/

MUSEUM EXHIBIT SCORING RUBRIC

/ PRESENTER: ______
PROJECT: ______
EVALUATOR: ______DATE: ______
CRITERIA
/

WEIGHT

/

UNSATISFACTORY

(Below Performance Standards) /

PROFICIENT

(Minimal Criteria) /

ADVANCED

(Demonstrates Exceptional Performance)

Structure and Organization

Presentation of Exhibit
/ 15% / ·  The country’s role in the war was not effectively illustrated by the evidence
·  Presentation was unorganized
·  Too much lag time
·  Your war “aspect” was not clearly presented / ·  The country’s role in the war was adequately illustrated by the evidence
·  Presentation was sufficiently organized
·  Very little lag time
·  Your war “aspect” was clear / ·  The country’s role in the war was clearly illustrated by the evidence
·  Presentation was well-organized
·  No lag time
·  Your war “aspect” was crystal clear
0 ------5 ------8 / 9 ------11 ------12 / 13 ------14 ------15
Vocal Expression (ind.)Rate and Volume of Speech
Pitch, Articulation and
Pronunciation / 15% / ·  Speaker was hard to hear or understand
·  Voice or tone distracted from purpose of presentation
·  Excessive use of verbal fillers
·  Speech was read / ·  Speaker was easy to hear and understand
·  Tone was generally conversational, but with purpose
·  Voice sounded natural, neither patterned nor monotone
·  Speaker pronounced words clearly, correctly and without verbal fillers / ·  Speaker was enjoyable to hear; used expression and emphasis
·  Speaker used voice to create an emotional response in audience
·  Tone was conversational, but with purpose
0 ------5 ------8 / 9 ------11 ------12 / 13 ------14 ------15
Physical Characteristics (ind.)
Eye Contact, Posture,
Gestures, Movement, Attire / 15% / ·  Little eye contact with audience
·  Poor or slouchy posture
·  Movements were stiff or unnatural
·  Attire was inappropriate for audience / ·  Strong eye contact with entire audience
·  Posture conveyed confidence
·  Gestures and movements were natural and effective
·  Attire was appropriate for audience and purpose / In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria …
·  Posture was commanding and purposeful
·  Attire was chosen to enhance presentation
0 ------5 ------8 / 9 ------11 ------12 / 13 ------14 ------15
Creativity / 20% / ·  Artifacts do not clearly define country or “aspect”
·  Table is unclear or irrelevant
·  Overall display is plain
·  There are no added features / ·  Artifacts clearly define country or “aspect”
·  Effective use of table
·  The overall display has unique features
·  There are a few added features / ·  Well-made artifacts clearly define country or aspect
·  Superior use of table
·  Very unique overall display
·  Added features make the group go above and beyond expectations
0 ------7 ------11 / 12 ------14------15 / 16 ------18 ------20
Aesthetic Quality / 15% / ·  Not Colorful
·  Sloppy
·  Unorganized overall appearance / ·  Colorful
·  Neat
·  Overall appearance is organized / ·  Flourishing Color
·  Exceedingly Neat
·  Overall appearance is excellently organized
0 ------5 ------8 / 9 ------11 ------12 / 13 ------14 ------15
Visual Features
Multimedia, Visuals, Audio / 20% / ·  Unorganized PowerPoint Photo essay
·  Inferior Propaganda Poster
·  Charts are irrelevant or unclear
·  Maps are irrelevant or poorly made
·  Individual assignments do not look authentic / ·  Organized PowerPoint Photo essay
·  Propaganda Poster well done
·  Charts are effective
·  Maps fit the display and are done well.
·  Individual assignments could pass as authentic / ·  Superior PowerPoint Photo essay
·  Excellent Propaganda Poster
·  Very Clear and Relevant Charts
·  Maps enhance the display
·  Individual assignments look authentic
0 ------7 ------11 / 12 ------14------15 / 16 ------18 ------20

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: