Federal Communications Commissionfcc 08-147

Federal Communications CommissionFCC 08-147

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of
Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 / )
)
)
)
) / CG Docket No. 02-278

REPORT AND ORDER

Adopted: June 11, 2008Released: June 17, 2008

By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, Tate, and McDowell issuing separate statements.

I.INTRODUCTION

1.In this Report and Order (Order), we amend the Commission’s rules under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)[1] to require sellers and/or telemarketers to honor registrations with the National Do-Not-Call Registry so that registrations will not automatically expire based on the current five year registration period. Consistent with the Do-Not-Call Improvement Act of 2007,[2] we extend this requirement indefinitely to minimize the inconvenience to consumers of having to re-register their preferences not to receive telemarketing calls and to further the underlying goal of the National Registry to protect consumer privacy rights.

II.BACKGROUND

A.The Telephone Consumer Protection Act

2.On December 20, 1991, Congress enacted the TCPA, as codified in section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, in an effort to address a growing number of telephone marketing calls and certain telemarketing practices Congress found to be an invasion of consumer privacy.[3] In relevant part, the TCPA required the Commission to “initiate a rulemaking proceeding concerning the need to protect residential telephone subscribers’ privacy rights”[4] and specifically authorized the Commission to consider “the establishment and operation of a single national database to compile a list of telephone numbers of residential subscribers who object to receiving telephone solicitations.”[5]

3.On July 3, 2003, the Commission revised the TCPA rules and adopted new rules to provide consumers with several options for avoiding unwanted telephone solicitations.[6] In particular, the Commission established a National Do-Not-Call Registry, in conjunction with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), to provide residential consumers with a one-step option to prevent unwanted telemarketing calls.[7] The National Do-Not-Call Registry, which went into effect October 1, 2003, prohibits sellers and/or telemarketers from contacting those consumers who register their telephone numbers on the do-not-call list, unless the call falls within a recognized exemption.[8] Pursuant to Commission regulations, sellers and/or telemarketers are required to honor such do-not-call registrations for a period of five years.[9] The National Do-Not-Call Registry supplemented the long-standing company-specific do-not-call rules which require companies to maintain lists of consumers who ask not to be called by a particular company.[10]

4.The Commission also concluded that a “safe harbor” should be established for sellers and/or telemarketers that have made a good faith effort to comply with the national do-not call rules.[11] Consistent with the FTC’s rules, the safe harbor provides that a seller or an entity telemarketing on behalf of the seller will not be liable for violating the national do-not-call rules if it can demonstrate that, among other things, it uses a process to prevent telemarketing calls to any telephone number on the Registry and employs a version of the Do-Not-Call Registry obtained from the administrator no more than 31 days prior to the date any call is made.[12] The seller must also maintain records documenting this process.[13]

5.The opening of the National Do-Not-Call Registry was announced on June 27, 2003. That same day, consumers were permitted to begin registering their telephone numbers on the Registry online or by calling a toll-free number. Within the first three days of the Registry’s operation, consumers had registered more than 10 million telephone numbers.[14] As of June 2004, one year after opening registration to the public, the National Registry contained more than 62 million telephone numbers. Today, the National Do-Not-Call Registry contains over 157 million numbers.[15]

B.Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

6.On December 4, 2007, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (DNC NPRM) that tentatively concluded that the Commission should amend its rules so that sellers and/or telemarketers would be required to honor registrations with the National Do-Not-Call Registry until the registration is cancelled by the consumer or the telephone number is removed by the database administrator because it was disconnected or reassigned.[16] The Commission noted its concern that, starting June 28, 2008, five years after the opening of the Registry, as many as 10 million registered numbers might expire and be automatically removed from the database unless consumers take steps to re-register the numbers.[17] The Commission sought comment on this tentative conclusion, as well as how to implement such a rule change and coordinate with the FTC.[18] In response to the DNC NPRM, the Commission received 41 comments and 6 reply comments.[19] The majority of commenters support the proposed rule change,[20] arguing that removing the current five-year registration period is in the public interest and will enhance consumer privacy interests.[21] In addition, although not raised in the DNC NPRM, several commenters urged the Commission to amend the company-specific do-not-call rules which require companies to honor do-not-call requests for five years.

C.The Do-Not-Call Improvement Act

7.On February 15, 2008, Congress passed into law the Do-Not-Call Improvement Act of 2007 (DNC Act).[22] The DNC Act amends the Do-Not-Call Implementation Act and prohibits the automatic removal of telephone numbers registered on the National Do-Not-Call Registry since the establishment of the Registry and those numbers registered after the date of enactment of the law.[23] Further, the DNC Act requires the FTC to periodically check telephone numbers registered on the Registry against national or other appropriate databases and to remove those telephone numbers that have been disconnected and reassigned.[24] Finally, the DNC Act requires the FTC, no later than 9 months after enactment of the law, to report to Congress on efforts taken by the FTC to improve the accuracy of the Do-Not-Call Registry.[25]

D.The Do-Not-Call Registry Fee Extension Act

8.Congress also enacted the Do-Not-Call Registry Fee Extension Act of 2007 on February 15, 2008.[26] The Fee Extension Act provides for the collection of fees by the FTC to implement and enforce the Do-Not-Call Registry.[27] The law also provides that no later than December 31, 2009, and biennially thereafter, the FTC, in consultation with this Commission, shall transmit a report to Congress that includes—1) the number of consumers who have placed their telephone numbers on the registry; 2) the number of persons paying fees for access to the registry and the amount of such fees; 3) the impact on the Do-Not-Call Registry of the five-year reregistration requirement, new telecommunications technology, and number portability and abandoned telephone numbers; and 4) the impact of the established business relationship exception on businesses and consumers.[28]

III.DISCUSSION

9.Consistent with the DNC Act, we amend our rules to require sellers and/or telemarketers to honor registrations with the National Do-Not-Call Registry until the registration is cancelled by the consumer or the telephone number is removed by the database administrator. Further, we recognize the importance of ensuring the continued accuracy of the Registry. To assist the database administrator with removing disconnected and reassigned numbers from the Registry, we encourage Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) to timely and accurately convey such information to the FTC. We intend to coordinate closely with the FTC on this issue and to consult with them on ways to further enhance the Registry’s accuracy. Finally, for the reasons discussed below, we decline to consider changes to our company-specific do-not-call rules at this time.[29]

A.Registrations

10.We agree with those commenters that argue that eliminating the need for consumers to re-register their numbers will enhance consumer privacy protections and benefit the federal government in administering the National Registry. Making registrations permanent will alleviate any burdens on consumers associated with re-registering numbers, including the time and effort necessary to register and the need to remember when to re-register.[30] As noted by the Nebraska Public Service Commission (Nebraska PSC), in addition to benefiting consumers, eliminating the automatic removal of registrations after five years will save valuable government resources that would have been necessary to re-register millions of expired numbers.[31] The FTC has committed to not drop any telephone numbers from the Registry based on the five-year registration period.[32] In addition, Congress has prohibited the removal of registered numbers, unless the consumer cancels the registration or the number has been disconnected and reassigned. Amending our rules to require sellers and/or telemarketers to continue to honor registrations for as long as they remain in the Registry, is therefore consistent with the FTC’s policy and Congress’s mandate, as well as with the record developed in this proceeding. Accordingly, we modify Section 64.1200(c)(2) of the Commission’s rules to require sellers and/or telemarketers to honor numbers registered on the Registry indefinitely or until the number is removed by the database administrator or the registration is cancelled by the consumer.

11.Furthermore, we disagree with the National Association of Realtors (NAR) that requiring sellers and/or telemarketers to honor registrations indefinitely will result in increased burdens for small businesses. As NASUCA and the Nebraska PSC note, sellers and/or telemarketers—including those that are small businesses—will be required to access the Registry and avoid calling numbers in the Registry just as they do today.[33] Small businesses can continue to access the Registry on an area-code-by-area-code basis and need only purchase those area codes in which the seller intends to telemarket.[34] In addition, the national database provides a single number feature whereby a small number of telephone numbers can be entered on a web page to determine whether any of those numbers are included on the Registry. Therefore, we do not believe the amended rules will be burdensome for sellers and/or telemarketers, including small businesses.[35]

B.Accuracy of the National Do-Not-Call Registry

12.We recognize the importance of maintaining an accurate Do-Not-Call Registry. The DNC Act provides that the FTC shall periodically check the numbers in the Registry and purge those numbers that have been disconnected and reassigned.[36] Currently, the database administrator checks all telephone numbers in the Registry once a month against national databases to remove any disconnected and reassigned numbers.[37] Several commenters that support eliminating the five-year registration period urge the Commission to take additional steps to ensure that the Registry is accurate.[38] ATA and NAA argue that numbers should be removed from the Registry when they are either disconnected or reassigned.[39] ATA believes that eliminating a number from the Registry when it is first disconnected, rather than waiting for that number to be reassigned, will enhance the Registry’s accuracy.[40]

13.We anticipate that the FTC will continue to remove any disconnected and reassigned numbers from the Registry, as required by the DNC Act. In addition, we intend to work closely with the FTC to consider options to enhance the Registry’s accuracy, including whether scrubbing the database more frequently is possible and might improve the overall accuracy of the database.[41] As suggested by some commenters, we encourage LECs to report information on disconnected and reassigned numbers to the FTC subcontractor as timely as possible so that such numbers might be purged more than once per month.[42] The NAA argues that more rapid reporting of this data by telephone companies to the FTC subcontractor will allow the FTC to improve the accuracy of the Registry.[43] We also encourage these parties to submit such proposals directly to the FTC.[44]

14.Finally, we decline to require that business and wireless numbers be removed from the Registry, as the DMA proposes.[45] As the Commission has previously stated, the National Do-Not-Call Registry applies to “residential subscribers” and does not preclude calls to businesses.[46] To the extent that some business numbers have been inadvertently registered on the national registry, calls made to such numbers will not be considered violations of our rules. In addition, the Commission has concluded that wireless subscribers are entitled to the same protections from unwanted telemarketing calls as wireline subscribers and may participate in the National Do-Not-Call Registry.[47]

C.Company-Specific Do-Not-Call Rules

15.In response to the DNC NPRM, the Commission received several comments relating to section 64.1200(d) of the Commission’s rules, which requires a company to honor a consumer’s company-specific do-not-call request for a period of five years.[48] The Commission’s company-specific do-not-call rules were not raised in the DNC NPRM and therefore are beyond the scope of the current proceeding. Should the Commission find that this issue warrants further review in the future, we will initiate a rulemaking proceeding at that time.

D.Conclusion

16.Accordingly, we amend our rules to require sellers and/or telemarketers to honor registrations on the National Do-Not-Call Registry indefinitely.[49] This action is consistent with Congress’s mandate in the DNC Act, which prohibits the removal of numbers from the Registry unless the numbers have been disconnected and reassigned or are otherwise invalid.[50] Further, we encourage LECs to timely and accurately convey information on disconnected and reassigned numbers to the FTC, and we will continue to coordinate with the FTC on additional ways to improve the Registry’s accuracy.

IV.PROCEDURAL MATTERs

A.Paperwork Reduction Act

17. This Report and Order contains modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. It will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Section 3507(d) of the PRA. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies are invited to comment on the modified information collection requirements contained in this proceeding.

18. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Review Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might “further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. In this present document, we have assessed the effect of these rule changes and find that there likely will be an increased administrative burden on businesses with fewer than 25 employees. However, the amended rules do not require the maintenance of any additional records or require entities to alter their current practices to comply with the National Do-Not-Call Registry. These measures should substantially alleviate any burdens on businesses with fewer than 25 employees.

B.Congressional Review Act

19. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A).

C.Materials in Accessible Formats

20. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Report and Order can also be downloaded in Word and Portable Document Format (PDF) at

D.Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

21.Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended,[51] the Commission’s Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis regarding the Report and Order is attached as Appendix B.

V.ORDERING CLAUSES

22.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1-4, 227 and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 74 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 227 and 303(r); and Section 64.1200 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200, this Report and Order in CG Docket No. 02-278 IS ADOPTED, and Part 64 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200, IS AMENDED as set forth in Appendix A.

23.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the rules as revised in Appendix A SHALL BE EFFECTIVE after approval by OMB. The Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date of the amended rules.

24.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission’s Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Report and Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Marlene H. Dortch

Secretary

APPENDIX A

Final Rules

Title 47, Part 64 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 64 – MISCELLANEOUS RULES RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS

1. The authority citation for Part 64 as of October 1, 2007, continues to read as follows:

47 U.S.C. 154, 254(k); secs. 403(b)(2)(B), (c), Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56. Interpret or apply 47 U.S.C. 201, 218, 222, 225, 226, 228, and 254 (k) unless otherwise noted.

* * * * *

2. Section 64.1200(c)(2) is revised to read as follows:

* * *

(c) No person or entity shall initiate any telephone solicitation, as defined in paragraph (f)(12) of this section, to:

* * *

(2) A residential telephone subscriber who has registered his or her telephone number on the national do-not-call registry of persons who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations that is maintained by the federal government. Such do-not-call registrations must be honored indefinitely, or until the registration is cancelled by the consumer or the telephone number is removed by the database administrator. Any person or entity making telephone solicitations (or on whose behalf telephone solicitations are made) will not be liable for violating this requirement if:

1

Federal Communications CommissionFCC 08-147