FY2008Program Performance Report(System Print Out)
Strategic Goal2
Discretionary
ESEA, Title V, Part D-4
Document Year2008Appropriation: $80,108
CFDA / 84.215L: FIE/Smaller Learning Communities
Program Goal: / To assist high schools to create smaller learning communities that can prepare all students to achieve to challenging standards and succeed in college and careers.
Objective1of1: / Students in schools receiving smaller learning communities implementation grants will demonstrate continuous improvement in achievement in core subjects, as well as exhibit positive behavioral changes.
Measure1.1of18: The percentage of students scoring at or above proficient on state math assessments. (Cohort FY04) (Desired direction: increase)89a0x9
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2005 / Set a Baseline / 53.9 / Target Met
2006 / 60 / 52.8 / Did Not Meet Target
2007 / 62 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 64 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 66 / (February 2010) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation. There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / 45.5 / Target Met
2007 / 60 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 62 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 64 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 66 / (February 2011) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation. There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2007 / Set a Baseline / 45.5 / Target Met
2008 / 60 / (September 2009) / Pending
2009 / 62 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 64 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 66 / (February 2012) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2005 / Set a Baseline / 59.8 / Target Met
2006 / 60 / 59.2 / Did Not Meet Target
2007 / 62 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 64 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 66 / (February 2010) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / 43.4 / Target Met
2007 / 60 / (February 2008) / Pending
2008 / 62 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 64 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 66 / (February 2011) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2007 / Set a Baseline / 43.4 / Target Met
2008 / 60 / (September 2009) / Pending
2009 / 62 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 64 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 66 / (February 2012) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2005 / Set a Baseline / 84.7 / Target Met
2006 / 87 / 84.7 / Did Not Meet Target
2007 / 88 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 89 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 90 / (February 2010) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / 80.4 / Target Met
2007 / 87 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 88 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 89 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 90 / (February 2011) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2007 / Set a Baseline / 80.4 / Target Met
2008 / 87 / (September 2009) / Pending
2009 / 88 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 89 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 90 / (February 2012) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2005 / Set a Baseline / 82.2 / Target Met
2006 / 83 / 83.7 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 84 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 85 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 86 / (February 2010) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / 80.3 / Target Met
2007 / 83 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 84 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 85 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 86 / (February 2011) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2007 / Set a Baseline / 80.3 / Target Met
2008 / 83 / (September 2009) / Pending
2009 / 84 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 85 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 86 / (February 2012) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2005 / Set a Baseline / 435 / Target Met
2006 / 425 / 442 / Target Exceeded
2007 / 415 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 405 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 395 / (February 2010) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / 559 / Target Met
2007 / 550 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 540 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 530 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 520 / (February 2011) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2007 / Set a Baseline / 559 / Target Met
2008 / 550 / (September 2009) / Pending
2009 / 540 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 530 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 520 / (February 2012) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2005 / Set a Baseline / 483 / Target Met
2006 / 475 / 506 / Did Not Meet Target
2007 / 465 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 455 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 446 / (February 2010) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2006 / Set a Baseline / 546 / Target Met
2007 / 540 / (September 2008) / Pending
2008 / 530 / (February 2009) / Pending
2009 / 520 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 510 / (February 2011) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Year / Target / Actual
(or date expected) / Status
2007 / Set a Baseline / 546 / Target Met
2008 / 540 / (September 2009) / Pending
2009 / 530 / (February 2010) / Pending
2010 / 520 / (February 2011) / Pending
2011 / 510 / (February 2012) / Pending
Frequency of Data Collection.Annual
Explanation.Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06 appropriation.
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards only.
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year received five-year awards.
Draft / 1 / 12/03/2008