SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m.

Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 EN BANC

Bailiff: Rebecca Tanglen

07SA101 (1 HOUR)

Petitioner-Appellee:
TOWN OF TELLURIDE,
v.
Respondents-Appellants:
SAN MIGUEL VALLEY CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation; BOOMERANG HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; ALLEY OOP HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; and CORDILLERA CORPORATION, a Utah corporation. / ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner-Appellee:
Leslie A. Fields
John R. Sperber
Faegre & Benson LLP
and
Gerald E. Dahl
Murray Dahl Kuechenmeister & Renaud LLP
For the Respondents-Appellants:
Thomas J. Ragonetti
Darrell G. Waas
Patricia C. Campbell
Mikaela V. Rivera
J. Thomas MacDonald
Otten, Johnson, Robinson, Neff & Ragonetti, P.C.
For Amicus Curiae Board of County Commissioners of the County of San Miguel, Colorado:
Steven J. Zwick
County Attorney
Rebeckah S. King
Assistant County Attorney
For Amicus Curiae Colorado Municipal League:
Erin E. Goff
For Amicus Curiae American Planning Association Colorado Chapter:
Gilbert F. McNeish
Paul F. Wisor
Grimshaw & Harring, P.C.

Appeal from the District Court, San Miguel County, 04CV22

Docketed: March 27, 2007

At Issue: October 16, 2007

cont’d on next page

07SA101

cont’d from previous page

ISSUE(S):

Whether, by its Order Denying SMVC’s Motion to Dismiss and granting the Town’s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, the trial court erred in holding that section 38-1-101(4), C.R.S.(2006), is unconstitutional.

Whether, by its Order Denying SMVC’s Motion to Dismiss and granting the Town’s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, the trial court erred in holding that the Town had the authority to condemn SMVC’s property under Article XX of the Colorado Constitution.

______


Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:00 a.m

EN BANC

06SC651 (½ HOUR)

Petitioner:
RONALD REYNOLDS, JR.,
v.
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. / )))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
Douglas K. Wilson
Colorado State Public Defender
Shann Jeffery
Deputy State Public Defender
For the Respondent:
John W. Suthers
Attorney General
Matthew D. Grove
Assistant Attorney General
Rebecca Adams
Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Justice Section

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 04CA0053

Docketed: October 2, 2006

At Issue: November 13, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether the court erred in admitting “res gestae” evidence of two prior drive-by incidents involving verbal confrontations and threats between Defendant and the victim.

______

Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:30 a.m.

EN BANC

07SC4 (½ HOUR)

Petitioner:
WILLIAM E. KANCILIA,
v.
Respondent:
MICHELE R. PEARSON and DENISE L. FAHY. / )))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
Curtis V. Smith
Stephen C. Cook
Smith & Cook, LLC
For the Respondent:
Rick DeWitt

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 04CA2539

Docketed: January 2, 2007

At Issue: November 13, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a creditor with non-dischargeable debt may garnish assets that a debtor claimed as exempt from the bankruptcy estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 522(l), where the exemption lacked a statutory basis under Colorado law.

______


SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m.

Oral Argument: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 EN BANC

Bailiff: Farrell Carfield

06SC330 (1 HOUR)

Petitioner:
BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
f/k/a AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY,
v.
Respondents:
DAVID PATTERSON, PHILLIP MCCOY, DONALD KANZLER, and SHIRLEY KANZLER. / ))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
Scott S. Barker
Marcy G. Glenn
Holland & Hart, LLP
For the Respondents:
Charles Carpenter
and
George A. Barton
Law Offices of George A. Barton, P.C.
For Amicus Curiae Colorado Oil & Gas Association:
Ken Wonstolen
Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 04CA2344

Docketed: May 19, 2006

At Issue: November 13, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether an action for the recovery of royalty payments governed by a six-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 13-80-103.5(1) (a), C.R.S. (2006), should be subject to section 13-80-108(4), C.R.S. (2006) (the “date of breach accrual provision”), or section 13-80-108(6), C.R.S. (2006) (the “discovery accrual provision”).

______


Oral Argument: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:00 a.m.

EN BANC

07SC134 (½ HOUR)

Petitioner:
CASSANDRA LEWIS,
v.
Respondents:
FRANK LEWIS and LUCY LEWIS. / ))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
Joel C. Maguire
Dietze and Davis, P.C
For the Respondents:
Michael P. Dugan

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 05CA1463

Docketed: February 26, 2007

At Issue: October 23, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether the court of appeals applied the appropriate standard of review and reached the correct result on Petitioner's unjust enrichment claim when it held unjust enrichment to be a "mixed question of law and fact" and not a remedy "at the discretion of the trial court".

______


Oral Argument: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:30 a.m.

EN BANC

07SA249 ( 1 HOUR)

In re:
Plaintiff:
DAWN E. HOYAL, surviving spouse of Arbuth Jay Hoyal, and Dawn E. Hoyal, as the Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ARBUTH JAY HOYAL,
v.
Defendant:
PIONEER SAND COMPANY, INC. / ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) / For the Plaintiff (Respondent) Dawn E. Hoyal:
Jerry A. Retherford
Anthony A. Johnson
Kelly M. Telfeyan
Retherford, Mullen, Johnson & Bruce, LLC
and
James C. Duve
James C. Duve, P.C.
For the Defendant (Petitioner) Pioneer Sand Company:
Richard A. Waltz
John G. Simmonds
K. Brandon Cline
The Waltz Law Firm
For Amicus Curiae Colorado Defense Lawyers Association:
John R. Mann
Jennifer C. Madsen
Kennedy, Childs & Fogg, P.C.
For Amicus Curiae Colorado Trial Lawyers Association:
Jesse Howard Witt
Benson & Associates PC
and
Victoria Swanson
Sears & Swanson, P.C.

Original Proceeding, District Court, El Paso County, 06CV1369

Docketed: August 10, 2007

At Issue: October 15, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether evidence concerning Decedent’s income tax liability is admissible for the purpose of calculating Plaintiff’s net pecuniary loss in a wrongful death action. ______


SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 1:30 p.m.

Oral Argument: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 EN BANC

Bailiff: Jared Butcher

07SC60 (½ HOUR)

Petitioner:
JOSHUA LEYVA,
v.
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. / )))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
Antony M. Noble
The Joffe Law Firm
For the Respondent:
John W. Suthers
Attorney General
Majid Yazdi
Assistant Attorney General
Appellate Division

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 05CA0792

Docketed: January 22, 2007

At Issue: November 23, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether a motion for postconviction relief is timely filed if it is filed within three years of the date that an illegal sentence is corrected by the district court.

______


Oral Argument: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 2:00 p.m.

EN BANC

07SC583 (½ HOUR)

Petitioners:
INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; RESOURCES ONE, LLC d/b/a TERRA FIRMA; and PINNACOL ASSURANCE,
v.
Respondent:
TIM FERA. / )))))))))))) / For the Petitioners Pinnacol Assurance and Resources One, LLC:
Harvey D. Flewelling
Pinnacol Assurance
For the Respondent:
Jennifer E. Bisset

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 06CA1549

Docketed: July 6, 2007

At Issue: November 29, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that Rule 16-10(F) of the workers’ compensation rules of procedure, 7 Colo. Code Regs. section 1101-3 (2007), and section 8-43-304(1), C.R.S. 2007, permit a claimant to pursue a claim for penalties against an employer for “unreasonableness” in denying prior authorization of medical treatment where the denial was made pursuant to the procedural requirements of Rule 16-10.

______


Oral Argument: Thursday, January 24, 2008 9:00 a.m.

Bailiff: Richard Murray EN BANC

07SC255 (1 HOUR)

Petitioners:
AVALANCHE INDUSTRIES, INC.; GREAT STATES INSURANCE COMPANY c/o COLORADO INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION; and WESTERN GUARANTY FUND,
v.
Respondents:
INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and GLADYS LOUISE CLARK. / )))))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioners:
Thomas L. Kanan
C. Adam Foster
McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP
For the Respondent Gladys L. Clark:
Gordon J. Heuser
Heuser & Heuser, LLP.
For the Respondent ICAO:
John W. Suthers
Attorney General
Laurie Rottersman
Mark N. McMullen
Assistant Attorney General
For Amicus Curiae for Pinnacol Assurance:
Harvey D. Flewelling

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 06CA0716

Docketed: April 5, 2007

At Issue: November 5, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding under the circumstances of this case that the Workers’ Compensation claimant’s average weekly wage could be recalculated when her condition worsened, using the wage she was earning five years later from a different employer.

Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming a recalculation of the claimant’s average weekly wage following the worsening of her condition, based on her most recent employer’s COBRA costs rather than the COBRA costs of the Respondent-Employer when she left his employ.

______

Oral Argument: Thursday, January 24, 2008 10:00 a.m. EN BANC

06SC810 (½ HOUR)

Petitioner:
TERRY SANOFF,
v.
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. / ))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
Douglas K. Wilson
Colorado State Public Defender
Mark G. Walta
Deputy State Public Defender
For the Respondent:
John W. Suthers
Attorney General
Paul Koehler
Assistant Attorney General
Appellate Division
Criminal Justice Section

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 03CA0522

Docketed: December 11, 2006

At Issue: December 14, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law when stating that petitioner’s first direct appeal was premature because petitioner filed it after her conviction entered, but before the specific amount of restitution was determined.

______


Oral Argument: Thursday, January 24, 2008 10:30 a.m.

EN BANC

06SC555 (1 HOUR)

Petitioner:
MICHAEL G. KRUSE d/b/a SECURITY MORTGAGE BROKERS,
v.
Respondent:
DOUGLAS M. MCKENNA. / )))))))))))))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
Larry Dean Valente
For the Respondent:
Richard B. Rose
Sawaya, Rose, Funderburg & Kaplan, P.C.
and
Andrew L. Quiat
The Law Offices of Andrew L. Quiat, P.C.
For Amicus Curiae Consumer Crusade Inc:
A.M. Demirali
The Demirali Law Firm P.C.
For Amicus Curiae Stephen C. Oliver; Stephen Oliver Holdings, Inc., d/b/a Mile High Karate; MHK South University, Inc.; Mile High Karate, LLC; and Martial Arts Marketing, LLC:
Jack D. Robinson
Spies, Powers & Robinson, P.C.
For Amicus Curiae iHire, Inc.:
Brandee L. Caswell
Faegre & Benson LLP

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, 05CA0191

Docketed: September 1, 2006

At Issue: June 29, 2007

ISSUE(S):

Whether the court of appeals’ ruling that Colorado courts have subject matter jurisdiction over federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act claims due to a legislative “acknowledgment” is in error and must be reversed.

______


SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 9:00 a.m.

Oral Argument: xxxxxxx, , 2007 EN BANC

Bailiff:

97SC000 ( HOUR)

))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals,

Docketed:

At Issue:

ISSUE(S):

______


Oral Argument: xxxxxxx, , 2007 10:00 a.m.

EN BANC

97SC000 ( HOUR)

))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, xxxxxx

Docketed:

At Issue:

ISSUE(S):

______

Oral Argument: xxxxxxx, , 2007 10:30 a.m.

EN BANC

97SC000 ( HOUR)

))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, xxxxxxx

Docketed:

At Issue:

ISSUE(S):

______


SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO 1:30 p.m.

Oral Argument: xxxxxxx, , 2007 EN BANC

Bailiff:

97SC000 ( HOUR)

))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals,

Docketed:

At Issue:

ISSUE(S):

______

Oral Argument: xxxxxxx, , 2007 2:30 p.m.

EN BANC

97SC000 ( HOUR)

))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, xxxxx

Docketed:

At Issue:

ISSUE(S):

Oral Argument: xxxxxxx, , 2007 3:00 p.m.

EN BANC

97SC000 ( HOUR)

))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, xxxxxx

Docketed:

At Issue:

ISSUE(S):


No orals, case submitted on the briefs

EN BANC

97SC000 ( NO ORALS)

))))))))))))))))) / For the Petitioner:
For the Respondent:

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, xxxxxxx

Docketed:

At Issue:

ISSUE(S):