Bus.365: Entrepreneurship / Team No.____ / Name (1)______/ Contr.%____ / Name (2) ______/ Contr.%____
Dr. Ahiarah / Name (3)______/ Contr.%____ / Name (4)______/ Contr.%____

TEAM WEEKLY ASSIGNMENT: SUMMARY OFSHARK TANK SEASON 9 EPISODE#______SUBMITTED ON DATE______
Please, rate each of your team member's contribution to the performance of the group in this particular assignment on a scale of 0 (zero) to 100 percent. You may also rate yourself.
All four members of each team are to submit only one team summary using this form. DO NOT CHANGE THE LANDSCAPE FORMAT OF THIS FORM!!!
(Your responsesmust be typed or word-processed on this form—it is expandable! A hand-written response will neither be collected nor graded!)
If team work is submitted when due, then it will be evaluated/graded for the full point value indicated for each part; if submitted after the due date but before it is discussed in class, or a graded cohort is returned, it will be evaluated/graded for no more than 0.125 points for each box. Team work missed (as any missed work is defined in the syllabus) will not be scored.Max. Score possible for each box is 0.25 pts. (EACH TEAM MEMBER IS REMINDED TO KEEP A COPY OF THIS PAGE WITH INSTRUCTOR’S MARK ON IT FOR LATER ATTACHMENT TO THE PORTFOLIO SUMMARY AT THE END OF THE SEMESTER!)

Presenter #1 / Presenter #2 / Presenter #3 / Presenter #4
1 / Name(s) of Entrepreneur(s) Presenting
2 / Name of Presenter’s Bus. Organization
3 / Idea or Value Proposition Pitched
State benefit/solution pitched for the customer
4 / Dollar Amt. Presenter Sought & % Equity Stake s/he Offered to Sharks in Exchange / Dollar Amt.:
% Equity Stake: / Dollar Amt.:
% Equity Stake: / Dollar Amt.:
% Equity Stake: / Dollar Amt.:
% Equity Stake:
5 / State Critique (Criticism), by a Shark, of this Presenter’s Pitch that most impressed you
6 / State the name of the Shark of #5 above
7a / State the Outcome/Resolution of this Pitch in terms of: (i)Dollars,(ii)% Stake agreed upon, and (iii)with which Shark(s) / (i)
(ii)
(iii) / (i)
(ii)
(iii) / (i)
(ii)
(iii) / (i)
(ii)
(iii)
7b / State 7a(iii) Shark’s Contingency rider, or Option rider, if any
7c / If “No Deal” Outcome, state Why
8 / State Team’s Takeaway(s)/Conclusion(s)—What has your team learned from each?

Note: The Team assignments are part of the design to acquaint, or at least, expose you to certain entrepreneurship knowledge/skills/abilities & requirements. We are also trying to influence your ‘following a presentation’, ‘critically processing it in the manner of savvy business persons’, conceptual and problem solving skills and abilities. We would like you to ponder or mull over presented/addressed entrepreneurship models and processes, and the degree of preparation behind what is played out in the screen. Learn from the negotiations or interactions,exemplary manifestations of entrepreneurs’ temperaments, mindset, and reactions to success or failure (as in failure to achieve the ultimate objective for pitching to the sharks or the chagrin of seeing one’s cherished notions and apparently best laid plansshot down and dismissedquickly). You expect the instructor to—and the instructor will, actually—closely review/grade your responses to this assignment. Beyond the score, what we can be sure of is that, all design notwithstanding, your take-away from these assignments will be equal to how much or what you put into them—i.e. that you will reap what you sow!