F13:Research Opportunity and Performance Evidence (ROPE) – Significant research outputs and ARC grants

Notes: (please delete these notes & the statements shown below, prior to saving and uploading final version)

Part F13 (Significant research outputs and ARC grants) must not exceedfour A4 pages

Please note the page limit for this section is four pages, where 20 was the maximum in previous rounds.

(i)Your list of significant research outputs must:

(NEW- part (i) no longer limited to the last ten years- you may now include outputs from any time period)

  • Be numbered continuously (i.e. do not recommence numbering at “1” under each heading)
  • Use asterisks to identify research outputs relevant to this Proposal(this is very important for evidencing your highly relevant track record in the field)
  • Provide full details of any co-authors/co-editors, including their order on the output (if your discipline does not follow first/last author convention, include a note, i.e. "in my discipline, the senior author is usually the second author")
  • Include the acceptance date if listing in-press publications or programmed creative presentations.Forthcoming outputs without an acceptance date should not be included in section F13.
  • List publications under the headingsand in the order presented below:

Scholarly books(do not include edited books under this heading)

Edited research books, including prestigious reference works;

Scholarly book chapters

Refereed journal articles

Refereed conference papers only when the paper was published in full in the proceedings

Other research outputs (including non-traditional research outputs)

(ii) Using the below table, provide details of ARC grants awarded in the last ten years on which you have been a CI, PI or Fellow:

  • Give the ARC grant number
  • CI/PI/Fellow name in the order that they appear on the grant
  • The amount funded
  • The number of years for which the grant was awarded
  • The title of the grant
  • Nominate the reference numbers of the research outputs in the last 10 years given above in F13Part (i) that arose from your ARC grants.

Template:

Project ID / CI/PI/Fellow/Awardee Name(s) (as they appear on the grant) / Amount Funded / Amount of Years / Project Title / Outputs

*Add additional lines where necessary.

Note: If this question is not relevant to a participant, for example a PI with non-academic background, the participant should include a short explanatory statement as to why the question is not applicable to their background and role, or include any relevant information (for example, relevant outputs such as policy advice, and other professional publications).

Example:

Project ID / CI/PI/Fellow/Awardee Name(s) (as they appear on the grant) / Amount Funded / Amount of Years / Project Title / Outputs
LPXXXXXX / Prof AB Example, Prof CD Example / $XXX,XXX / X / Project 1 / 2, 3, 5, 7
DPXXXXXX / Prof EF Example, Dr GH Example, Prof IJ Example / $XXX,XXX / X / Project 2 / 4, 6, 8, 9

Additional Notes:

The use of ERA/JIF/Ranking data and similar is acceptable as long as it is kept to a minimum, forms part of the publication and no additional commentary/words are provided

The use of a small key to explain publications is acceptable as long as it ONLY describes/explains abbreviations, authorship order, certain metrics, discipline specific information, or other reasonable explanations directly related to the publication list. For example, a researcher might note that underlined authors in their publication list are PhD students.

Feedback from assessors indicates it is important to identify corresponding author for each publication; include in the small key the method used to identify this author.

Example of an acceptable key and use of ranking data:

KEY:

Q= Quartile and denotes the journals relative impact within their category, e.g.Q1 = the ‘best’ 25 % of journals in that SCI Subject Category, from Journal Citation Reports, Jan 2012

IF= 2010 5-year Impact Factor

Times Cited= from Web of Science, 3rd Feb 2013

S. Ernst, L. Aldous and R. G. Compton, 'The electrochemical reduction of oxygen at boron-doped diamond and glassy carbon electrodes: A comparative study in a room-temperature ionic liquid', Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2012, 663, 108-112. [Q2; IF 2.530, Cited 2]