Post Interview Event Lead

Post Interview Event Lead

Post Interview – Event Lead

Questions

  1. How was the entry process this year compared to previous years?
  2. Did entry resubmissions work as expected?
  3. Did the support system work fine during the submission period or would an integrated support system have been better?
  4. Did the entry system meet the expectations and your initial requirements?
  5. How was the judging process this year compared to previous years?
  6. Did the support system work fine during the judging period or would an integrated support system have been better?
  7. Did the judging system meet the expectation and your initial requirements?
  8. How did the system help in communications with the affiliated stations?
  9. Would a custom email editor within the site be useful?
  10. Did the system allow a simple way for you to determine if the entries broke any of the NaSTA rules and if they met the tech standard for entries?
  11. Was the admin system easy to use or not?
  12. What would you say are the 3 main strengths of the new system are?
  13. What would you say are the 3 main weaknesses of the new system are?
  14. What would you like to see in future editions of the NaSTA Awards system?
  15. Would you use the system again in the future?

Answers

  1. Submission easier, very hard to see from uploader’s point of view feedback from uploader and buttons to upload files were very small.
  2. No -> lack of ability for people to not access database, no dashboard – couldn’t check tokens had been used, tokens good, flawed due to database access, how tokens were sent was good – inbuilt support system and linking would be better
  3. Integrated support system, other support system okay – emails was good so people could send it straight from email client
  4. Submissions yeah, resubmissions no
  5. Hard to answer as not sure
  6. Integrated support system
  7. Okay worked with some issues
  8. Average – we could have been integrated as email list was provided. So communications are listed in a messages on the site for both stations, judges and admins
  9. Not really – redundant by integrated support system which would cover this.
  10. No – in place no admin dashboard or view to view this, login and view and view the video files in the website to check if they broke the rules.
  11. No – too many links not referenced, upload system links should have been clearer.
  12. – web interface superior to ftp, immediate feedback of entry and file uploaded, - feedback going live instantly after the results, - better user experience compared to last year, - web application
  13. – missing links in the admin area, - inability for admins to view file information regarding tech specs, -
  14. Admin system, integrated system, stations able to view files, UI design for entry uploads, admin dashboard (screen display for monitoring).
  15. Yes for uploads maybe not for judging in its current state.f
Top View