http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&hid=102&sid=f2c1f66c-f35a-401e-953f-5ec7f791cc1d%40sessionmgr113&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=43034087

Elementary teachers' use and perception of rewards in the classroom

Authors:

Hoffmann, Kristin F.
Huff, Jessica D.1
Patterson, Ashley S.1
Nietfeld, John L.1

Source:

Teaching & Teacher Education; Aug2009, Vol. 25 Issue 6, p843-849, 7p

Document Type:

Article

Subject Terms:

*REWARDS & punishments in education
*CLASSROOM management
*ADJUSTMENT (Psychology)
*LEARNER autonomy
*INTRINSIC motivation
*SELF-efficacy
*REWARD (Psychology)

Abstract:

In the past four decades much research has gone into the use of rewards in education yet little attention has been given to the use of rewards from the perspective of teachers. This mixed method study examined how elementary school teachers define and use rewards in their classrooms and how various motivational constructs such as goal orientation, self-efficacy, and autonomy relate to teachers' use of rewards. Results revealed that all teachers in our sample use some form of rewards in their classrooms and the majority use some form of tangible rewards. Rewards were most frequently given for behaviour management, but there was a significant relationship between the use of rewards for behaviour and those given for academic achievement. Performance goal orientations for teaching were positively related to the use of tangible rewards and a higher degree of classroom control and negatively related to teacher self-efficacy. When asked to report on the appropriateness of using rewards in the classroom only one-third of the teachers reported that they should be used conditionally. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Copyright of Teaching & Teacher Education is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Author Affiliations:

1North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

ISSN:

0742051X

DOI:

10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.004

Accession Number:

43034087

Database:

Academic Search Premier