MGT317 Experiential Team Presentation Rubric
Exceeds Expectations / Meets Expectations / Below ExpectationsUse content to bring across learning points
/- Middle column plus
- Substantially brings across key learning points associated with topic
- Delivers topical explanations in a comprehensive yet concise manner
- Provides relevant examples and cogent supporting evidence from the observations
- Expresses originality of thought, injects personal insight into the analysis of issues
- Defines 3 chosen organization behavior topics succinctly
- Brings across key learning points somewhat. Try to expand more.
- States observations and conclusions with clarity
- Delivers topical explanations clearly with some conciseness
- Provides relevant examples and cogent supporting evidence from the observations. Expand more.
Mostly expresses originality of thought, injects personal insight into the analysis of issues
/- Chose less than 3 organization behavior topics succinctly
- Key learning points not highlighted
- Observations and conclusions unclear or unfocussed
- Topical explanations not clearly related to the concept.
- Provides few or inappropriate examples. Evidence does not support conclusions.
- Personal insight and analysis not expressed. Shared information at concrete level.
Analysis shows thought, reflection and application of theory /
- Uses 3 or more theories for each topic area to explain why the organization behaved in the way observed
- Multiple reasons for the issues observed are evaluated and explained using multiple perspectives
- Examples from the data and theory from the book are integrated to show significant understanding of the organization’s behavior
- Uses 1 -2 theories for each topic area to explain why the organization behaved in the way observed
- Some reasons for the issues observed are evaluated and explained
- Examples from the data and theory from the book are integrated to show some understanding of the organization’s behavior
- Does use theory to explain why the organization behaved in the way observed
- Issues are explained at face value, reporting out v. showing analysis
- Examples are not integrated with theory
Organize material to foster understanding /
- Well organized, structured enabling listeners to easily follow the logic and arguments
- Points and supporting evidence build on each other
- Clear introduction of purpose and description of organization
- Clear and specific conclusion
- Generally well organized with unified and coherent ideas
- Listener can mostly follow the logic and arguments
- Points and supporting evidence mostly build on each other.
- Mostly clear introduction of purpose and description of organization.
- Mostly clear and specific conclusion
- Does not develop ideas coherently
- Uneven and ineffective overall organization
- Listener struggles to follow the logic and arguments in some areas
- Points are independent of each other
- Introduction and conclusion missing and or unclear, lacking specificity
Use time effectively /
Presentation completed within time parameters
- Appropriate balance of introduction, body and conclusion
Went over or under on time outside of parameters
- Too much or insufficient time spent on introduction, body or conclusion
Use appropriate/effective audio/visuals
/- Slides strongly enhance the presentation and are prepared in a professional manner.
Slides contribute to the quality of the presentation Appropriate information is included
/Slides are poorly prepared, too much information is included or unimportant information is
Use effective presentation skills /- Presenter speaks clearly and loud enough for all in audience to hear makes no grammatical errors and pronounces all terms correctly and precisely.
- Presenter seldom uses notes, maintaining eye contact with the audience throughout the presentation
- Word choices are highly effective for conveying the concepts and key points
- Gestures are used very effectively to emphasize and strengthen the points
- high level of enthusiasm shown for the presentation
- Presenter voice is relatively clear and loud. Presenter makes a few minor grammatical errors. There are a few unnecessary pauses and filler words.
- Presenter maintains eye contact with audience most of the time and refers to notes occasionally
- Word choices mostly effective for conveying the concepts and key points
- Gestures are somewhat used to emphasize and strengthen the points
- Some enthusiasm shown for the presentation
- Presenter mumbles, mispronounces terms, and makes serious grammatical errors. There are several unnecessary pauses and filler words
- presenter reads from the slides or from notes making little eye contact
- word choice generally does not convey concepts and key points adequately
- gestures are not used or distract from the points
- Little to no enthusiasm shown for the presentation
Managed Discussion effectively /
- Column two plus
- Fostered a high level of discussion that integrated the concepts presented with other discussion points
- Answered questions directly and concisely
- Elaborated on questions
- Preparation of material evident
- Did not answer the questions directly
- Did not show evidence of preparation or deeper understanding of material
Grade