MATHEMATICS 20-2
INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING
High School collaborative venture with
Edmonton Christian, Institutional Services, Jasper Place, Millwoods Christian, Queen Elizabeth and Victoria Schools
Edmonton Christian: Jenn Johnson
Institutional Services: Eric Hanson
Jasper Place: Jessica Noselski
Millwoods Christian: Ken Scharf
Queen Elizabeth: David Hernandez-Rivera
Victoria: Gina MacKechnie
Facilitator: John Scammell (Consulting Services)
Editor: Jim Reed (Contracted)
2010 - 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STAGE 1 DESIRED RESULTS / PAGEBig Idea
Enduring Understandings
Essential Questions / 4
4
4
Knowledge
Skills / 5
6
STAGE 2 ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE
Transfer Task
Detective Challenge
Teacher Notes for Transfer Task
Transfer Task
Glossary and Rubric
Possible Solution / 7
8
14
16
STAGE 3 LEARNING PLANS
Lesson #1 Identifying Patterns and Writing Conjectures / 18
Lesson #2 Inductive Reasoning & Counterexamples / 25
Lesson #3 Deductive Reasoning
/ 30
Lesson #4 Proofs by Induction / 37
Lesson #5 Proofs by Deduction / 42
Mathematics 20-2
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
STAGE 1 Desired ResultsBig Idea:
In the world around us it is important to see all types of problems from different perspectives. We can use inductive and deductive reasoning to make general assumptions and to validate an argument.
Enduring Understandings:
Students will understand …
· Patterns exist in many forms and can be identified and described.
· Inductive reasoning is based on patterns and assumptions that can leave an argument open to flaws.
· Deductive reasoning attempts to show that a conclusion follows from a set of premises.
· Inductive and deductive reasoning can be applied to contextual problems.
· Number sense and logic can be used to validate/disprove arguments.
Essential Questions:
· When is it appropriate to use deductive and/or inductive reasoning?
· What are some real-life applications of deductive and inductive reasoning?
· What is the role of a counterexample?
· Is there a unique proof for each argument?
Knowledge:
EnduringUnderstanding / Specific
Outcomes / Description of
Knowledge
Students will understand…
· Inductive reasoning is based on patterns and assumptions that can leave your argument open to flaws.
· Deductive reasoning attempts to show that a conclusion follows from a set of premises.
· Inductive and deductive reasoning can be applied to contextual problems.
· Number sense and logic can be used to validate/disprove arguments. / *N1, N2 / Students will know …
· how to identify a pattern
· what deductive reasoning is
· what inductive reasoning is
· when to use inductive reasoning
· when to use deductive reasoning
· what makes a counter example valid
· if an argument is valid
· how to identify an error
· that if an error occurs, two outcomes can arise:
o the entire case is disproved
o an exception is revealed
8888
I*N = Number
Skills:
Understanding / Specific
Outcomes / Description of
Skills
Students will understand…
· Inductive reasoning is based on patterns and assumptions that can leave your argument open to flaws.
· Deductive reasoning attempts to show that a conclusion follows from a set of premises.
· Inductive and deductive reasoning can be applied to contextual problems.
· Number sense and logic can be used to validate/disprove arguments. / *N1, N2 / Students will be able to…
· use appropriate tools to demonstrate their arguments
· demonstrate their arguments
· use appropriate tools to prove/disprove an argument
· prove using algebraic methods
· recognize false conjectures
· state a conjecture by observing patterns
· use
o divisibility rules
o number properties
o algebra and number relations in order to justify an argument
*N = Number
STAGE 2 Assessment Evidence1 Desired Results Desired Results
Detective Challenge
Teacher Notes
There is one transfer task to evaluate student understanding of the concepts relating to inductive and deductive reasoning. A photocopy-ready version of the transfer task is included in this section.
Notes are included in the sample solution following the transfer task.
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 2 of 46
Detective Challenge - Student Assessment Task
Stanley Skeezeball has recently been a victim of a theft crime. He is accusing Johnny B. Good, his former business partner, of stealing company property and money from their office on the 11th floor of The Big Tall Towers Office Building.
The lead detective has obtained information. Inspect the Crime Report and use your knowledge of logic and reasoning to help the Edmonton Police Department. Answer the following questions and present your findings in the Intern Report.
o List the information given.
o Summarize how the crime was committed?
o Use inductive reasoning to prove who committed the crime
o Use inductive reasoning to prove if Johnny B. Good was involved.
o Is he guilty?
o Provide a counterexample to support your conclusions.
o Explain how your inductive reasoning may lead to a false conclusion.
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 2 of 46
Crime/Incident Report
CR
I
M
E / Type of Incident:
Break and Enter, Theft, Vandalism / Year
2010 / Day of Week
Wednesday / Time
8:30 pm
Location of Incident (or address) City
Private Office of Stan Skeezeball and Johnny B. Good Edmonton
Big Tall Towers Office Building – 11th floor
W
I
T
N
E
S
S / Witness Name:
Beefy "Bulldog" Jones (Security Guard)
Witness Statement:
The following witness statement is an account of the events according to Beefy ‘Bulldog’ Jones (Security Guard) from his kiosk in the front lobby.
· At 8:30 pm a key card was used to gain entry to the front lobby of The Big Tall Towers Office Building
· Male 1 approximately 6’3” with short brown hair entered the mail lobby. As Mr. Jones returned from a nightly walk he witnessed the male enter the stairwell on the North side of the building at 8:31 pm. He only saw the male from behind
· At 8:35 pm a different key card was used to gain entry to the front lobby of The Big Tall Towers Office Building.
· Mr. Jones witnessed a second male enter the main lobby and proceed to the elevator at 8:36 pm. Male 2 was approximately 5’10” and wore a ball cap.
· At 8:37 pm the security camera caught male 1 walking the corridors on the 11th floor.
· At 8:38 pm male 2 exited the elevator on the 10th floor (security camera).
· At 8:42 pm male 2 was seen walking down the corridor on the 11th floor (security camera).
· At 8:45 pm Mr. Jones departed the kiosk to complete a nightly walk around the perimeter of the building.
· Male 2 entered the elevator on the 10th floor at 8:52 pm.
· Male 2 entered lobby and departed from the building at 8:54 pm.
· Mr. Jones witnessed male 1 departing from the back entry of the building while on his nightly walk around the building. Male 1 departed at 8:58 pm.
Witness Name:
Mr. Sid Clean (Custodian)
Witness Statement:
Mr. Sid Clean (Custodian) provided the following witness statement.
· Mr. Clean began his shift at 6:00 pm; he was assigned to clean floors 10, 11 and 12.
· Mr. Clean witnessed a male (6’3” with short brown hair) on the 12th floor just before his break.
· Mr. Clean stated he normally takes his break at 8:45 pm. The break room is on the 11th floor.
· During his break Mr. Clean heard banging from down the hall.
· Mr. Clean received a text message from his girlfriend at 8:51 pm right before he went to the bathroom on the 10th floor.
· On his way to the bathroom Mr. Clean stopped right outside the bathroom door and saw a male with a ball cap on walking towards the elevator.
M
O
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N / Total # of witnesses at crime: 2
Place
of attack: Business Vehicle Street/Alley Lot/Park/Yard Vessels Other
Description of Surrounding area:
Residential Business Industrial/Mftg. Recreational Institutional Open Space School Marine/Water Other
Force Tool Weapon
/ Specify:
Hammer / How Used:
Broke Lock on door
Type of Structure N/A
High Rise Office Building /
Security Used
Security guard on duty. / Suspect ActionsPoint of Entry
Key card used to enter lobby of office building /P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y / Item
No. Article Name / Stolen / Miscellaneous Description / Value
Received
1 Laptop / stolen / MacBook Pro - neon pink, sticker on cover "I love Butterflies"
Includes personal information from clients and banking records and codes / $1200
2 Money / stolen / Taken from safe, $50 bills bundled in groups of 25, 2 bundles / $2500
S
U
S
P
E
C
T
S / Arrested
Y N / Suspect #1
Johnny B. Good / Sex
Male / Age
38 / DOB
February 29, 1972 / Height
5'10'' / Weight
195 lbs / Build
Average / Hair color
brown / Eye color
brown
Additional information/Further suspect description (i.e., glasses, tattoos, teeth, birthmarks, jewellery, scars, etc.
None
Suspect’s clothing
Red New York Yankees Baseball Cap, Dark Grey Jacket, Black Pants
Hair Length/Type
Short, brown hair, slightly balding / Hair Style
Crew Cut / Facial Hair
None / Complexion
Normal / General Appearance
N/A
N
A
R
R
A
T
I
V
E / Evidence:
No fingerprints found
Hammer found near office door
Officer’s statement/investigation
Upon further investigation it was discovered that the security tapes were damaged beyond repair.
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
Intern Report
List the information given:
Summarize the crime that was committed…
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
Write a proof statement about who committed the crime (male 1 or male 2?):
Statement / ReasonWrite a proof statement about who Johnny B. Good is (male 1 or male 2?):
Statement / ReasonMathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
Johnny B. Good is ______.
(guilty/not guilty)
Counterexample (How could you prove that the other person is guilty/not guilty?):
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
False Conclusion (how could your inductive reasoning be incorrect? Where are the gaps in your logic?)
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 10 of 47
Glossary
conjecture - A generalization made through inductive reasoning
deductive reasoning – A type of reasoning by which generalizations are drawn from specific patterns in observed data
inductive reasoning – A type of reasoning by which generalizations are drawn from general patterns in observed data
pattern – A repeated sequence or arrangement about which predictions can be made
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 15 of 46
Assessment
Mathematics 20-2
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Rubric
LevelCriteria / 4
Excellent / 3
Proficient / 2
Adequate / 1
Limited *
Explanations of proof / Shows thorough
understanding;
explanations are
effective and thorough. / Shows understanding;
explanations are appropriate. / Shows partial
understanding;
explanations are
often incomplete or
somewhat confusing. / Shows very limited
understanding;
explanations
are omitted or
inappropriate.
Explains Choice / Shows a solution for the problem; provides a logical and insightful explanation. / Shows a solution for the problem; provides an adequate explanation. / Shows a solution for the problem; provides explanations that are complete but vague. / Shows a solution for the problem; provides explanations that are incomplete or confusing.
Solves and explains the solution using appropriate terminology conjecture, deductive inductive reasoning). / The student(s) has/have a good understanding of terminology and are able to correctly solve and explain the solution. / For the most part student(s) has/have an understanding of terminology and can solve and explain the solution. / Student(s) has/have a partial understanding of terminology and have errors in explaining the solution. / Student(s) has/have limited understanding of terminology and cannot correctly explain or solve the question.
Communicates findings in a thoughtful and convincing manner. Student(s) show(s) clear understanding of inductive and deductive reasoning / Communicates findings in a thoughtful and convincing manner, using specific mathematical vocabulary. / Communicates findings in an interesting and coherent manner, using appropriate mathematical vocabulary. / Communicates findings in a predictable and simplistic manner using inconsistent mathematical vocabulary. / Communicates findings in a confusing and vague manner using inappropriate mathematical vocabulary.
When work is judged to be limited or insufficient, the teacher makes decisions about appropriate intervention to help the student improve.
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 15 of 46
Possible Solution to Detective Challenge
Mathematics 20-2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Page 15 of 46
STAGE 3 Learning PlansLesson 1
Identifying Patterns and Writing Conjectures
STAGE 1BIG IDEA:
In the world around us it is important to see all types of problems from different perspectives. We can use inductive and deductive reasoning to make general assumptions and to validate an argument.
ENDURING UNDERSTANDINGS:
Students will understand …
· Patterns exist in many forms and can be identified and described. / ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS:
· What are some real-life applications of deductive and inductive reasoning?
KNOWLEDGE:
Students will know …
· how to identify a pattern / SKILLS:
Students will be able to …
· state a conjecture by observing patterns
Lesson Summary
Students will be able to identify patterns pictorially and numerically and write a conjecture regarding the observed properties.
Lesson Plan
Initial Activity:
From the information provided, find the names and positions of the first eight to finish the marathon. Sean finishes the marathon in fourth place; he finishes after John, but before Sandra. Sandra finishes before Robert but after Liam. John finishes after Rick but before Alex. Anne finishes two places after Alex. Liam is sixth to finish the race.