ISO 17078 Task Group Meeting Page 4
ISO 17078.1, .2, .3, .4 Meeting Minutes
November 11, 2003September 2 - 3, 2004
Attendees:
Cleon Dunham Oilfield Automation Consulting
Jim Holt Baker Oil Tools
Wayne Mabry Schlumberger
David McCalvin Schlumberger
Murat Ocalan Schlumberger
Zlatko Salihbegovic Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems
Roger Stinson Altec
Meeting Venue:
· Thursday, Friday, September 2 - 3, 2004.
· Schlumberger office, 1325 Dairy Ashford, Houston, Texas 77077.
Meeting Minutes:
1. Administrative
· The meeting convened at 8:30 am on Thursday September 2 and adjourned at 3:00 pm on the Friday, September 3, 2004.
2. ISO 17078.1
· The ISO editors have worked on the wording of 17078.1.
o Their work has been reviewed by David McCalvin and John Yonkers.
o Some of the editor’s rewording is not acceptable.
o David and John are working to maintain the technical integrity of the document.
o This will be addressed by ISO Work Group 4.
· Once the editor’s rewording has been addressed, the document goes to the ISO member countries for a final “up/down” vote.
· After the up/down vote, editorial comments made by the ISO secretariat are reviewed by Work Group 4.
· When the document is then finalized, it is printed and made available for sale.
3. ISO 17078.2
· ISO Work Group 4 has raised a few more issues on 17078.2.
o They want us to reduce the number of design and functional test levels from four to three.
§ We agree to reduce the levels of design validation to three levels. We’ll do this by merging V2 and V1 into a new V1, changing V3 to V2, and changing V4 to V3.
§ We agree to reduce the levels of product validation testing to three levels. We’ll do this by merging F2 and F1 into a new F1, changing F3 to F2, and changing F4 to F3.
o They want wording changes on the annex dealing with valve modeling.
§ We will work on this at the next meeting in San Antonio.
o We need to review the grandfather clause of the elastomer testing requirements.
§ Work Group 4 has proposed wording for this; it is acceptable pending further editorial review.
o Work Group 4 suggests we review the environmental grade requirements in Annex B.
§ A section from the SSV document has been pasted into draft of 17078.2.
§ But, we plan to use the wording from the most recent version of 17078.1.
4. ISO 17078.3
· Work on 17078.3 was the main focus of the meeting.
· The following sections were addressed:
o Forward
o Introduction
o Clause 1 – Scope
o Clause 3 – Terms and definitions
o Clause 4 – Symbols and abbreviations
o Clause 5 – Functional requirements
o Clause 6 – Design requirements
5. ISO 17078.4
· The following sections were addressed:
o Forward
o Introduction
o Clause 1 - Scope
o Clause 2 – Normative references – deleted from this document
Prepared by:
Cleon Dunham
Oilfield Automation Consulting
September 3, 2004