Bibliotherapy for Adolescents with Learning Disabilities:

Addressing Social Skills through Shakespearean Literature

Peggy L. Anderson, Ph.D., Metropolitan State College of Denver

8840 E. Long Court, Englewood, Colorado, 80112

Judith D. Anderson, J.D., Declues & Burkett

38 Fort Sumter, Irvine, California 92629

Abstract

Bibliotherapy has historically been accepted as an appropriate social/emotional strategy for providing assistance to both children and adolescents with disabilities. Typically bibliotherapeutic techniques have been used to help the individual come to terms with the disability by reading about literary characters who have faced the challenge of problems similar to those of the reader. The premise of this instruction is rooted in bibliotherapy theory, which suggests that reading can promote a type of affective healing. During the past decade educators have begun exploring the use of literature in a structured curricular framework for teaching social skills to students who have not spontaneously learned these. This approach represents an extension of previously used bibliotherapeutic techniques. The current paper describes one instructional approach that involves the pairing of social skill objectives with the teaching of Shakespearean literature for purposes of improving social cognition and problem-solving.

Teachers of children with learning disabilities have tremendous responsibilities in meeting both the academic and social/emotional needs of their students. However, in the past two decades of educational reform in the United States, it appears that attention to social and emotional needs has been relegated to a less significant curricular role as emphasis has shifted almost exclusively to meeting academic standards. Arguably, academic standards are of critical importance, but meeting the educational needs of the student with a disability must include attention to the social/emotional as well as the academic. For if these individuals do not exhibit social and emotional competence, it is highly unlikely that they will meet the challenge of independent living when they transition into the community. Teachers of students with learning disabilities must be prepared to practice affective therapy to support the emotional needs of these students and to teach critical social skills.

Social Skills Research

It has been documented that students with learning disabilities often exhibit significant problems with social relationships, such as making friends and behaving appropriately in different social contexts (1). In fact, the acquisition of social skills by students with learning disabilities has been cited as a problem that is equally significant as the academic and language problems of this group of learners (2)(3). These deficits continue to persist through adulthood, when they have a devastating effect on the lives of these individuals---perhaps even more so than a lack of academic skills (4).

Although the literature clearly documents the social difficulties that are often concomitant to the academic deficits of students with learning disabilities, practitioners have struggled with the best intervention for alleviating these problems. Forness and Kavale (5) conducted a meta-analysis of 53 studies of social skills training in the 15 years prior to the date the research was published. The results of this meta-analysis revealed that little measurable progress has been made with these students in terms of social skills growth. Forness and Kavale suggested that a number of variables, including insufficient emphasis on cognitive, linguistic, or academic components, could be responsible for the absence of growth in this area. These researchers suggested that social skill training might need to be more closely coordinated with academic training to achieve maximum results.

Bibliotherapy and Social Skill Development

Given the social and academic needs of students with learning disabilities, it would appear that bibliotherapy would be an appropriate strategy that could be highly effective for supporting academic as well as emotional growth. Although there are many perspectives on bibliotherapy, Johnson, Wan, Templeton, Graham, and Sattler (6) address one perspective that is particularly relevant to the bibliotherapeutic technique described in this paper. They interpret bibliotherapy as the process by which teachers make decisions regarding appropriate literature and then match this literature to the needs of the learner in an effort to assist the learner in the development of self-awareness, problem-solving, and perspective-taking with the objective of achieving enhanced perception of problems. Consistent with this interpretation is Caffee’s (7) observation that bibliotherapy employs literature as a “change agent,” suggesting that when change does occur through reading, it must be described in terms of a growth process encouraged by identification with characters and catharsis, leading to greater self-awareness.

Cultural Literacy and Bibliotherapy

A teacher who embarks upon the journey to implement bibliotherapy into a literacy program has a vast array of literature to choose from. Why then should a teacher be encouraged to select Shakespeare? After all Shakespeare is feared by many, the majority of whom may perceive him to be a scholastic ogre of sorts rather than a brilliant playwright who weaves fanciful plots with wide audience appeal. Persuasive arguments are needed to encourage adolescents to adjust their negative preconceptions of this author. Marva Collins (8), a teacher and author of considerable reputation in the United States, provides a convincing testimony for the integration of Shakespeare into the curriculum. In an egalitarian fashion, Collins recommends the use of classic literature, and Shakespeare in particular, for students of all ages and ability levels. And she has written extensively on her successful experiences teaching Shakespeare as part of the elementary education curriculum in an inner city school. Her experiences counter the anachronistic notion that Shakespeare’s works should be the exclusive territory of accelerated classrooms for high achieving college preparatory students. Hirsch, Kett, and Trefil (9), advocates of what is referred to in the United States as “cultural literacy,” have also attested to the importance of classic literature for everyone. They have discussed the idea of becoming culturally literate as a cumulative journey that will assist a learner to make increasing sense of the world. Hirsh and his colleagues stated that achieving cultural literacy should be the objective of all educational reform. It is certainly possible to argue that an individual who has no frame of reference for phrases, such as “to be or not to be” and “I smell a rat” might be at a disadvantage in any number of social or educational situations. Teachers who are concerned with the reading demands of classic literature for their students with learning disabilities should be referred to numerous teaching resources that offer modifications of this material

Using selected Shakespearean works to teach social skills is a strategy that maximizes available instructional time. The student has the benefit of learning the literature while at the same time acquiring essential social cognition skills that will hopefully be transferred to other settings. This type of integrated curriculum may also be more effective than teaching these areas separately, as Forness and Kavale (5) have suggested that growth in this area may be contingent upon coordinating the academic content with the affective to achieve optimal results.

Shakespeare and Adolescence Interests: The Perfect Match

If social skills are to be learned within the curriculum, the teacher’s challenge is to offer a framework that is compatible with the context of the students’ lives. Power struggles with adults, sex, and TV/movie violence are usually of great interest to teens. Thorson (10), who taught a Shakespeare unit to students with learning disabilities, found it unsurprising that this group of adolescents was always interested in her comments about “disgusting violence, teen sex, blue jokes, and disagreeable adults prevalent in these works” (p. 576). Thus, teachers who teach Shakespeare with an emphasis on those story elements are likely to get more mileage from the curriculum. Perhaps it was the bawdiness of the jokes running throughout all of Shakespeare’s works that made his plays favorites of the common man in the 16th and 17th centuries. And perhaps it will be the fighting between teen and parent in Romeo and Juliet or the feminist theme in the Merchant of Venice that will strike a spark of interest and open the door for problem-solving and increased self-awareness for today’s teen reader.

A Structured Bibliotherapeutic Approach to Social Skill Instruction

Sclabassi (11) recommended that bibliotherapy could best be understood in terms of four separate applications: self-actualization, social utilization, psychotherapeutic utilization, and educational/didactic utilization. For purposes of this paper, the application of social utilization will be emphasized. Sclabassi described this aspect of bibliotherapy as exerting influence on social functioning; the premise being that social skill development can be improved through reading selected works. Thus, instructional objectives that address social acceptance, social standing, and social awareness may significantly impact this aspect of the individual’s life. In terms of incorporating bibliotherapy into instructional units, there are many different approaches. Aiex (12) has suggested a comprehensive plan that includes a sequence of steps to assist teachers and therapists for implementation of an effective program. This instructional sequence includes the following steps: (1) motivational activities, (2) actual reading, (3) incubation time, (4) discussion activities and (5) evaluation and closure. When working with students with disabilities, it is important that the teacher or therapist provide extension activities at each level to reinforce the material and accommodate the learner’s unique instructional needs. Aiex’s instructional sequence lends itself particularly well to a bibliotherapeutic approach that addresses social skill instruction.

Program Planning

In reference to the motivational activities, teachers may need to use additional strategies that are more varied for learners with disabilities. It may well be enough for typical learners to have their teacher provide some thought provoking questions for consideration before beginning their reading, but the student with a disability will likely need more intensive activities that provide additional stimulation. Preparing students with learning disabilities to study Shakespeare is as important as the actual introduction and teaching of the lessons. Many of these students may be apprehensive because of what they have heard regarding the complexity of Shakespeare. Achieving some level of comfort and piquing interest will assist in meeting the objectives of the bibliotherapy. Orientation to the story can be accomplished in a number of different ways. Showing films to the students can be very helpful in this process. There are many choices in the case of Romeo and Juliet. The film West Side Story is a modern day version of this classic Shakespearean play, as is the more recent film version of Romeo and Juliet starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Clare Danes. Typically adolescents find it relaxing and entertaining to view films, which can ultimately be a nonthreatening and enjoyable way to introduce Shakespeare to reluctant readers.

For the actual reading of the selected Shakespearean work, the teacher or therapist will want to choose one of the numerous adaptations available to reduce the complexity of the literature. The Streamlined Shakespeare Series (13) is recommended because it offers a summary of each play in narrative form and an adaptation of the play at the fourth grade reading level. Even though the adaptation may be significantly lower in reading level, it is important that the teacher guide the adolescent throughout the reading to be sure that actual comprehension is within performance expectations.

During the “incubation time” students can engage in some free writing activities explaining how they have reacted to various aspects of the play. These free writing exercises allow the students to begin to form ideas about the characters and their actions. In some cases, adolescents with learning disabilities will be opposed to writing because of weak skills in this area. In that situation, oral discussions within cooperative learning groups will serve as an alternate strategy for “incubation” activities. Teachers will again want to guide the discussion with particular reaction questions that will encourage thinking about the social situations in the play.

Social Skill Literature Strategy (SSLS)

During steps four and five (i.e., discussion and closure), it is recommended that teachers use a structured approach to encouraging problem-solving and social cognition. A strategy such as the Social Skill Literature Strategy (SSLT) (14) can be a particularly effective bibliotherapeutic approach. This strategy involves the use of three separate instructional activities: (1) interpreting events, (2) interpreting feelings and signals, and (3) developing alternate outcomes. In reference to interpreting events, the teacher instructs the student to write down one of the main events that occurred in a particular scene. For example, in Romeo and Juliet, the student might respond by writing “Tybalt starts a fight.” Then the student must interpret that event by indicating the consequence, which in this example is the death of Mercutio. For the next step (Interpreting Feelings and Signals), the student is asked to identify one of the main characters of the scene and describe in one or two words the emotions that this character experienced. The student then identifies specific signals indicating that these emotions were felt by this character. In the case of the character Tybalt, the student would identify “anger” as the most obvious emotion and “drawing his sword” as the signal for this emotion. In the final step (Developing Alternate Outcomes), the student must identify a character’s actions that are specifically linked to outcomes. For example, the teacher would want the students to recognize that Tybalt started the fight that eventually resulted in the separation of Romeo and Juliet. After a thorough discussion that emphasizes the relationship among actions, events and consequences for the examples given, the students can go back and choose another main event to evaluate and repeat the process.

Throughout the activities in the SSLT, the teacher leads the students through the steps necessary to examine the profiles of the characters in relation to their feelings, actions and the consequences. In this bibliotherapeutic process, the students are encouraged to discuss real life experiences and outcomes that are similar to those described in the play. This strategy offers the potential to bring students to the level that they begin to understand the degree of control they could maintain over their environment and the obligations they have to others, which hopefully empowers the individual to make positive changes. When adolescents begin to see parallels between their own life events and events in the play, teachers can use reflective discussions to encourage problem-solving and social awareness.

Conclusion

As a teacher of adolescents, it is important to remember that constructivist principles dictate that students will learn content that is most relevant to their lives. Poplin (15) asserted that teachers need to know what is valued by their students in order to take advantage of optimal learning situations. While many teachers might question the relevance of Shakespeare’s plots to the lives of students today, a closer look may reveal a different picture. A student who is experiencing anguish because her parents will not allow her to date the boy of her choice may find it easy to relate to Juliet’s experiences with her parents. Using Shakespeare in a bibliotherapeutic technique will not only help that adolescent better understand her current predicament and options, but it will also assist in the achievement of important literacy standards. Although there are many critics of bibliotherapy who contend that this technique is questionable, it is important to remember that students who are provided with this instructional approach would ultimately have gained a working knowledge of Shakespeare at the very least--- and at the very best, they would have also increased their social cognition and social problem-solving skills, which is a significant step toward enhancing healthy emotional adjustment.