Rubric IDP Report / Academic Session : Semester 1 2017/2018
Revision : 002/2017
RUBRIC FORASSESSING IDP REPORT
PO / Assessment Item / Beginning1 – 2 / Developing
3 – 5 / Accomplished
6 – 7 / Exemplary
8 – 10 / Weightage / Score / PO Mark
PO 1 : Engineering Knowledge
CO 1 / Apply relevant knowledge in solving given problem / task. / Limited use of knowledge and/or major misunderstanding on knowledge. / Fair use of relevant knowledge, but some misunderstanding on knowledge were spotted. / Good use of relevant knowledge but there is room for improvement. / Excellent use of relevant knowledge to solve given problem. / 15
PO 2 : Problem Analysis
CO 2 / Identify given problem. / Problem poorly presented and wrongly interpreted. / Problem fairly presented and badly interpreted. / Problem clearly presented but not clearly interpreted. / Problem excellently presented and interpreted. / 10
Explain / discuss previous research done / background study related to given problem. / Literature review not complete. / Literature review decently presented but not discussed properly. / Literature review sufficiently presented but require further discussion. / Literature review clearly presented and discussed appropriately. / 5
Analyse given problem/task. / Problem not analysed properly. / Problem partly analysed. / Problem sufficiently analysed. / Problem excellently analysed. / 10
PO 3 : Design / Development of Solution
CO 2 / Develop solution for given problem that meet specified needs and consideration for public health and safety, societal and environmental impact. / No clear solution is given (vague discussion on the solution). / Solution is fairly presented but require proper discussion and justification. / Solution is sufficiently presented but require stronger justification. / Solution is well presented and justified. / (design solution OR design component/ system/ process) 10
Design system / component / process that meet specified needs and consideration as above. / No clear design is given (vague discussion on the design). / Design is fairly presented but require proper discussion. / Design is sufficiently presented but require stronger discussion. / Design is well presented and properly discussed.
PO 5 : Modern Tool Usage
CO 3 / Demonstrate use of design software / Poor use of software (minimal effort shown) / Fair use of software (design is presented but lack of details) / Good use of software (easily understood design) / Excellent use of soft (design is properly presented) / 10
PO 7 : Environment and Sustainability
CO 4 / Incorporate environmental impact analysis in decision making / Environmental impact assessment is not done, and not considered in decision making. / Assessment is not sufficient (no details given), and not given enough consideration in decision making. / Assessment is done but not properly considered in decision making. / Excellent assessment done and properly considered in decision making. / 10
PO 9 : Communication
CO 5 / Prepare effective report and communicate information through the report / Poorly written with major mistakes in presenting information and format. / Fairly written but with a lot of mistakes in presenting information and format. / Sufficiently good with almost clear presentation of information but with minor mistake in format and presentation. / Excellently written with clear presentation of information and proper format. / 10
PO 11 : Life-long Learning
CO 7 / Engage in autonomous learning, using critical thinking to find solution for a given problem / Depends on advisor most of the time, and could not critically think solution on their own. / Fair use of critical thinking but still require a lot of advice from advisor. / Good critical thinking and can manage on their own most of the time. / Excellent use of critical thinking and very minimal input from advisor is required. / 10
PO 12 : Project Management and Finance
CO 8 / Manage project activities according to set milestones and assess costing for the project / Could not follow milestones set and costing not done thoroughly. / Meet only half of set milestones and costing requires more considerations. / Meet most of the set milestones and costing is done with enough consideration. / Meet all specified milestones and excellent costing. / 10
PO 10 : Peer Assessment – team members to assessed each other
Beginning
(1-2) / Developing
(3-5) / Accomplished
(6-7) / Exemplary
(8-10) / Weightage / Score / Marks
(%)
Handling the task / Does not complete the assigned tasks. Dependent on others to do all of the works / Does not follow most of the assigned tasks and sometimes depends on others to do the work / Completes most of the assigned tasks without depending on othersto do the work / Completes all the assigned tasks without depending on others to do the work / 30
Contributions / Rarely provides useful information or ideas for discussion. May refuse to participate. / Sometimes provides useful information and ideas for discussion. Satisfactory participation among group members / Usually provides useful information and ideas for discussion. Good participation among group members / Gather information and shares useful ideas for discussions. Information fits the group’s goals. A definite leader who contributes a lot of effort. / 40
Attitude / Often makes fun of others’ work and has a negative attitude / Sometimes make fun of the task(s) or the work of group members / Usually has a positive attitude about the task(s) and the work of group members / Always have a positive attitude about the task(s) and the work of group member / 30
Total Marks (%)
Course Code/Title : EBB 408 MATERIALS SELECTION AND DESIGN (IDP)