/or capabilities:

  • The location of the hosting facility must be identified either by name and/or location (city and country) in any response.
  • The hosting location cannot be changed without first informing the agency concerned.
  • The service provider undertakes, maintains and provides access to SSAE 16 Service Organization Control (SOC) Type II reports (or equivalent) for the services and facilities in scope for the engagement.
  • The hosting facility must comply with minimum Tier 3, as defined by the Uptime Institute, ANSI TIA-942, or an equivalent industry standard.
  • The hosting facility must be certified against to the ISO 27001 standard; compliance with the following international standards is desirable:
  • ISO 9001
  • ISO 27002
  • ISO 20000-1:2011
  • ISO 14001

Other desirable certifications may include, but are not limited to:

  • PCI-DSS v3.0 or later
  • Australian Signals Directorate
  • ASIO-T4
  • Uptime Institute
  • CSA

Also consider contractual obligations relating to the service provider allowing security assessments and treatment of outcomes as agreed with the client.

If the hosting facilities changes to a location that is deemed unacceptable either to NSW Government or to the agency and/or loses attributes and/or capabilities identified above, the agency may need to consider termination of services.

NSW Government Data Centre

Any relevant services for the solution must be provisioned from one or both NSW Government Data Centre (GovDC). Depending on the service offering and agency requirements, it may be possible to ‘burst’ some elements of services to other location(s) subject to agreement with the commissioning agency.

Burst data centres must be deemed ‘compliant’. If the ‘burst’ data centre facilities change to a location that is deemed unacceptable either to NSW Government or to the agency, the agency may need to re-examine the ‘burst’ service or the full service.

Onshore/offshore management

All solution providers must be able to articulate where the connected service(s) and any remote support services will be provided from. For example, with a ‘follow the sun’ support model, the locations of each of their support sites around the globe need to be identified. Any changes to these need to be communicated to the customer agency promptly and if this causes issues, the agency has the right to cancel the service with appropriate notification.

Service level management

Agencies will retain ultimate responsibility for service level management in any solutions engagement, which would ordinarily be covered by a SLA. Agencies, service-brokers and solution providers need to agree all SLA reporting and other related activities as part of any transition-in process.

Multi-service broker provision

Any solution provider must work within the confines of a multi-service provider environment where either the agency or nominated provider will perform broker service provision. This will be defined as one provider being made accountable for the provision of all associated services, whether these are provided by the provider itself, or other third-party providers.

DOCUMENT CONTROL

Document history

Status: Released

Version: 1.0

Approved by: Executive Director, ICT Policy & Innovation

Approved on: 28 July 2016

Issued by: ICT Policy and Innovation

Contact: IDG Policy and Innovation, Department of Finance, Services & Innovation (DFSI)

Email:

Telephone: (02) 9372 7445

Review

This standard will be reviewed as required.

APPENDIX A –DEFINITIONS

Term / Definition

APPENDIX B – ABBREVIATIONS

AIIAAustralian Information Industry Association

AMQPAdvanced Message Queuing Protocol

APNAccess Point Names

ASCIIAmerican Standard Code for Information Interchange

ASDAustralian Security Directorate

ASIOAustralian Secret Intelligence Organisation

BCMBusiness Continuity Management

BLEBluetooth Low Energy

BYODBring Your Own Device

CMISContent Management Interoperability Services

CMSContent Management System

CSACanadian Standards Association

FTPFile Transfer Protocol

GovDCGovernment Data Centre

ICTInformation & Communication Technology

IoTInternet of Things

ISO/TCInternational Organization for Standardization / Technical Committee

ITInformation Technology

LDAPLightweight Directory Access Protocol

MQTTMessage Queuing Telemetry Transport

NFCNear Field Communications

OCROptical Character Recognition

OSOperating System

PCI-DSSPayment Card Industry – Data Security Standard

PoFPool of Funds

PTSProcurement & Technical Standards

QRQuick Response

SOAService Oriented Architecture

SOAPSimple Object Access Protocol

SSOSingle Sign On

APPENDIX C– REFERENCES

Agencies should have regard to the following statutes, NSW Government policies and standards:

  • AS/NZS ISO 31000 Risk management – Principles and guidelines
  • Electronic Transactions Act 2000
  • Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009
  • Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002
  • ISO 27031-2011Information technology – Security techniques – Guidelines for information and communication technology readiness for business continuity
  • ISO 27001 Information technology – Security techniques – Information security management systems – Requirements
  • NSW Government Digital Information Security Policy
  • NSW Government Open Data Policy
  • NSW Government Cloud Policy
  • NSW Government Standard for Data Quality Reporting
  • NSW Government ICT Strategy
  • NSW Government Implementation Update 2013-14
  • NSW Government Digital + 2016 Final Update
  • NSW Government Information Classification, Labelling and Handling Guidelines
  • NSW Government Investment Policy and Guidelines
  • NSW Procurement: Small and Medium Enterprises Policy Framework
  • Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998
  • Public Finance and Audit Act 1983
  • Public Interest Disclosures Act 1994
  • State Records Act 1998
  • TPP 09-05 - Internal Audit and Risk Management Policy for the NSW Public Sector

APPENDIX D – STANDARDS

Developing technical standards

Development of a standard begins with identifying the need for a new standard, which is followed by the development of the standard in consultation with the industry and experts groups, including the Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA).