16December2011

ProductivityCommission
LB2CollinsStreetEast
MelbourneVic8003

Re:BarrierstoEffectiveClimateChangeAdaptation-Publicinquiry

TotheCommissioners,

Wethankyoufortheopportunitytomakeasubmissiontothe Productivity Commission Public Inquiryintothebarrierstoeffectiveclimatechangeadaptation.

Thissubmission,preparedbythecoordinatorsoftheWaterGovernanceResearchInitiative – anactivityoftheNationalClimateChangeAdaptationResearchFacility(NCCARF)WaterNetwork – outlinesopportunitiesforembeddingasystemicandadaptivegovernanceregimetomoreeffectively overcome barriers to climate change adaptation.TheobjectivesoftheWaterGovernanceResearchInitiativearetocreateacommunityofconversationaboutwatergovernanceinAustralia,buildcollaborativeresearchlinks,createopportunitiesforco-researchingandinformationsharing,andprovideopportunitiesforearly-careerresearcherstoparticipateinanationalnetworkofresearchersandresearch-users(

This submission focuses on water governance. We attach three Policy Briefings prepared by our Network, and emphasise four key messages in the text below.

Pleasefeelfreetocontactusforanyfurtherinformationorclarificationregardingoursubmission.

Yourssincerely

TheNCCARFWaterGovernanceResearchInitiative

Professor LeeGodden

Professor Ray Ison

Dr Philip Wallis

Ms Naomi Rubenstein

with assistance from Mr Anthony Kung

Introduction

Climatechangeadaptationhastobegroundedinspecificdomainssuchaswater, bushfire, transport orenergy.Oursubmissionconcernswateranditsgovernanceinaclimate-changeworld.Weacknowledgethatmarketshavebeenimportantingrantingflexibilitytoindividualsandbusinesses, however,weemphasisethatmarkets,andmarket-basedmechanisms,arebythemselvesinsufficient.Arangeofapproachesisrequired.Inparticular,adaptingtoclimatechangewillrequireabroaderstrategywithinwhichmarketmechanismsoperateasoutlinedinFigure1.


Figure1. Governancemechanismsbasedondifferentepistemologicalassumptionsforsituationslikeclimatechangeadaptation(Source:Isonetal2007)[1].

Itisgovernmentthatsetstherangeofstrategiesunderwhichmarketsoperate.WeurgetheCommissiontoacknowledgethatgovernmenthasasignificantleadershiprolethatextendsbeyondcorrectingmarketfailures. AsevidenceforthisassertionwereferyoutothesetofpaperspublishedasaspecialissueofthejournalWaterResourcesManagementwhichwehaveco-edited(seeAnnex1).

(1)The ‘problem-situation’ mustbereframed – marketbarriersarenottheonlybarrierstoadaptation

Theissuespaperofthisinquiryevidencesaproblem-framingdeficiency.Page8suggeststhatgovernmentinterventioncouldaddresssomebarrierstoadaptation,butlargelyinsofarassuchinterventionaddressesmarketfailures,ormarginalbehaviouralconsiderations.

Werecognisethatmanybarrierstoadaptationcanbeassessedusingamarket-basedanalysis.Forexample,buildingleveebankstoprotectpropertyincreasesfloodintensitydownstream.Thisisanegativeexternalitythatcanbeaddressedbyadjustingbuildingstandardsandinsurancestructures.

However,framingadaptationasprimarilyanissueofmarketefficiencyorofriskcanforecloseimportantdiscussion.Climatechangeisa ‘wicked’ problem,characterisedbycomplexity,connectedness,conflictandmultipleperspectives.[2]

Weencourageashiftfromimpact-basedpoliciestovulnerability-basedpoliciesthatbuildadaptivecapacity.[3]Impact-basedpoliciesseektobetterpredictthefutureandreduceuncertainty.Theseincludeattemptstodistributeloss,changelanduse,oravoidtheeffectsofclimatechange.Marketanalysestendtowardsimpact-basedpolicies.

Incontrast,vulnerability-basedpoliciesacceptfutureuncertainty,andseektolearnfromthepast.Suchpoliciesaimtobuildadaptivecapacityandsociallearning,whichmeanstheeaseatwhichinstitutions(andindividuals)canadapttonewconditions.Marketanalysestendtoignorethistypeofreform,yetbotharenecessary.[4]TherecentpaperbyWallisandIson(2011)[5]outlineshowinstitutionalcomplexity,includinghistoryandinitialstartingconditionsgivesrisetopathwaydependenciesandtechnologicallock-inthatcanleadtothefailureofnewinstitutions,includingmarketmechanisms.

Inshort,asignificantbarriertoadaptationiscontinuingtoseetheroleofgovernmentasprimarilytoservicethemarket(p.11,IssuesPaper).Theclassificationofbarriers(p.7,IssuesPaper)isinappropriatebecauseitwhollyignorestheneedtobuildadaptivecapacityandappreciateinstitutionalcomplexity.

WerecommendthattheCommissionreframetheinquirytorecognisethatharnessingmarketforcesisonlyoneofmanyapproachesrequiredtoadapttoclimatechange. Adaptation should also be reframed to present positive opportunities, such as a move to a low carbon, less 'impact', form of economy and society.

(2)Adaptivewatergovernanceneedslong-termplanning;governmentsneedtotakealeadrole

Webelievethatmarketmechanismsareimportant,buttheymustbeusedwithinbroaderstrategiesandinstitutionalplanningledbygovernment.

AstheattachedWaterPolicyBriefingNo.1notes,watergovernanceinAustraliaistrendingtowardstightercentralcontrol.WeendorsetherecentNationalWaterCommissionassessmentofAustralia’swaterresources.TheNWCreportsthatthewaterplanningcyclecantakeupto15years,andthatstronggovernanceandinstitutionalarrangementsarenecessarytoensurethatthebenefitsofimprovedpracticeflowacrossallregionsandplans.[6] OurNetworkmembersalsosupportthecontinuationoftheNWCinanexpandedandmoreindependentroleasakeymeanstogeneratelong-termsystemicandadaptivegovernance,whichisneededasaresponsetotheuncertaintiesofclimatechange.

WepointoutthatnewinstitutionalformsliketheCommonwealthEnvironmentWaterHolder(CEWH)areproductsofinstitutionalplanning.TheCEWHoperatesasamarketactor,butitwouldnothavebeenestablishedifthesoleroleofgovernmentweretofacilitateprivatemarketresponses.Thisisanexampleofmarketmechanismsoperatingwithinbroaderstrategicandinstitutionalplanningledbygovernment.Similarly,theproposedMurray–DarlingBasinPlan[7]demonstrateslong-termresourceplanningunderwhichwatertradingfunctions.

Wedonotmeanthatadaptivemeasuresshouldbecentralised,however.Onthecontrary,large-scale,centralisedinfrastructurecreatespathwaydependencies,whichlockusintocertainapproaches.[8]Forexample,buildingadesalinationplanttoadapttowaterscarcityreducestheincentiveandcapacityofcitycouncilstofindmorelocalisedsolutions.

Rather,weadvocateintegratedplanninginwhichsociallearningprinciplesareusedtoco-ordinatethemulti-levelinstitutionsthatgovernAustralia’swaterresources.Governmentsshouldsteer,notrow.[9]Failuretoco-ordinateadaptiveresponsesmayleadtooverallmaladaptation – promotingdomesticrainwatertankswithoutconcomitantdevelopmentsinpublichealthsurveillancemayincreasetheincidenceofvector-bornediseases,forexample.[10]

Wesuggestthatabarriertoadaptationisthelackoflong-term,government-ledplanningthatincreasesadaptivecapacitythroughsociallearningaswellasgovernanceresearchwhichbetterinformsthedesignandimplementationofinstitutionsandtherolesforagencies highlightedbytheVFRandComriereports.

(3)Wemustconsiderwholesystemsthinkingforwatergovernance

Forthepastdecadeormore,ruralwaterscarcityhasdominatedwaterdebates.Floodrisk,forexample,hasbeenlargelyneglected.[11]Astheattachedpolicybriefingsdiscuss,sotoohavewaterquality,surfacewater/groundwaterinteractions,urbanwatermanagement,andtheeffectoflanduseonwateryields.Yetclimatechangeislikelytoaffectallofthese.Untilthereisstrategicplanningforthewholewatersystem,adaptationwillnotbeeffective.

ThereisalsoadangerthattheresponsebyGovernmentstoreportssuchastheVFRandComriereport(seebelow)willreflect “siloed” thinking anddecision-makingratherthanwholeofgovernmentresponses. Inthisregardclimatechangeadaptationtobeeffectivehastobeawholeofgovernmentapproachthatisembeddedthroughouttheplanningandregulatorysystem.

(4)Decision-makersneedtoengagecommunity

WecommendtheCommissionforinquiringintobehaviouralandculturalbarrierstoadaptation.However,theIssuesPaper(p.10)remainsfocusedonsuchbarriersastheyrelatetomarkets.Wewouldgofurther.AsdiscussedinWaterPolicyBriefingNo.2,thereisa ‘paucityofeffectiveintegrationofcommunityvaluesandbest-practicecommunityengagementinwatergovernance’.Communityengagementleadstoappropriategoalsandsolutions,andhelpsminimiseconflict.NeighbourhoodEnvironmentImprovementPlansaregoodexamplesofhowcommunitiescaneffectadaptation.[12]However,thecommunityismorethanacollectionofrationaleconomicactors.Consequently,effectiveadaptationrequiresthatgovernmentsunderstand,considerandengagecommunities.

InthisregardwedrawattentionintorecommendationcontainedintworecentmajorinquiriesinVictoria,namely(i)TheVictorianFireRoyalCommission(VFR)recommendation(No.93)thatthestatecomprehensivelypursuetheobjectiveofachieving(wherepossible)thepriorityoutcomesoftheNationalStrategyforDisasterResilienceandtheimperativeofsharedresponsibility,inparticularby:

• requiringthatlocalknowledgeisconsideredasacriticalcomponentofallphasesofemergencymanagement

• involvinglocalcommunitiesinthedevelopmentandownershipofcommunityresilienceplansbasedonan ‘allhazards’ approachandtailoredforthespecificneedsofeachcommunity

• encouraginglocalcommunitiestoformresiliencecommitteestodevelopandadministercommunityresilienceplans

• nominatingVictoriaPoliceastheleadagencyininitiatingthestrategytodevelopcommunityresiliencecommittees;and

• requiringemergencyserviceagenciestoconsultandengagewithlocalcommunityresiliencecommitteesinthepreparation,planning,responseandrecoveryphasesofemergencymanagement,and

(ii)therecommendationintheComrieFloodInquiry[p.220]whichsays: ‘TheVFRisawareofanongoingprojectthatisdesignedtobuildcommunityresilienceandempowercommunitiestopreparefor,respondtoandrecoverfromemergencies.Thisprojectexistsunderthebannerofafirelearningnetworkof ‘strategicconversations’ andisbeingundertakenbytheKnowledgeandLearningUnitoftheOfficeofLandandFireattheDSE.Theconversations “valuelocalknowledgeandexperienceandstrengthentheexistingnetworksthroughwhichpeoplesupporteachother,shareknowledgeandmakesenseofthethingsthatplacestressoncommunitylife.Theyareenablinggovernmenttoparticipatemeaningfullyindialoguewithcommunitiesaboutthingsthatmattertothelocalpeople,andtodeliveritsservicesmoreeffectively”.

Conclusion:Whatconstituteseffectivegovernanceandeffectiveadaptationrequiresresearch

Adapting to climate change is an immensely complex task. No one approach will be sufficient, and failure to recognise the ‘wickedness’ of climate change constitutes perhaps the most significant barrier to adaptation.

This submission, and the accompanying policy briefings, recommends a governance approach that use social learning as a way of increasing adaptive capacity. While market mechanisms play an important role in granting flexibility to individuals, they must exist in broader strategic and planning efforts enabled by government.

Annex1-SpecialIssueonWaterGovernanceinaClimateChangeWorld:AppraisingSystemicandAdaptiveEffectiveness

GuestEditors:LeeGodden,RaymondL.IsonandPhilipJ.Wallis

WaterResourcesManagement

Volume25,Number15/December2011

WaterGovernanceinaClimateChangeWorld:AppraisingSystemicandAdaptiveEffectiveness

LeeGodden,RaymondL.IsonandPhilipJ.Wallis.p.3971-3976

SustainableCatchmentManaginginaClimateChangingWorld:NewIntegrativeModalitiesforConnectingPolicyMakers,ScientistsandOtherStakeholders

RayIson,KevinCollins,JohnColvin,JaniceJigginsandPierPaoloRoggero,etal.p.3977-3992

WaterReformandtheFederalSystemintheMurray-DarlingBasin

DanielConnell.p.3993-4003

DevelopingPurposefulandAdaptiveInstitutionsforEffectiveEnvironmentalWaterGovernance

AnitaFoerster.p.4005-4018

TowardsAdaptiveIntegratedWaterResourcesManagementinSouthernAfrica:TheRoleofSelf-organisationandMulti-scaleFeedbacksforLearningandResponsivenessintheLetabaandCrocodileCatchments

SharonPollardandDerickduToit.p.4019-4035

PoliticalandProfessionalAgencyEntrapment:AnAgendaforUrbanWaterResearch

RebekahBrown,RichardAshleyandMeganFarrelly.p.4037-4050

WaterLawandPlanningFrameworksUnderClimateChangeVariability:SystemicandAdaptiveManagementofFloodRisk

LeeGoddenandAnthonyKung.p.4051-4068

TheImpactofInstitutionalPathDependenceonWaterMarketEfficiencyinVictoria,Australia

EdwynaHarris.p.4069-4080

AppreciatingInstitutionalComplexityinWaterGovernanceDynamics:ACasefromtheMurray-DarlingBasin,Australia

PhilipJ.WallisandRaymondL.Ison.p.4081-4097

[1]Ison,R.L.,Röling,N.Watson,D.(2007)Challengestoscienceandsocietyinthesustainablemanagementanduseofwater:investigatingtheroleofsociallearning.EnvironmentalSciencePolicy10(6)499 – 511.

[2]APSC, 2007 Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective Australian Public Service Commission, Canberra, 16 December,

[3]JanMcDonald, ‘MappingtheLegalLandscapeofClimateChangeAdaptation’ inTimBonyhady,AndrewMacintoshandJanMcDonald(eds),AdaptationtoClimateChange:LawandPolicy(TheFederationPress,2010),1,10.

[4]DKennedy,LStockerandGBurke(2010)'Australianlocalgovernmentactiononclimatechangeadaptation:somecriticalreflectionstoassistdecision-making',LocalEnvironment15:805–816.

[5]Wallis,P.Ison,R.L.(2011)Appreciatinginstitutionalcomplexityinwatergovernancedynamics:acasefromtheMurray-DarlingBasin,Australia,WaterResourcesManagement25(15)4081.(DOI:1007/s11269-011-9885-z)

[6]NationalWaterCommission,TheNationalWaterInitiative – securingAustralia'swaterfuture:2011assessment(September2011,Canberra).

[7]Murray–DarlingBasinAuthority,ProposedBasinPlan(November2011,Canberra).

[8]RebekahBrown,RichardAshleyMeganFarrelly(2011) ‘PoliticalandProfessionalAgencyEntrapment:AnAgendaforUrbanWaterResearch’,WaterResourcesManagement25(15):4037–4050.SeealsoAnitaFoerster(2011) ‘DevelopingPurposefulandAdaptiveInstitutionsforEffectiveEnvironmentalWaterGovernance’,WaterResourcesManagement25(15):4005–4015.

[9]NeilGunninghamandCameronHolley(2010) ‘Bringingthe'R'wordback:regulation,environmentprotectionandNRM’,OccasionalPaper3/2010,TheAcademyoftheSocialSciencesinAustralia,Canberra.

[10]McDonald,aboven1,26.

[11]LeeGoddenandAnthonyKung, ‘WaterLawandPlanningFrameworksUnderClimateChangeVariability:SystemicandAdaptiveManagementofFloodRisk’,WaterResourcesManagement25(15):4051–4068.

[12]NeilGunningham,CameronHolleyandCliffordShearing(2007) ‘Neighbourhoodenvironmentimprovementplans:Communityempowerment,voluntarycollaborationandlegislativedesign’ EnvironmentalandPlanningLawJournal24:125–151.