EENG406 / INFE406 /
Graduation Design Project (GDP) Assessment Form
Preparation / Design / Accomplishment / Report / Presentation
Problem identification and succinct description of the significance of the project. / Literature review / Objectives / Realistic constraints (including standards) / Evaluation of alternative designs / Methodology / Realization and performance evaluation / Degree to which the prototype satisfies the design criteria / Organization and format (including references) / Clarity / Effectiveness / Defense
7.5 / 7.5 / 5 / 5 / 10 / 15 / 15 / 10 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / Total Mark
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Student Name : / Student Number:
Project Title:
Evaluator's Name and Signature: / Date:
Preparation / Design / Accomplishment / Report / Presentation
Problem identifiction and succinct description of the significance of the project. / Literature review / Objectives / Realistic constraints (including standards) / Evaluation of alternative designs / Methodology / Realization and performance evaluation / Degree to which the prototype satisfies the design criteria / Organization and format (including references) / Clarity / Effectiveness / Defense
7.5 / 7.5 / 5 / 5 / 10 / 15 / 15 / 10 / 10 / 5 / 5 / 5 / Total Mark
Jury Member #1
Jury Member #2
Jury Member #3
Jury Member #4
Jury Member #5
Average
Letter
Grade
MARK / 85-100 / 80-84 / 75-79 / 70-74 / 67-69 / 64-66 / 60-63 / 57-59 / 54-56 / 50-53 / 45-49 / 0-49
GRADE / A / A- / B+ / B / B - / C+ / C / C- / D+ / D / D- / F
GRADE SCALE:
Preparation(15%) / Design
(35%) / Accomplishment
(25%) / Report
(15%) / Presentation
(10%) / Maximum attainable points
EENG406 outcomes / Problem identifiction and succinct description of the significance of the project. / Literature review / Objectives / Realistic Constraints (including standards) / Evaluation of alternative designs / Methodology / Realization and performance evaluation / Degree to which the prototype satisfies the design criteria / Organization and format including references / Clarity / Effectiveness / Defense
(c)
an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability, / ⊠
7.5 pts / ⊠
7.5 pts / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
10pt / ⊠
15 pts / ⊠
15 pts / ⊠
10 pts / 75 pts
(d)
an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
10 pts / ⊠
15 pts / ⊠
10 pts / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
5 pts / 50 pts
(f)
an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility / ⊠
7.5 pts / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
10 pts / ⊠
5 pts / 27.5 pts
(g)
an ability to communicate effectively / ⊠
7.5 pts / ⊠
7.5 pts / ⊠
10 pts / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
5 pts / 40 pts
(h)
the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context / ⊠
7.5 pts / ⊠
7.5 pts / ⊠
10 pts / ⊠
10 pts / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
5 pts / 45 pts
(i)
A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning / ⊠
7.5 pts / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
15 pts / 27.5 pts
(k)
an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary forengineering practice / ⊠
5 pts / ⊠
10 pts / ⊠
15 pts / ⊠
15 pts / ⊠
10 pts / 55 pts
Outcome Satisfaction (%) = (points earned by student / maximum attainable points )*100